AL | AL language code samples for developing extensions

The condition in the while loop

For me, this is a natural fit for awk:

The problem is that your document class already selects a bibliography style, which you can't change afterwards. Two workarounds:

• use the style your document class sets by removing \bibliographystyle{IEEEannot} from your code

• if you actually do need the other style, save olplainarticle.cls under a new name and change l.8 \ProvidesClass{olplainarticle}[06/12/2015, v1.0] to the new name, remove line 43/44 \RequirePackage{natbib} \bibliographystyle{apalike} from the new .cls file and then change \documentclass{olplainarticle} to the new name

It doesn't look like It can be filtered during reading. But you can do it after:

For question #1, look at the documentation for Console.WriteLine(). There are several overloads, but the one matching the way you call the function expects a string and an object. That overload knows to use the ToString() method on the passed object. You could simplify the line even further like this, which will do the same thing:

You don't need to create your dictionary from the corpus - instead, create a single dictionary entry for your locality list, and look that up to generate a count of each locality. You can then count them by compiling the dfm, and then converting the feature of that dictionary key into a logical to get the vector you want.

While DOSBox emulates a 32-bit CPU, DOS itself runs in 16-bit real mode, without tools like DOS4gw, used in some DOS Games, such as Doom.

I think the -f win32 command line option is to blame for this error.

As mentioned by @oguz_ismail in the comments, bug-bash@gnu.org is the appropriate place to report the bug.

However, a certain format for the email is required/requested, when you need to report a bug.

All bug reports should include:

• The version number of Bash.
• The hardware and operating system.
• The compiler used to compile Bash.
• A description of the bug behaviour.
• A short script or ‘recipe’ which exercises the bug and may be used to reproduce it.

You can find ALL the details at: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Reporting-Bugs.html

Finally, there is a helper script built into bash itself. Call bashbug from the command line, and it will populate most of the requirements, leaving you to fill out the description and the steps required to reproduce the bug.

addressing of variables in data section

I believe your confusion stems from this idea that your variables are in a separate 'data' section.

Many assemblers will allow you to organize the program in multiple sections like .stack, .data, and .code, and if you do that kind of programming, then the offset address of a data item would not change after inserting an extra instruction.

But your current bootsector code is much simpler. You are not using sections at all. Everything you write gets encoded right where it is.

The code that prints the address occupies 17 bytes.

In the abscense of the 'section 2 instruction', the address of the char1 variable would be 19. That's 17 plus the 2 bytes comming from the jmp $ instruction.

By inserting the 'section 2 instruction', the address of the char1 variable became 22. That's 17 plus the 3 bytes coming from mov bx, char2 plus the 2 bytes coming from the jmp $ instruction.

ps I'm assuming nothing comes before the printing code...