flask-website | Twitter Dynamic Topic Modelling | Topic Modeling library
kandi X-RAY | flask-website Summary
kandi X-RAY | flask-website Summary
Twitter Dynamic Topic Modelling
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Decorator to log the phase of each token .
- r Computes the maximum weighting of a graph .
- r Estimate least squares .
- Generate a table from a text file .
- r Construct a networkx .
- Optimizes edit paths .
- Analyze group .
- Updates an item .
- Plot a dot plot .
- Define prototype .
flask-website Key Features
flask-website Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on flask-website
QUESTION
I have a simple .gitlab-ci.yml
file which duty is to create venv
&& install requirements.txt
&& activate virtual environment in the before_script
, but this is done only if the venv
dir doesn't exists. Then in each next stage I want to re-use that cached venv
which I can do successfully but with a problem between pipelines.
So the main idea is to have a cache that is independent on each pipeline, so for example, 1st time I push to gitlab and it runs this pipeline creating and using the cache, then the second time I push to gitlab I do not want that it would use previously created cache and would start fresh (because for e.g. I have new dependencies), but at the moment in Example 1 I always get the same cache and it always uses the same venv
, which is not ideal. While in the Example 2 I have created a custom cleanup
stage where I delete the cache, which works then fine as for the next pipeline I create a new venv
dir and install all the requirements
, but I get an ugly WARNING: venv/: no matching files
which I do not want to see in results.
Custom cleanup cache warning message
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-13 at 15:11On Linux shell/docker executors use key: "$CI_PIPELINE_ID"
If you are using a requirements file with pinned versions, using $key: "$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG"
would make more sense, since your requirements will only change in the commit ref changes. This will allow MR pipelines and branch pipelines with the same commit ref to share the cache.
%VAR%
syntax is for Windows batch.
QUESTION
I want to setup a Flask webiste on digitalocean with some links that launch some games either backed by tornando/twisted or to other Flask websites. The architecture for the website can be shown in the following diagram:
Most of the tutorials I have seen Example 1, Example 2 , Example 3 and some stackoverflow answers deal with this in one fashion or another. My issues with them is:
(a) Example 1 while being ridiculously easy, is opaque. It does not help me to understand ngnix, gunicorn properly to enable me to set up my application as shown in the figure above.
(b) Example 2, is what I am trying to use but when I go to my site url, it defaults to the nginx web page. I would post the link to the full problem. The link
(c) Example 3, does not use Docker.
My questions is this:
(a) Is my proposed architecture even feasible with the combination of Docker, Flask, Nginx and uwsgi/gunicorn? Is there a better way?
(b) Should I even use Docker? I wanted to use Docker to learn how to use docker-compose and eventually Docker Swarm, but if it is too much of hassle, I am willing to drop the idea entirely.
Thanks for your responses.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-23 at 23:54nginx is your reverse proxy: it directs calls from a url to the proper server. You need nginx to be able to receive requests from multiple URL / domain names on to the same IP address: for example if site1.example.com, site2.example.com and site3.example.com all have a DNS record pointing to IP 111.222.333.444, nginx can understand that site1.example.com is your server1, site2 is server2 etc... (even if all these 'servers' are hosted on the same VM.
uwsgi/gunicorn is the server engine that Flask runs on.
Flask is the framework that helps you build the site, and runs on uwsgi/gunicorn.
Docker helps you containerize the apps (i.e. make them easy to deploy, reproducible no matter where you deploy)
So, in your case, you should use a Docker container per app, they can all run uwsgi/gunicorn on port 8000 for example, and serve your apps. With docker, on deploy, you can expose these containers with different ports (like app1->8000, app2->8001, app3->8002)
Then nginx should be exposed to the outside (i.e. port 443 for HTTPS/SSL, 80 for HTTP) and redirect requests per domain/url to the proper server port.
look for nginx multiple domains to find example config file for this purpose (like https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-nginx-server-blocks-virtual-hosts-on-ubuntu-14-04-lts)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install flask-website
pyqt4 from https://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pyproj and pip install python-qt5.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page