domain-word | Tells you which words can be | Security Testing library

by BenWiederhake Python Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | domain-word Summary

domain-word is a Python library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. domain-word has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However domain-word build file is not available and it has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

Tells you which "words" can be written as a publicly available domain

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

domain-word has a low active ecosystem.

It has 38 star(s) with 3 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

domain-word has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of domain-word is current.

Quality

domain-word has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

domain-word has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

domain-word code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

domain-word has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

domain-word releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

domain-word has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

domain-word saves you 45 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 121 lines of code, 10 functions and 1 files.

It has high code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed domain-word and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into domain-word implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Compute results
Parse a pubsub file
Find all the words in a file
Simplify a line
Return all suffixes of word
Explode the source
Add a value to the list
Compute words from a wordlist file
Print all results

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

domain-word Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for domain-word.

domain-word Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for domain-word.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Security Testing

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

QUESTION

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network