shelves | Inkscape extension that parametrically generates plans

I have some hierarchical data that I am trying to get into a more relational style table. I want to mutate a column to my dataframe that tells me the parent to each row. Here, Lights is a child to Electrical, and Wiring and Bulbs are both children to Lights, and so on. Is there a way I can say "if Level = 2, find the nearest Level 1 above it in the dataframe, and assign that as its parent?" Another example would be: if the row is a Level 3 item (Wiring), its parent would be the nearest Level 2 above it in the dataframe (Lights).

I would need the nearest Level above it since the data is stored hierarchically.

I want to make a graph for each value of a variable in my dataframe, and then pass that value through to the graph as the title. I think the best way to do this is by using the apply() family of functions, but i'm a bit of a novice and can't figure out how to do that.

For example, say I have this dataframe:

I am implementing a graph database for a large inventory management system involving many different kinds of containers and locations. When creating the initial layout, I have {items} that are "containedBy" {boxes} that are "containedBy" {shelves}. The decision I am looking into involves expected location vs actual location.

In our inventory, it is possible that items expected to be contained in a box are not present when the box is opened. This is related to upstream management by vendors. When receiving the manifest, I will be generating the vertices in the database along with their edges to represent the items being in the boxes. When the boxes are opened, I will be updating the database during the receiving process. What I want to know is this: Is it better to use an edge of "expectedContainedBy" and "containedBy" to represent possible and actual containment, or would it be better to have a single edge "containedBy" with a property of "Present: true/false".

My question here is not from a preference standpoint, but from efficiency for the purpose of retrieval and analytics. I have looked into this a bit already, but am not sure if searching for a set of edges by a property would be more efficient than searching by edge label, or if the database will grow unreasonably large by having so many edges.

Edit for clarification: Database is an Azure CosmosDB graph database using Gremlin for our query language.

I would like to implement functionality for being able to search a QPlainTextEdit for a query string, and display all matched lines in a table. Selecting a row in the table should move the cursor to the correct line in the document.

Below is a working example that finds all matches and displays them in a table. How can I get to the selected line number in the string that the plaintextedit holds? I could instead use the match.capturedEnd() and match.capturedStart() to show the matches, but line numbers are a more intuitive thing to think of, rather than the character index matches.

I'm building a React App width three bookshelves (Read, Want to Read, Reading).

I've created a component for shelves and put it on App.js. When I update a book status (changeCategory function), the book data is really updated, but the Shelf component not. :(

How can I update my component based on "books" state? (I've created a div to show all books and their status, and work's perfectly. My problem occurs only with my Shelve component).

My code:

I want to backup local, uncommitted changes to the remote repository in order to backup the changes (in case the local hard drive breaks etc.)

(In TFSC, I would have just "shelved" the changes into a shelveset (which "lives" on the TF server))

What I tried:

• I created a new branch "backup_2021-02-13" and switched to it
• I committed the changes.
• I pushed it to the remote repo.

At this point of time, my changes have been saved on the remote repository (meaning that I could recover the information in case of a broken local hard drive)

But now I have the following problem: Both in the "master" branch as well as in the "backup_2021-02-13" branch, I cannot see the previously pending changes: I can't see them on the backup branch because they have already been committed (yes, the changes are there, but already committed). I can't see them on the master branch because there, these changes do not exist at all.

But I want to continue working as if the backup process never happened (with all uncommitted changes still being uncommitted).

So, what I did was, I merged the changes from the backup branch to the master branch (no-commit, ff-only, squash). This way, I have my uncommitted changes in the master branch as uncommitted changes, as it was before any backup work.

But I doubt that this is the normal way of doing this.

So, what is the correct (and easiest) way to backup local uncommitted changes to a remote repository, but at the same time leaving the current (master) branch as it is (with all the uncommitted changes still being uncommitted)?

I have created a Powerapp which is used to audit schools and the data saves to my SQL database. I have designed a report in SSRS to display the findings of the audit. The SQL table, shown below, stores the items in each room that were audited (i.e. desks, pcs, shelves etc) plus the name of the room and whether any actions need to take place. I need my report to display one table per room with the items down the left hand side and the name of the room as a title. This should be repeated for each room. There may be a different number of rooms in each report so this will be varied. I've included a screenshot of what the table needs to look like. When I create the table, I can only get the room names down the left hand side in one table and the items across the top. Please help.

So I am making a simulation in C++ and I am using SFML for graphics. I am going to use this image here to explain what I am trying to do. So here's the issue I am facing. I spawn an object (at entry) and I want that object to move to '1'. Then I would like to move it to '4'. After that I would like to move it to the counter '1'. Now as you can see, the brown shelves labelled 1,2,3,4,5,6 are supposed to have boundaries. Same for the counter and walls as well. What I need help is in defining these boundaries OR defining movement paths so that the object moves from '1' to '4' to counter '1' without colliding with anything. I could hard-code all the paths but I am short on time and the code will get really really long. So if there is a simpler way to do this then please do tell. I appreciate all the help, thank you!

I have function that should determine the best way to fill a stack with a capacity of 200. requirements are:

• small items that still fit should be placed first
• if two items have the same size, the item with the highest price should be placed first.