sacred | Sacred is a tool to help you configure , organize , log | Machine Learning library

As I understand it you are trying to identify all possible matches for the jumbled string in your list. You could sort the letters in the jumbled word and match the resulting list against sorted lists of the words in your data file.

First of all, technically when you enter the GHC.Integer.Type module you leave the realm of Haskell and enter the realm of the current implementation that GHC uses, so this question is about GHC Haskell specifically.

All the primitive operations like (<#) are implemented as a recursive loop which you have found in the GHC.Prim module. From there the documentation tells us the next place to look is the primops.txt.pp file where it is listed under the name IntLtOp.

Then the documentation mentioned earlier says there are two groups of primops: in-line and out-of-line. In-line primops are resolved during the translation from STG to Cmm (which are two internal representations that GHC uses) and can be found in the GHC.StgToCmm.Prim module. And indeed the IntLtOp case is listed there and it is transformed in-line using mainly the mo_wordSLt function which depends on the platform.

This mo_wordSLt function is defined in the GHC.Cmm.MachOp module which contains to quote:

Machine-level primops; ones which we can reasonably delegate to the native code generators to handle.

The mo_wordSLt function produces the MO_S_Lt constructor of the MachOp data type. So we can look further into a native code generator to see how that is translated into low-level instructions. There is quite a bit of choice in platforms: SPARC, AArch64, LLVM, C, PPC, and X86 (I found all these with the search function on GitLab).

X86 is the most popular platform, so I will continue there. The implementation uses a condIntReg helper function, which is defined as follows:

dic is returning a dict object, not a list - so you can't use indexes to get the first item.

You can do this instead

In HTML file add this div with class as parent element of tables

It's because the status line passed to header() is prioritized over http_response_code() in some (all?) PHP SAPI implementations.

PHP tracks the status line and HTTP response code in two separate variables: SG(sapi_headers).http_status_line and SG(sapi_headers).http_response_code.

header('HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found') sets http_status_line to "HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found" here and updates SG(sapi_headers).http_response_code a few lines earlier, while http_response_code(503) only sets SG(sapi_headers).http_response_code to 503 here.

The code that PHP's builtin server uses for sending the headers can be found in the sapi_cli_server_send_headers function (php_cli_server.c). In that function, we see that SG(sapi_headers).http_response_code is ignored when SG(sapi_headers).http_status_line is set. The sapi_cgi_send_headers function used by PHP-FPM shows a similar story. The apache2handler SAPI uses both http_status_line and http_response_code. Theoretically, they could point to different statuses!

Maybe. But changing/fixing this behaviour after who knows how many years breaks backwards compatibility, so it should probably be left alone. It's probably best to avoid this situation altogether by sticking to either header() or http_response_code().

So the reason for the error message is that instance is a local variable in your instantiate function. Because you aren't moving its ownership to the return value, it will be dropped at the end of the function.

But then if it gets dropped, any reference to it would be invalid. That's why Rust doesn't let you return something holding a reference to the local variable.

First, your struct is redundant, because PhysicalDevice already holds a reference for the instance. Even without the local variable problem, I think you'd run into an ownership problem.

Second, let's say you rewrite and get rid of your InstanceInfo struct and instead you want to just return a PhysicalDevice<'static>. Well if that's what you promise to the compiler, then you have to make sure that the instance you create will live for as long as the program lives.

You can do that either by having instance be a static variable of your module, or by creating it at the very beginning of the program and then simply pass a reference ot it around.

For example

You didn't show how you try to get random elements so you could do something what changes order back to original.

You can use random.shuffle(list) to set random order on the list.
And then you can use for item on list: ... to get items without repetition.

The following should work. The test will fail in Python 2 if you remove the class definition.

code.py:

use the code, and make changes if there is any conflict with existing CSS.