JuliaDoc | Python package providing Sphinx extensions and a theme | Generator Utils library
kandi X-RAY | JuliaDoc Summary
kandi X-RAY | JuliaDoc Summary
JuliaDoc is now deprecated. Please use [Documenter.jl] instead.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Restart desc signature
- Escape special characters
- Restart desc section content
- Add text
JuliaDoc Key Features
JuliaDoc Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on JuliaDoc
QUESTION
I'm migrating from python/numpy to julia. I'm really confused by Julia's multidimensional arrays and it feels like there is some additional level of complexity / hassle (in comparison to numpy).
There is distinction between 1)row-vectros 2)column-vectors, 3)multidimensional arrays and 4)nested arrays (=Arrays of arrays). That would be all fine (perhaps useful for performance optimization), assuming there is simple way how to convert between them. But I cannot figure out how to do it.
Simple example: I just try to generate 2D rectangular grid of points and plot them
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-16 at 14:47There's quite a lot in the code above, but just focusing on your point of departure and the intended outcome:
Why nested array?
Your comprehension creates the array [ix*0.1 iy*0.1] for every combination of
ix and iy, so I would argue you explicitly asked for it.
There are probably some whizzy ways to either do this with a fancy comprehension or somehow flatten the nested array, but in cases like this one I like to be explicit about what I'm trying to achieve:
QUESTION
Given a module hierarchy like
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-03 at 09:29First, both B.foo and C.bar needs to (i) have docstrings and (ii) be in the markdown file, e.g. in a Documenter @docs block.
QUESTION
I am starting a Julia module and prefer to use only doctests and to skip documentation at this stage. The Julia doctest documentation says that makedocs can run doctests:
Doctesting can be disabled by setting the makedocs keyword
doctest = false.
It mentions no other method of running doctests. Does Julia offer any other way to run doctests similar to Python's import doctest and doctest.testmod()?
Note: Here is an example function:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-06 at 21:16Posting my comment as an answer:
No, that is not possible at the moment, but we have something like that in mind for future versions of Documenter.jl. I would like to point out though, that it is very easy to setup a simple document environment and just run the doctests with makedocs even if you are not planning to deploy the generated documentation. For a simple setup see e.g. this comment: Julia Documenter: missing docstring
QUESTION
From Documenter.jl's documentation of @autodocs:
[...], a Pages vector may be included in @autodocs to filter docstrings based on the source file in which they are defined:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-05 at 13:21Turns out that this is a Windows issue due to absence of normalization of path separators (see linked github issue).
On Linux Pages = ["foo/a.jl", "foo/b.jl"] should work.
On Windows Pages = ["foo\\a.jl", "foo\\b.jl"] should work.
EDIT: joinpath.("foo", ["a.jl", "b.jl"]) should work on any OS.
QUESTION
Let's say I have two methods
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-03 at 22:47As pointed out by @mortenpi on Discourse and github:
You would normally refer to a function with
[`f`](@ref), with the name of the function being referred to between backticks in text part of the link. You can then also refer to specific signatures, e.g. with[`f(::Integer)`](@ref).The @ref section in the docs should be updated to mention this possibility.
QUESTION
Julia has docstrings capabilities, which are documented here https://docs.julialang.org/en/stable/manual/documentation/. I'm under the impression that it has support for LaTeX code, but I'm not sure if the intention is that the LaTeX code should look like code or like an interpretation. In the following, the LaTeX code is garbled somewhat (see rho, for instance) and not interpreted (rho does not look like ρ). Am I doing something wrong?
Is there a way to get LaTeX code look interpreted?
What I mean by interpreted is something like what they do at https://math.stackexchange.com/.
The documentation says that LaTeX code should be wrapped around double back-quotes and that Greek letters should be typed as ρ rather than \rho. But that rather defeats the point of being able to include LaTeX code, doesn't it?
Note: Version 0.5.2 run in Juno/Atom console.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-22 at 22:06You can use
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install JuliaDoc
You can use JuliaDoc like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
