Stargazer | Github Readme crawler
kandi X-RAY | Stargazer Summary
kandi X-RAY | Stargazer Summary
Github Readme crawler
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Stargazer
Stargazer Key Features
Stargazer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Stargazer
QUESTION
My code should be a pretty easy knit to a pdf, but it will not compile and I'm getting this message in R Markdown:
! LaTeX Error: Unicode character ₁ (U+2081) not set up for use with LaTeX.
Error: LaTeX failed to compile L-work-5.tex. See https://yihui.org/tinytex/r/#debugging for debugging tips. See L- work-5.log for more info. Execution halted
here is the code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 00:22For a start, try deleting the special characters ₁
and ₂
in the line
two independent variables, X~₁i~ and X~₂i~
This will let you compile.
You might be able to get this to work by including something like
QUESTION
betareg
default residuals are heavy, which may cause an error to allocate vector due to its high size. This can be solved by changing the type
of residuals in the summary
call as explained here.
However, when presenting regression tables with stargazer
, the type of residuals can't be explicitly set.
Is there any way to make (large) betareg
objects work in stargazer
?
The potential solutions that I can think of, but don't know how to implement, are:
- Indicating the residual
type
in the originalbetareg
call (type = "pearson"
(or any other type) doesn't work). - Explicitly indicating the argument that
stargazer
should include when callingsummary
on thebetareg
object. - Any other?
Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 10:03You could take stargazer::.stargazer.wrap
to task and change how the model summary is calculated, but it's about 8k lines long.
As a workaround, it's probably much easier to first compute a smaller regression that can be digested by the table-generating function, then replace the coefficients and statistics before compiling.
I show you the method using the texreg
package, it may also be possible with stargazer
.
QUESTION
I have used the solution presented by @StupidWold here to develop a glm
and the results are stored in models
. The outputs seem to be correct. However I am wondering how to present all of the outputs at once instead of calling each one separately. I tried using the stargazer
package but the result is not as neat as I want it to be, mainly the orientation of the html is horizontal rather than vertical (have to scroll to the right).
Here is the code I used for stargazer
asking for an html file output:
stargazer(models, type="html", out = "table1.html", flip = T)
Any suggestions? Thank you.
Maybe my steps will help clarify things, here is the structure of data
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 01:17I think you could make it work like this.
QUESTION
I have this table when I run this code in R. However the numbers are so close to each other, I was wondering if there is any way I could make the space gap bigger between them?
Code: Data %>% stargazer (type="html",title = " Summary statistics of the samples", align = TRUE, out="Variables Descriptive.html")
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 13:44I couldn't find a way through the stargazer
function, but I found a workaround. I've included two ways to do this because I don't know if you're using this in RMD or using the file "Variables Descriptive.html". If you're using the HTML file in RMD (outside of R code), follow the instructions for modifying the HTML file.
Add the following before you get to the chunk that executes this table—not in a code chunk.
QUESTION
Is it possible to color the font of negative model estimates red in a stargazer
table in R
?
The idea is to more easily highlight negative and positive estimates when showcasing a regression model in a table.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-26 at 23:34I don't think it's possible with stargazer
out of the box, but you could write your own functions to accomplish this.
For example, using the LaTeX package xcolor
, we can create red text with the command \textcolor{red}{text}
. Since stargazer
prints negative numbers as $-$
, we can use the regex \\$-\\$[0-9]
to find all negative numbers (+ some logic for commas etc.), and wrap them in \textcolor{red}{text}
.
Here is a working example:
QUESTION
I am estimating a regression model with some factor/categorial variables and some numerical ones. Is it possible to display the reference category for each factor/categorial variable in the summary of the regression model?
Ideally this would translate also to texreg or stargazer to have latex output, but having them in the summary of the regression would already be a good start.
Does anybody have an Idea, what am I missing?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-23 at 09:20The reference level is the one that is missing in the summary, because the coefficients of the other levels are the contrasts to the reference level, i.e. the intercept actually represents the mean in the reference category.
QUESTION
I would like to create a reflect.Value
that represents a multiple-level nested pointer to a final value. The nesting level is not known at compile time. How can I create pointers to pointers using reflect
?
I already stumble at the "unaddressable value" hurdle when trying to create a pointer to a pointer.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-03 at 20:27Use the following code to create a pointer to the value in stargazer
.
QUESTION
I had a private repo for 6 months that I worked on. Today I finally made it public after submitting a paper. Is it possible to make the activity (those green square) visible? I tried clicking on contribution setting
and got the message Visitors will now see your public and anonymized private contributions
, but the activity still doesn't show.
Update 1:
I noticed that only changes I did on GitHub (the website rather than pushing code from my machine) were recorded. That is, only the readme
file shows as I often updated it on the website.
Update 2:
I ran git --no-pager log -s --format="%ae"
to see which emails were used for the commits and got the following:
Some emails are the primary
email under GitHub, some are of the form 43555163+Penguin@users.noreply.github.com
, some are Penguin@Penguin-MacBook-Pro.local
, some are Penguin@econ2-204-32-dhcp.int.university_name.edu
.
Also, as I mentioned in one of the comments below, if I go to my repo and specifically look at commits I can see something like: Penguin authored and Penguin committed on May 27 1 parent 1d71ac3 commit cb95c2870de67383ee653849b4c7b40a062f5fd3
. But this does not show on my activity.
Lastly, some comments mentioned creating a new repo on GitHub and pushing my previous commits (after filtering the emails somehow which I didn't quite understand). However, I already have several Stargazers
on this repo and would like to keep them. By making a new repo I believe these will disappear.
Update 3:
I used git filter-repo
to change all the emails to my primary email and now all my previous commits emails appear to be my primary email when I call git --no-pager log -s --format="%ae"
. However, I still don't see the activity showing. For example, if I go to my repo I can see that one of the commits says Penguin authored and Penguin committed on Apr 8
, but this doesn't show in the activity.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-11 at 22:43Contributions should still be shown in that case. Here are some of the reasons your contributions might not be being shown:
GitHub isn't aware of the email address you used in your commit messages
The commit wasn't made in the default or gh-pages branch
The repo is a forked repo, not a standalone repo
GitHub also mentions that it will not show commits that were made less than 24 hours ago, so it seems like they have some sort of caching mechanism going on with their contribution graph. It may help to wait 24 hours since you made the repo public, to ensure that cache has a chance to roll over.
QUESTION
Example data:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-07 at 10:55One can set model.names
to FALSE
.
QUESTION
I have a data set containing information on Crypto, S&P500 ETF, CRIX, FED Reserves, Commodities, etc. I am trying to create a Summary Statistics Table and found that the package "stargazer" is the best research publications. I don't want all of the variables from the dataset to be in the table so I tried the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-29 at 02:54You have a tibble and stargazer
doesn't support it. If you change it to dataframe it works.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Stargazer
You can use Stargazer like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page