BruteSploit | automated Generate , Bruteforce and Manipulation wordlist | Security Testing library

by Screetsec Python Version: Current License: GPL-3.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | BruteSploit Summary

BruteSploit is a Python library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. BruteSploit has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. However BruteSploit has 7 bugs, it has 9 vulnerabilities and it build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

BruteSploit is a collection of method for automated Generate, Bruteforce and Manipulation wordlist with interactive shell. That can be used during a penetration test to enumerate and can be used in CTF for manipulation,combine,transform and permutation some words or file text :p i wrote this just for fun and learn how create interactive shell is work.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

BruteSploit has a low active ecosystem.

It has 447 star(s) with 219 fork(s). There are 42 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 36 open issues and 0 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 381 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of BruteSploit is current.

Quality

BruteSploit has 7 bugs (5 blocker, 1 critical, 1 major, 0 minor) and 767 code smells.

Security

BruteSploit has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

BruteSploit code analysis shows 9 unresolved vulnerabilities (0 blocker, 0 critical, 9 major, 0 minor).

There are 55 security hotspots that need review.

License

BruteSploit is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

BruteSploit releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

BruteSploit has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

Installation instructions are available. Examples and code snippets are not available.

BruteSploit saves you 7505 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 15493 lines of code, 834 functions and 119 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed BruteSploit and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into BruteSploit implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Send a request
Build a response object
Extract cookies to a jar
Add headers to the request
Refresh the user
Erases a new line
Erases the screen
Print an error message
Create an NTLM connection
Make headers dict
Feed a buffer
Establish a connection
Setup reports
Create a connection to an address
Wrap a socket
Process the input buffer
Check the existence of a proxy
Start the worker
Handle a 401 request
Get CSRF Token
Return a unicode string from a response
Process a single path
Check if proxies are online
Yield lines from the file
Return the number of read timeout in seconds
Parse the config file

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

BruteSploit Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for BruteSploit.

BruteSploit Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for BruteSploit.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Security Testing

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

QUESTION

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install BruteSploit

git clone https://github.com/Screetsec/Brutesploit.git
cd Brutesploit
chmod +x Brutesploit
sudo ./Brutesploit or sudo su ./Brutesploit

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: