loglikelihood | A library for python to implement the 'Log Likelihood

 by   Tom-Davidson Python Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | loglikelihood Summary

kandi X-RAY | loglikelihood Summary

loglikelihood is a Python library typically used in Logging applications. loglikelihood has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A library for python to implement the 'Log Likelihood' and 'Root Log Likelihood' algorithms. Inspired by the java implementation for Mahout: This library is available from pypi: To install use pip install loglikelihood.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              loglikelihood has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 1 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              loglikelihood has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of loglikelihood is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              loglikelihood has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              loglikelihood has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              loglikelihood code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              loglikelihood is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              loglikelihood releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              It has 100 lines of code, 12 functions and 3 files.
              It has high code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed loglikelihood and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into loglikelihood implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Compute the log likelihood ratio .
            • Compute the entropic matrix .
            • Root log likelihood ratio .
            • Log of x .
            • Calculate the root log - likelihood ratio .
            • Compute the entropy of a and b .
            • Calculate the entropy of a b .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            loglikelihood Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for loglikelihood.

            loglikelihood Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for loglikelihood.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Faster way to slice a matrix in Julia
            Asked 2022-Feb-02 at 19:08

            I want to iterate over different matrix blocks based on an index variable. You can think of it as how you would compute the individual contributions to the loglikelihood of the different individuals on a model that uses panel data. That being said, I want it to be as fast as it can be.

            I've already read some questions related to it. But none of them answer my question directly. For example, What is the recommended way to iterate a matrix over rows? shows ways to run over the WHOLE bunch of rows not iterating over blocks of rows. Additionally, Julia: loop over rows of matrix (or not) is also about how to iterate over every row again and not over blocks of them.

            So here is my question. Say you have X, which is a 2x9 matrix and an id variable that indexes the individuals in the sample. I want to iterate over them to construct my loglikelihood contributions as fast as possible. I did it here just by slicing the matrix using booleans, but this seems relatively inefficient given I am for each individual checking the entire vector to see if they match or not.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-02 at 15:26

            First, I would recommend you to use vectors instead of matrices:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70955772

            QUESTION

            MCMC for estimating negative binomial distribution
            Asked 2022-Jan-19 at 21:25

            I want to estimate parameters of negative binomial distribution using MCMC Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. In other words, I have sample:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-19 at 21:25

            Change dnorm in loglikelihood to dnbinom and fix the proposal for prob so it doesn't go outside (0,1):

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70777597

            QUESTION

            CFA with lavaan in R : Can I trust my cfa results if the variance-covariance matrix does not appear to be positive definite?
            Asked 2021-Dec-02 at 11:05

            I am trying to create a structural equation model that tests the structure of latent variables underlying a big 5 dataset found on kaggle. More specifically, I would like to replicate a finding which suggests that common method variance (e.g., response biases) inflate the often observed high intercorrelations between the manifest variables/items of the big 5 (Chang, Connelly & Geeza (2012).

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-02 at 11:05

            First, let me clear up your misinterpretation of the warning message. It refers to the covariance matrix of estimated parameters (i.e., vcov(big5_CFA_cmv), from which SEs are calculated as the square-roots of the variances on the diagonal), not to the estimates themselves. Redundancy among estimates can possibly indicate a lack of identification, which you empirically check by saving the model-implied covariance matrix and fitting the same model to it.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70183347

            QUESTION

            How to count the occurrences of "c(\" in a string in a data frame in R?
            Asked 2021-Nov-19 at 15:42

            I have a data frame where certain columns contain the error and warning messages from Mplus. The text is saved in a weird format, so rather than trying to process each message, I was hoping to simply count the number of messages by counting the occurrences of c(\ in the cell as it is the unique character combination that appears before each warning or error.

            For example, one cell contains the messages:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-19 at 07:32

            You can try either reducing the part to be counted like in my comment

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70030679

            QUESTION

            Using black box likelihood in pymc3
            Asked 2021-Nov-05 at 09:42

            I'm trying to include a black box likelihood function in a pymc3 model. This likelihood function just takes a vector of parameter values and returns the likelihood (all data is already included in the function).

            So far I've been following this guide and have modified the code as follows to accommodate the fact my model only has one parameter k.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-05 at 09:42

            As per the comments I checked out this thread and discovered that pm.potential really was the cleanest way to achieve black-box likelihood. Modifying the code above as follows did the trick:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69841994

            QUESTION

            R optimise log-likelihood
            Asked 2021-Oct-15 at 05:42

            I have a function that takes in lambda and a data sample, and finds the corresponding log-likelihood value for each data point:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-15 at 05:42

            If you only want to check which of the provided lambda's returns the best fit you can do

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69568386

            QUESTION

            Pythonic way to calculate cumulative sum with complex math over numpy array
            Asked 2021-Oct-03 at 07:31

            I'm performing Data Science and am calculating the Log Likelihood of a Poisson Distribution of arrival times.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-03 at 03:02

            Seems perfectly Pythonic to me; but since numpy is already here, why not to vectorize the whole thing?

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69421705

            QUESTION

            Terminal process terminated with exit code 3221226356 (Julia and VS Code)
            Asked 2021-Sep-12 at 03:30

            I am trying to run the code below in VS Code for Julia (or directly on Julia). It is a simple example that computes the Maximum Likelihood estimator of the mean and the variance of a normal distribution (source):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-12 at 03:30

            This has been cross-posted on the Julia discourse, we'll continue to debug it there: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/cant-run-simple-jump-example/67938

            It's either:

            • An issue in VS-Code (although "when I run it directly in Julia" may rule this out)
            • An issue with Ipopt, which is either due to it installing an old version, or a weird incompatibility with this user's system

            Either way, this is likely hard to debug.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69134863

            QUESTION

            Scipy "masked arrays are not supported" error
            Asked 2021-May-25 at 07:20

            I am trying to calibrate a model using pykalman and the scipy optimiser. For some reasons scipy seem to think that my input is a masked array, but it is not. I have added the code below:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-25 at 07:20

            I found the solution, which involves a small change in the utils.py file in the pykalman library (line 73):

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67601997

            QUESTION

            Fast way to calculate customized function on a multi-dimensional array?
            Asked 2021-Apr-28 at 14:53

            I was trying to evaluate a customized function over every point on an n-dimensional grid, after which I can marginalize and do corner plots.

            This is conceptually simple but I'm struggling to find a way to do it efficiently. I tried a loop regardless, and it is indeed too slow, especially considering that I will be needing this for more parameters (a1, a2, a3...) as well. I was wondering if there is a faster way or any reliable package that could help?

            EDITS: Sorry that my description of myfunction hasn't been very clear, since the function takes some specific external data. Nevertheless here's a sample function that demonstrates it:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-28 at 14:53

            Vectorising that loop won't save you any time and in fact may make things worse.

            Instead of looping through a1_array and a2_array to create pairs, you can generate all pairs from the get go by putting them in a 100x100x2 array. This operation takes an insignificant amount of time compared to python loops. But when you're actually in the function and you're broadcasting your arrays so that you can do your calculations on data, you're now suddenly dealing with 100x100x2x500x500 arrays. You won't have memory for this and if you rely on file swapping it makes the operations exponentially slower.

            Not only are you not saving any time (well, you do for very small arrays but it's the difference between 0.03 s vs 0.005 s), but with python loops you're only using a few 10s of MB of RAM, while with the vectorised approach it skyrockets into the GB.

            But out of curiosity, this is how it could be vectorised.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67257975

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install loglikelihood

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use loglikelihood like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/Tom-Davidson/loglikelihood.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone Tom-Davidson/loglikelihood

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:Tom-Davidson/loglikelihood.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link