bi | Business intelligence for software development | Business library

It's because you are manipulating global .steplist instead of only the new elements. Also, your approach will produce a non-valid HTML, because id should be unique for each element, this approach will make all elements with the same id.

So I'd suggest add id only to the root element of new added content like so:

No sequential-across-lanes pack until AVX-512, unfortunately. (And even then only for 1 register, or not with saturation.)

The in-lane behaviour of shuffles like vpacksswd and vpalignr is one of the major warts of AVX2 that make the 256-bit versions of those shuffles less useful than their __m128i versions. But on Intel, and Zen2 CPUs, it is often still best to use __m256i vectors with a vpermq at the end, if you need the elements in a specific order. (Or vpermd with a vector constant after 2 levels of packing: How do I efficiently reorder bytes of a __m256i vector (convert int32_t to uint8_t)?)

If your 32-bit elements came from unpacking narrower elements, and you don't care about order of the wider elements, you can widen with in-lane unpacks, which sets you up to pack back into the original order.

This is cheap for zero-extending unpacks: _mm256_unpacklo/hi_epi16 (with _mm256_setzero_si256()). That's as cheap as vpmovzxwd (_mm256_cvtepu16_epi32), and is actually better because you can do 256-bit loads of your source data and unpack two ways, instead of narrow loads to feed vpmovzx... which only works on data at the bottom of an input register. (And memory-source vpmovzx... ymm, [mem] can't micro-fuse the load with a YMM destination, only for the 128-bit XMM version, on Intel CPUs, so the front-end cost is the same as separate load and shuffle instructions.)

But that trick doesn't work work quite as nicely for data you need to sign-extend. vpcmpgtw to get high halves for vpunpckl/hwd does work, but vpermq when re-packing is about as good, just different execution-port pressure. So vpmovsxwd is simpler there.

Slicing up your data into odd/even instead of low/high can also work, e.g. to get 16 bit elements zero-extended into 32-bit elements:

In your template you're calling your method editData(item) and you're passing variable item as your parameter. But in your template there is no such thing defined - I assume (without looking at the rest of your code) that you wanted to write editData(forecast) instead. This will pass the forecast variable defined in your *ngFor directive.

You can just compare the x,y,z parameters and output a list of the box numbers that pass the test.

eg: (as a function)

Bike bi = b.CalculateFinalCost(b); should just be Bike bi = CalculateFinalCost(b); No b. before the method name. The error is what it says: the Bike type doesn't contain a CalculateFinalCost method. That method is defined in your Program class.

If I understand correctly, it is the total row that you really care about. You can calculate the first two columns by unnesting both tags and payments in parallel.

Then for the total, unnest the payments without the tags:

Is this an AccessibilityService?

The reason you are getting that text is that your AccessibilityFocus is on that element. If you enable accessibility and swipe from left to right the focus will change to the "next" element - keep doing that until you focus on the correct element.

If you want to SET the accessibility focus on that element you can call:

/deleteDatail?dname={{item[0]}} implies a GET call to your flask route. The error Method not allowed means your route does not support a GET. You have to do something like

Look at this measure: