ADDA | tensorflow implement of Adversarial Discriminative Domain | Machine Learning library

The Object[] in the result CSV means that there are multiple values found per DisplayName (i.e.: iPad-PER-Students-ML03 has multiple appearances in the big CSV) hence why there are multiple serials and multiple objectIDs. This would require 2 nested loops to unroll all the data:

1. An outer loop to enumerate all rows of the Azure Groups CSV.
2. And, an inner loop to enumerate all rows of the Big CSV per appearance of DisplayName / NewGroup.

There are a few things that look odd.

I don't think you want to use bind in sc_main to make the connection to sum_regout.

I think it would be better to make the connections in sc_main before calling sc_start.

I don't think you want to make connections to alu inside the myblock function.

I don't know the exact reason for the E109 error, but the error goes away with the following code:

"still reachable" does not strictly mean it is memory leak. I belive it is because you called exit(0) instead of just returning 0. The stack didn't get cleaned up because the program got terminated with signal.

I think this type needs a generic (to capture the properties that will be added), as well as the function (to capture the object being extended).

For example:

The granularity of a fact table is the minimum set of attributes that will uniquely identify a measure.

For example (and I'm not saying this is a real world example), if you had a sales fact table and there could only be one sale per customer per day then "per customer per day" would be the granularity of that fact table. You might have other dimensions such as the store that the sale occurred in or the country where the transaction took place - but these would not affect the granularity if you could still only have one sale per customer per day, regardless of which store or country that transaction took place in

If lst is your list from the question:

When after a page load I click on AddB button and then click on AddA button, value displayed in console is 1. According to the docs, I should get a stale value (0). Why is this not the case?

The reason why you don't see stale value in that case is that when you click AddA a re-render happens. Inside that new render since value of a is different from previous render, the useEffect will be scheduled to run after react updates the UI (however the values it will reference will be from current render - because the function passed to useEffect is re-created each time one of its dependencies change, hence it captures values from that render).

Due to above reasons, that is why you see fresh value of b.

But if you had such code

It doesn't matter the order of the fields in your "StudentModel" class, because when you are adding a new instance of the class to the Firebase Realtime Database, all the fields are automatically ordered alphabetically. Besides that, the order of calling the setters on your "studentModel" object, doesn't matter too. The Firebase Console, always orders the fields alphabetically. See, the field starts with the letter "c", the second one with "d", and so on till the end, where the last field starts with "s". Unfortunately, this order cannot be changed in the Firebase Console. If you want, you can change the order in your class to be alphabetical and match the order in the database, that's fine, but it doesn't make any sense in my opinion.

The easiest way would likely be to first count all elements in common, which can be done with a collections.Counter (https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.Counter). If you then subtract the elements that are in the right place, you'll get the elements that are common but in the wrong place.