CloudFlair | 🔎 Find origin servers of websites behind CloudFlare | Security Testing library
kandi X-RAY | CloudFlair Summary
kandi X-RAY | CloudFlair Summary
CloudFlair is a tool to find origin servers of websites protected by CloudFlare who are publicly exposed and don't restrict network access to the CloudFlare IP ranges as they should. The tool uses Internet-wide scan data from Censys to find exposed IPv4 hosts presenting an SSL certificate associated with the target's domain name. For more detail about this common misconfiguration and how CloudFlair works, refer to the companion blog post at Here's what CloudFlair looks like in action. (The IP addresses in this example have been obfuscated and replaced by randomly generated IPs).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Finds and returns a list of hosts
- Get trusted certificates
- Given a list of certificates return a list of hosts
- Checks if the given domain is a CloudFlare IP
- Check if a domain is a valid DNS domain
- Check if given ip is a cloudflare IP
- Filter out cloudflare IPs
- Find candidate origin servers
- Retrieve the original homepage
- Get a random user agent
- Gets CloudFlare IP ranges
- Save a list of origins to a file
- Print origins
- Prints a list of hosts
CloudFlair Key Features
CloudFlair Examples and Code Snippets
require 'cloudflair'
# GET https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/railguns
Cloudflair.railguns
# => [...]
# GET https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones
Cloudflair.zones
# => [...]
# GET https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/cd7d068de30
require 'cloudflair'
Cloudflair.configure do |config|
config.cloudflare.auth.key = 'YOUR_API_KEY'
config.cloudflare.auth.email = 'YOUR_ACCOUNT_EMAIL'
# if you have a user_service_key, you don't need auth.key and auth.email
config.cloudflare.a
acme.com - 200
acme.com/backlog/ - 404
acme.com/controlpanel/ - 401 <-- dig deeper
acme.com/controlpanel/[bruteforce here now]
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Security Testing
QUESTION
I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)
Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)
I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?
The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?
Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?
I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.
- I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.
So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.
Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.
If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).
Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.
You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install CloudFlair
Browse to https://censys.io/account/api, and set two environment variables with your API ID and API secret
Clone the repository
Install the dependencies
Run CloudFlair (see Usage below for more detail)
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page