partially | Provably Secure Partially Blind Signatures '' by Masayuki ABE | Cryptography library

C++20 recognizes that there can be different spellings of the same effective requirements. So the standard defines two concepts: "equivalent" and "functionally equivalent".

True "equivalence" is based on satisfying the ODR (one-definition rule):

Two expressions involving template parameters are considered equivalent if two function definitions containing the expressions would satisfy the one-definition rule, except that the tokens used to name the template parameters may differ as long as a token used to name a template parameter in one expression is replaced by another token that names the same template parameter in the other expression.

There's more to it, but that's not an issue here.

Equivalence for template heads includes that all constraint expressions are equivalent (template headers include constraints).

Functional equivalence is (usually) about the results of expressions being equal. For template heads, two template heads that are not ODR equivalent can be functionally equivalent:

Two template-heads are functionally equivalent if they accept and are satisfied by ([temp.constr.constr]) the same set of template argument lists.

That's based in part on the validity of the constraint expressions.

Your two template heads in versions 1 and 3 are not ODR equivalent, but they are functionally equivalent, as they both accept the same template parameters. And the behavior of that code will be different from its behavior if they were ODR equivalent. Therefore, this passage kicks in:

If the validity or meaning of the program depends on whether two constructs are equivalent, and they are functionally equivalent but not equivalent, the program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required.

As such, all of the compilers are equally right because your code is wrong. Obviously a compiler shouldn't straight-up crash (and that should be submitted as a bug), but "ill-formed, no diagnostic required" often carries with it unforeseen consequences.

Every red and blue cells have a minimal width (with flex-basis and flex-shrink: 0) but not the yellow.

The yellow are using the largest width possible for them, but the others are going out their container.

In this situation, the simplest way to "fix" it is to set a minimal width to the yellow bars too.

A small example (with variables to simplify maintainability)

Diff:

not sure why it is not possible nor what you're trying to accomplish specifically. But this is an idea:

1. Get the Edges

2. Dilate to close the lines

3. Hough line to detect the lines

4. Filter out the non horizontal lines

5. Inpaint the mask

6. Getting the Edges

There’s not really a nice way to achieve this currently and it’s maybe not advised. This is primarily because the list of properties that will be copied from an object are fixed at publish-/compile-time in any (nice) method I can see.

I've included the most generic version of this function I can construct below, but it has some limitations. More concretely, the copy function

1. does not copy links that aren't represented by FK properties (i.e. it only copies properties);
2. does not adapt and might break when there are new or removed properties; and
3. is not easily maintained as functionality can change depending on when it is compiled.

No, because volatile being used establishes a happens-before relationship. Without it various reorderings and other things are allowed, which make the inconsistent state possible, but with it the JVM must give you the expected outcome.

In this case volatile is not used for the visibility effects (threads seeing up to date values), but the safe publishing provided by the happpens-before. This feature of volatile is often left out when its use is explained.

On github there were a lot of issues related with SVG not downloading properly with html2canvas. I suspect these to be the issues. Solutions / workaround provided by users includes code modifications to the internal code. This is again hard to maintain further along. Also Firefox showed blank image when downloaded.

My best solution would be to use an alternative library like html-to-image. Within a few minutes everything seems to be working with this. (Even Firefox)

The GraphicsContext begins with the default BlendMode, and all forms of drawImage() use the current mode. In contrast, PixelWriter methods replace values, ignoring the BlendMode.

The example below lets you experiment with the supported BlendMode values to see the effect. Related examples are shown here and here.

using $reduce

if i'm not mistaken for task2 just change 1 in $cond, $ne to any sequence step you want

playground