relationships | redis backed user relationships on its simplest form

When you delete a record from a database, an object still persists in memory. That's why expect(person).to be_empty() fails.

RSpec has the change matcher. ActiveRecord has the persisted? method. It returns false if a record is not persisted in a database.

Use inheritance very carefully. Prefer association over inheritance whenever your inheritance is not a permanent truth from the birth to the death of an object. ANd keep in mind that dependencies between classes do not make any promises about objects of those classes.

Some clarifications on the UML syntax:

• I understand that your plain thick lines ended with a small hollow triangle represent a specialization/generalization relationship (aka inheritance). If this is correct, the triangle should be larger to avoid visual confusion. Moreover multiplicity makes no sense with inheritance and should be removed.
• I understand that with the dotted line you intend to represent an association with multiplicity. If this is correct:
  • the association should be plain lines, because dotted lines are for dependencies, and multiplicity would make no sense.
  • the meaning you give to the arrow head would be unclear. Do you use them to document navigability? In case of doubt, remove them. If you want to document ownership of the association end, use the dot notation instead. (we cannot say if it’s right or wrong, since it’s a decision on how your model sees the associations)

In view of your comments and the third model linked therein, there are some key UML semantics you need to keep in mind:

• Inheritance is an ultra-strong relationship which means "is (always) a". In your example, you may say that an Actor is always a Person, and hence, everything you say about a Person is also true for an Actor. By the way, you should avoid repeating inherited properties or methods, since it could create some ambiguity.
• Inheritance is not a substitute for aggregation, composition or association. You can for example not say that a CrewMember (one person) is always a Crew (a group of persons). A CrewMember belongs to a Crew but there are things that the crew can do together that the individual member can't.
• Inheritance is not suitable if it's not always true. A Character for example may often be a Person. But not always;: you can have ghost characters, comic characters, robot characters, or animals.
• Association means that there is some structural relation between some instances of the associated classes. For example, that one ore several persons live in one city, seems a very relevant assocaition.
• Dependency means that a class is dependent on another, i.e. without the other class it would not work or something would be missing. It's a statement about the classes and not the objects. I.e. If you meant to say that Person is dependent on City you just say that the class Person would not work without knowing about City (for example, because the operation sendPostCardFrom(city: City) needs an argument of that type) but you do not say anything about persons X, Y and Z. If you want that X, Y and Z are related to city a, b, and c, you need an association.

About the model content, I'll not decide for you and there is no single truth. I therefore prefer to draw your attention at potential issues. I raise them in form of a question, up-to you to adjust the model based on your own answer:

• Common issues between the both variants:

  • Are Actor and Director really Persons ? In this case, what with the Persons that are Actors and Directors at the same time (g.g. Clint Eastwood) ? Or are Actor and Director just roles that a Persons takes for a given Movie ?
  • Is a Character really related only to 1 Movie? What to do with Indiana Jones, where the same character appears in several movies?
  • In a similar way, I wonder if there's really a single Person who lives in a City or if this should not be a many-to-many association?

• Issues regarding the differences: `

  • Is a Person in version 1 a Character (inheritance) ? Or is a Character a representation of a Person (association: represents) ?
  • Is a Character in version 2 really an Actor and by transitivity also a Person (inheritance)? Or is the Character only associated with an Actor (association: plays) ?

It's up to you to decide, but wherever I asked a question about association or inheritance, you should better think twice before using inheritance (i.e. prefer association/composition over inheritance)

in your where in the query, you have used the column 'id' which is existed in the product_relate_category table and products table, so the database can't determine exactly what column you mean ... in this case you should write the full column name:

EDIT

Here is the full implementation, based upon my initial answer. I changed the forEach() into map() as it is more suitable in this case.

You said "Check ins have many users", you seem to want the singular user for a check-in, but currently that would result in many users. It sounds like users check-in in a many to one relationship

Also $checkin->created_at will be by default a carbon object, so you can just go $checkin->created_at->format('jS F Y')

Also don't mix using compact and with, stay consistent and use only 1 as they achieve the same thing

Also $checkin->users()->name won't work, if you use the brackets on syntax is only returns a query builder instance, which you would need to call get on like $checkin->users()->get(), or you could use $checkin->users which will fetch them anyway. You may want to look into using with('relation') on query builder instances to stop N+1 queries if you want to dive a little deeper. Lastly $checkin->users()->get()->name also won't work as your user relation is many to many which returns a collection, which again points to you should have a belongsTo relationship called user without a pivot table

I would try this:

As you have many to one mapping in Appointment entity. you could write the below query in AppointmentRep

List findAllByPatientId(int id);

https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/jpa/docs/current/reference/html/#repositories.query-methods.query-creation

Parameter variation experiment should be ideal for what you need: https://anylogic.help/anylogic/experiments/parameter-variation.html#parameter-variation-experiment

Create a parameter in main for each measure you want to vary. Then, in the experiment's properties, you can specify the range and step to define the different values you want the parameters to take.

Then, when you run it, all possible combinations will be run.

To print title of every article under each tag and each page under the tag you can use this example: