consensus | Filecoin consensus work | Blockchain library

I am writing a snakemake to produce Sars-Cov-2 variants from Nanopore sequencing. The pipeline that I am writing is based on the artic network, so I am using artic guppyplex and artic minion.

The snakemake that I wrote has the following steps:

1. zip all the fastq files for all barcodes (rule zipFq)
2. perform read filtering with guppyplex (rule guppyplex)
3. call the artic minion pipeline (rule minion)
4. move the stderr and stdout from qsub to a folder under the working directory (rule mvQsubLogs)

Below is the snakemake that I wrote so far, which works

I want to build a consensus sequence from several sequences in python and I'm looking for the most efficient / most pythonic way to achieve this.

I have a list of strings like this:

I'm trying to add a new organization to Fabric's v2.2 test-network. When I execute the command (on configUpdate.sh; env vars are correctly setup):

I think I'm getting close but I can't figure out why my code isn't working as expected. I want to scrape the data from the first page, then click the next (arrow) button and move to the next page and do the same and so on until the next arrow button is greyed out, at which point the driver should quit. Any help would be much appreciated. Here is the code:

I'm looking for a way to add new members to existing Aeron cluster without reconfiguring existing ones.

It seems cluster members are defined statically during startup as described in the Cluster Tutorial:

When using google style docstrings and type annotations there's a double up of the type hints.

Is there any community consensus on how to avoid this?

Annoying double up of types:

I compiled the latest version of the node "basic-pow" from the substrate recipes, run the node using the command "./basic-pow --alice" so i have the authority role, but it never produces blocks, it prepared the first block but never imported it and that's it! Any idea how to debug this issue?!

I've been working on several projects lately as part of a job as developer for small startups and I've come across this question several times by now. What to do when you have an entity that consists of a planification and later the actual thing?

As an example let's think of a company wanting to have a record of all their security drills. Of course this means that someone will make a planification for a drill, perhaps choose a date and time for it and the people that will partake in it. This accounts for the planification of the entity. After a while the drill actually happens, and so we want to have a record of the actual date and time of the occurrence (to keep it simple, let's assume the people in the planification are always the same as the actual participants).

Example:

I've seen this same situation in lots of other practical examples, training planning and actual training, scheduled maintenance and actual maintenance, estimated budget and actual fees, etc. Sometimes we've solved this issues by using boolean attributes such as "planned", "done", "completed" or "approved" in one entity. Other times we used separate entities, but haven't quite reached a consensus of what is the better option.

What do you think would be the best option for this kind of problem? A PlanificationEntity and an actual Entity? Just a boolean?

I have a movieDetails.json database and the collection name is a movie then our teacher wants us to Display the number of movies based on the number of directors a movie has a. Hint you might have to use the javascript function split Since the director is not an array, it is only a string so I can't count how many directors are there because it will always come out as 1 since its a string so I want to split that string so that I can get an array so that I can count it. But unfortunately, I don't know the query that will solve this problem. ex. of expected output: