lwm | Latent World Models For Intrinsically Motivated Exploration | Machine Learning library
kandi X-RAY | lwm Summary
kandi X-RAY | lwm Summary
Latent World Models For Intrinsically Motivated Exploration | Official repository
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Train the model
- Stack frames
- Generate a masked mask from the done array
- Prepare the observation
- Compute the error for the given batch
- Inverse of the inverse function
- Forward a step
- Step grid in a grid
- Return the most recently created step
- Query the given indices
- Reset the experiment
- Generate the maze
- N - step Bellman target
- Pad x to a given dimension
- Handle key press events
- Load a configuration file
- Release key
- Append a step
- Creates a CNN
- Compute the loss function
- Render the map
- Create a scipy env
- Plot a series of points
- Forward a single observation
- Forward the given observation
- Load model
lwm Key Features
lwm Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lwm
QUESTION
I have a stream of user events. I've mapped them into KV{ userId, event }, and assigned timestamps.
This is to run in streaming mode. I would like to have be able to create the following input-output result:
session window gap=1
- input:
user=1, timestamp=1, event=a
- input:
user=2, timestamp=2, event=a
- input:
user=2, timestamp=3, event=a
- input:
user=1, timestamp=2, event=b
- time:
lwm=3
- output:
user=1, [ { event=a, timestamp=1 }, { event=b, timestamp=2 } ]
- time:
lwm=4
- output:
user=2, [ { event=a, timestamp=2 }, { event=a, timestamp=3 } ]
So that I can write my function to reduce thee list of events in the session window for the user as well as the start and end time of the session window.
How do I write this? (If you answer; "look at the examples", it's not a valid answer, because they never feed the list of events into the reducer with the window as a parameter)
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-02 at 12:48If I understand this correctly, this would be a follow-up to this question and naturally accomplished by adding the Group By Key step as I propose in my solution there.
So, referring to my previous explanation and focusing here on the changes only, if we have a pipeline like this:
QUESTION
If I make a POST request to a specific server using a Chrome plugin, I can see the "response body" comes back just fine in a JSOn format.
However when I try to do this with either "request" or "https.request", the "body" comes back as unicode which I can't seem to decipher. Anyone know how I can the body to come back as regular JSON, or how I could decipher this unicode? I tried a few stackoverflow solutions to decipher the unicode but no luck.
raw body:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-12 at 15:46The chrome plugin that you're using to POST is probably setting the content-type correctly, while your regular request from your server isn't.
Can you change your request so it includes
QUESTION
I have this two Dataset to plot:
lwm:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-08 at 17:30The problem
The xlabels change position due to set
.
set
by definition, is an unordered collection of distinct hashable object, but this not mean that is randomly ordered. (see here for details https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2860339/can-pythons-set-absence-of-ordering-be-considered-random-order).
So your output is correct.
The Solution
What do you need is to extract the labels based on your specification and then plot it.
For example using:
QUESTION
I have this function that GETs an object through RestTemplate.exchange()...
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-16 at 21:10I figured it out thanks to help from @AbhijitSarkar.
After debugging the status code, I found out I was being returned 5xx status codes every now and then. As you can see in the OP, only client exceptions were being caught. 5xx status codes are not caught here because they are server exceptions.
QUESTION
Here is the code below I am using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jul-25 at 23:41QUESTION
I have a RasterStack
s1
consisting of 400 layers with data from an island. The extent of the raster is cropped to the extent of the island, but due to its irregular shape, only around 20% of the pixels are actually land area and have data values; the other 80% are water and NA
.
I also have a land-water-mask lwm
(RasterLayer
), where land is coded as 1 and water as NA
.
I would like to do different kinds of cell-based calculations on s1
, but noticed that these take a long time to finish. To speed things up, the calculations should only be carried out for cells that are land area, whereas water areas should always be NA
. In pseudo-code:
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-22 at 08:55That's a tricky one and unfortunetely I don't have a straight forward solution for you.
You can either do multiple crops of the island (i.e. 2-3) to minimise NA values and do the calculcations separately on each cropped raster and mosaic the results.
Or another option is to do a parallel calculation, which will speed up the process significantly:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lwm
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page