verifier | asset store invoice verification discord bot | Application Framework library
kandi X-RAY | verifier Summary
kandi X-RAY | verifier Summary
A Unity (Unity3d) asset store invoice verification discord bot that allows users to verify their own asset store purchases and automatically assign discord permission/access to locked channels.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Validate an invoice
- Create OAuth POST request
- Make an OAuth query
- Enable wordpress
- Setup the connection
- Delete a WPS session
- Extract the OAuth access token from the response
- Setup userpress
- Add an invoice to the database
- Trim an invoice
- Create database tables
- Executes a SQL query against a database
- Deletes an invoice
- Search for an invoice
- Search a database by username
- Change the user
- Check email
- Returns True if invoice exists
- Get wordpress id
verifier Key Features
verifier Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 34License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
Copydef _verify_spec_compatible(input_name, spec_name, input_, spec):
"""Verifies that a symbol has a type compatible vith a given spec.
Here, compatibility is viewed in the general TensorFlow sense: that the dtypes
are the same after implicit con 
License : No LicenseCopy@Bean
public CodeVerifier codeVerifier(){
return new DefaultCodeVerifier(new DefaultCodeGenerator(), new SystemTimeProvider());
} Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on verifier
QUESTION
I'm using Firebase to send OTP on user mobile number, I'm implementing it into ReactJS. If first time I send OTP by clicking Button, it works fine, but if I click button more than 1 times without refreshing the page I get error "reCAPTCHA has already been rendered in this element".
I'm not able to find proper solution for this. I tried many other solutions, found by googling but no one worked for me. Your help/suggestions will be helpful for me. Thank you.
Firebase Code for sending OTP:-
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 08:10Issue resolved When I changed firebase code
from:-
QUESTION
Up until Linux 5.8 CAP_SYSADMIN was required to load any but the most basic BPF program. The recently introduced CAP_BPF is a welcome addition as it allows to run software leveraging BPF with less privileges.
Certain types of BPF programs can access packet data. The pre-4.7 way of doing it is via bpf_skb_load_bytes() helper. As the verifier got smarter, it became possible to perform "direct packet access", i.e. to access packet bytes by following pointers in the context structure. E.g:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-09 at 10:00To make direct packet accesses in your program, you will need CAP_PERFMON in addition to CAP_BPF. I'm not aware of any way around it.
Why?
Because of Spectre vulnerabilities, someone able to perform arithmetic on unbounded pointers (i.e., all except stack and map value pointers) can read arbitrary memory via speculative out-of-bounds loads.
Such operations thus need to be forbidden for unprivileged users. Allowing CAP_BPF users to perform those operations would essentially give read access to arbitrary memory to CAP_BPF. For those reasons, I doubt this limitation will be lifted in the future.
QUESTION
Room database is not working in mac book pro m1 i have already added id 'kotlin-kapt'
screen shoot of android studio console log
...
- What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':app:kaptDebugKotlin'.
A failure occurred while executing org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.internal.KaptWithoutKotlincTask$KaptExecutionWorkAction java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException (no error message)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at org.jetbrains.kotlin.kapt3.base.AnnotationProcessingKt.doAnnotationProcessing(annotationProcessing.kt:90) at org.jetbrains.kotlin.kapt3.base.AnnotationProcessingKt.doAnnotationProcessing$default(annotationProcessing.kt:31) at org.jetbrains.kotlin.kapt3.base.Kapt.kapt(Kapt.kt:45) ... 31 more
Caused by: java.lang.Exception: No native library is found for os.name=Mac and os.arch=aarch64. path=/org/sqlite/native/Mac/aarch64 at org.sqlite.SQLiteJDBCLoader.loadSQLiteNativeLibrary(SQLiteJDBCLoader.java:333) at org.sqlite.SQLiteJDBCLoader.initialize(SQLiteJDBCLoader.java:64) at androidx.room.verifier.DatabaseVerifier.(DatabaseVerifier.kt:71) ... 50 more
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-28 at 16:03Simply use Room 2.4.0-alpha03
QUESTION
Reason for app rejection on Play Store:
Your app(s) are using an unsafe implementation of the HostnameVerifier interface. You can find more information about how to resolve the issue in this Google Help Center article.
Hello All,
I'm getting a HostnameVerifier issue by google play console when I upload the app to the play store. I've tried each and every solution that I've found on StackOverflow, but still, the issue is the same i.e Your app(s) are using an unsafe implementation of the HostnameVerifier interface.
Also, I've gone through the google documentation for this issue but didn't get any luck. Does anyone have a solution regarding this? Every help is appreciated
Below is my ServiceGenerator class
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-26 at 05:39Actually, this issue was due to Braintree SDK which was using HostnamVerifier. I've gone through this GitHub issue channel for Braintree and came to know that they had resolved that issue and I just need to update the SDK version and again upload the bundle to the play store. This resolved my issue and was able to upload my app to the play store.
Whosoever is still looking for a better solution and didn't able to find it out anywhere then kindly go through this link and submit your issue details there, also please ask them to mention the name of the file which is causing this issue. They will revert you in the mail with the name of the file.
QUESTION
I'm using a script to automate a survey that I have to take every morning for work. When I run it it runs fine and it finishes without an issue. After running in the command prompt I keep getting this traceback error.
Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-14 at 20:45.admit-msg text-center is not a valid css-selectors.
You need to replace the space character with a dot i.e. .
Effectively, your line of coe will be:
QUESTION
When running equalsverfier in quarkus dev mode, equalsverfier tests fail.
I tried to test a class with equalsverifier. This works in my IDE. I tried to use it in quarkus dev mode (by running ./mvnw quarkus:dev), but then it fails with the following exception:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-03 at 15:31EqualsVerifier uses Objenesis to create instances of classes, and it keeps the same reference of the objenesis object around for performance reasons. It caches all the objects it has created before, so that makes things quicker when you want to create the same object over and over again, which EqualsVerifier tends to do.
However, EqualsVerifier keeps a static reference to objenesis, which means that it lives as long as the JVM does. It turns out that the Quarkus test runner can re-run the same tests again and again, and it creates a new class loader each time. But part of the equality of java.lang.Class is that the classloader that created the class, must also be the same. So it couldn't retrieve these objects from its cache anymore and returnd instances with classloaders that are now different from the other objects created in the test, and this caused the exceptions that you saw.
In version 3.8 of EqualsVerifier (created as a result of this StackOverflow post), this issue can be avoided by adding #withResetCaches() like this:
QUESTION
We're trying to upgrade spring boot version to 2.6.0 and faced up with "Spring Boot [2.6.0] is not compatible with this Spring Cloud release train" (when running integration tests).
In additional
spring-cloud.version = 2020.0.4
We're using org.springframework.cloud (spring-cloud-context & spring-cloud-commons) 3.0.4
And have (also) this block in the pom:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-23 at 07:45It will be released on November 30 2021. See https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-release/milestones?direction=asc&sort=due_date&state=open
QUESTION
I've written a couple production BPF agents, but my approach is very iterative until I please the verifier and can move on. I've reached my limit again.
Here's a program that works if I have one fewer && condition -- and breaks otherwise. The confusing part is that the warning implies that 103 insns is greater-than at most 4096 insns. There's obviously something I'm misunderstanding about how this is all strung together.
My ultimate goal is to do logging based on a process' environment -- so alternative approaches are welcome. :)
Error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-29 at 09:48bpf: Argument list too long. Program too large (103 insns), at most 4096 insns
Looking at the error message, my guess would be that your program has 103 instructions and it's rejected because it's too complex. That is, the verifier gave up before analyzing all instructions on all paths.
On Linux 5.15 with a privileged user, the verifier gives up after reading 1 million instructions (the complexity limit). Since it has to analyze all paths through the program, a program with a small number of instructions can have a very high complexity. That's particularly the case when you have loops and many conditions, as is your case.
Why is the error message confusing? This error message is coming from libbpf.c:
QUESTION
I would like to verify that every onNext emission matches the given predicate.
I tried expectNextMatches:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-26 at 14:50There's an operator for that:
QUESTION
I have MyModel with:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-29 at 08:55You can do it by creating an instance of ActionDispatch::Http::UploadedFile. This is basically just a wrapper around a tempfile instance which Rails uses internally when dealing with file uploads.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install verifier
Determine how you would like things to actually operate. Do you have a single asset and would like 3 locked channels? Do you have multiple assets and you want each one verified individually and different channels for each asset? If you just have one asset and want verification of that asset to grant access to a few locked channels: Create a role within the server settings of Discord by clicking on the drop down menu above your servers name and select "Server Settings" and then fine the "Roles" menu tab. There is a little plus(+) symbol you can press in order to create a new role. Typically naming the role "Verified" is common practice as it is easy to tell what it is for. If you right click in the channels area you can create a channel category and set it to private and the select your "Verfied" role. Any channels you create in this private category will automatically inherit the permissions of the category. Next create the channels you wish to have, such as "Support", "Downloads", or whatever you wish, if they are made in a private category they should have the permissions applied, but if you decide you do not want the channels all to be within the same category you can make the channel anywhere, you just have to make sure you turn on the "Private Channel" option when creating the channel, this will remove the base general permissions from the start. Once "Private Channel" is selected it will allow you to add your newly created role to the channels and this will give the "Text Permissions" to the channel, such as ability to read messages (present and past) and give the ability to chat in the channels. If you have multiple assets and would like individual permissions and channels per asset: The steps for this are similar to the ones above except you will want to create the "Verified" role, but then also create a role with a name corresponding to each asset. ex. If you have 2 assets (My Asset 1 and My Asset 2) make one "Verified" role and then one role for each asset such as (asset1 and asset2) It is ideal to create a category for each asset and only apply the role that is specific to that asset to the category. ex. If the category is for asset1, do not apply the "Verified" role as well as the role of asset1, only apply asset1 role. This is because anyone who verifies ownership of any asset will get the "Verified" role as well as the role for the asset they verified. This is to allow for shared channels for anyone who is a purchaser of at least one of your assets but then also specific support or download channels. Once you have your channels and roles setup how you would like them, move on to step 2.
The next step will be starting up Verifier. Depending on if you are running on Linux or Windows. it will either be a binary file called "Verifier" or "Verifier.exe" respectively.** 6. EDIT (I originally intended on this being a compiled application, which it could be still as I have included the setup file and .spec files to compile with pyinstaller, but it is suffecient to simply run python3 __main__.py from the root directory once the configs are setup. (must be python 3.7))
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
