dml | Machine Learning is a machine learning | Machine Learning library

I afraid that the answer is no, there isn't a way to configure Azure Audit and filter what to capture and not to capture in the audit.

Azure SQL database Auditing doesn't provide the way to customize the audit actives.

HTH.

Should anyone get the same error in the future, here is what we were told by the AWS tech specialist:

There is a known (to AWS) issue with the pglogical plugin. The solution requires using the test_decoding plugin instead.

1. Enforce using the test_decoding plugin on the DMS Endpoint by specifying pluginName=test_decoding in Extra Connection Attributes
2. Create a new DMS task using this endpoint (using the old task may cause it to fail due to dissynchronization between the task and the logs)

It sure did resolve the issue, but we still don't know what the problem really was with the plugin that is strongly suggested everywhere in the DMS documentation (at the moment).

Two steps:

1. Find any file named as "numpy.py" in your script directory and change it into another name.

2. Delete any file named as "numpy.pyc" or any other file generated while compiling your code.

There are a lot of choices out there and which is best will depend on many factors including your team's skillset and your budget. I'll let the community weigh in on all the possibilities.

I would like to advise on using the AWS serverless ecosystem to perform these functions. First off the Lambda limit is now 15 min but this really isn't important. The most important development is Redshift Data API which lets you start queries in a Lambda and for other Lambdas check on completion later. See: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/mgmt/data-api.html

With Redshift Data API for fire-and-forget access to Redshift and Step Functions to orchestrate the Lambda functions you can create a low cost, light weight infrastructure to perform all sort of integrations and actions. These can include triggering other tools / services as needed for you. This is not the best approach in all cases but Lambda based solutions should not be excluded due to run time limits.

The easiest way - just to convert your 'pattern tree' to regexp, and then check text representation of your 'actual tree' with that regexp.

Regarding the Recursive descent. Recursive descent itself is enough to perform the grammar check, but not very effective, because sometimes you need to check pattern from beginning multiple times. To make single-pass grammar checker you need state machine as well, and that is what Regexp has under the hood.

So no need to reinvent the wheel, just specify your 'pattern' as regexp (either convert your representation of the pattern to regexp)

Your

Creating an index does NOT block other users from reading the table. In general, almost no Oracle DDL commands will prevent users from reading tables.

There are some DDL statements that can cause problems for readers. For example, if you TRUNCATE a table, other users who are in the middle of reading that table may get the error ORA-08103: Object No Longer Exists. But that's a very destructive change that we would expect to cause problems. I recently found a specific type of foreign key constraint that blocked reading the table, but that was likely a rare bug. I've caused a lot of production problems while adding objects, but so far I've never seen adding an index prevent users from reading the table.

You query works fine in parallel with partition-wise join:

• You do not need to call createCache explicitly because CREATE TABLE will also create a cache:
• SQL_PUBLIC_TABLENAME is the correct cache name. You can customize it by using CREATE TABLE (...) WITH "cache_name=PreferredNameForCache"
• If you are going to have a single-column value of primitive type, you should use CREATE TABLE (...) WITH "wrap_value=false". Then scan query will also work.

The solution turns out to be adding insertable = false, updatable = false to @Column annotation on entryId. How can I retrieve the foreign key from a JPA ManyToOne mapping without hitting the target table?