consider | ThinkGear protocol used by NeuroSky devices | Parser library

In your package.json, or jest.config.js/jest.config.js, change the value of the testEnvironment property to jsdom.

After a few days of struggle, I ended up switching to Bundle. It achieves the same purpose for me and it actually works so... That's my solution here.

Possible solution

Upgrade google analytics to firebase analaytics. Hope it'll solve your problems.Also upgrade all the library what're you using.

For me below solutions solve the problem.

Add PendingIntent.FLAG_IMMUTABLE to your pending intents.

Here is an example -

PendingIntent pendingIntent = PendingIntent.getActivity(this, alarmID, notificationIntent, PendingIntent.FLAG_IMMUTABLE);

For further information follow this link - https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/PendingIntent#FLAG_IMMUTABLE

Update the Rust to satisfy the new edition 2021.

rustup default nightly && rustup update

Thanks to @ken. Yes, you can use the stable channel too!

But I love nightly personally.

NA is a statistical or data integrity concept: the idea of a "missing value". Eg if your data comes from people filling in forms, a bad entry or missing entry would be treated as NA.

NaN is a numerical or computational concept: something that is "not a number". Eg 0/0 is NAN, because the result of this computation is undefined (but note that 1/0 is Inf, or infinity, and similarly -1/0 is -Inf).

The way that R handles these concepts internally isn't something that you should ever be concerned about.

Updated answer 2021-11-16:

The following is mentioned in the official release notes for Chrome 96.

To disable Length Authoring Tools, navigate to this location in the DevTools and uncheck the checkbox:
Settings > Experiments > Enable CSS length authoring tools in the Styles pane.

The initial incentive to disable these tools has been greatly diminished because of this.

A chevron will now appear to the right of the hovered value instead of reacting to clicks to the entire unit portion of it.

Copy paste now also works as intended.

Conclusion:
It is now possible to disable the Length Authoring Tools, but you might no longer need to.

Old answer:

Fixes have been added to Chromium ( [1], [2], [3] ) that are slowly making their way to the stable release of Chrome.

But help is on its way...

Chrome 96 is scheduled to be released on November 16 2021 (source), or ~3 weeks after October 28 according to this official tweet. It will at least contain a revert to free text editing of css properties (source). Hopefully version 96 will address the issue completely, but if it doesn't then the next major release is scheduled for January 4 2021 (If this issue is unresolved by then somebody at Google should be fired).

As for now, Chrome Canary seems to have these fixes implemented and might be considered an alternative solution to the issue if you find the current state of Length Authoring Tools unbearable.

Please be advised that Chrome Canary can be quite unstable.

This question and answer will be edited and corrected once there are real fixes in the live stable version.

For C. The program is valid. The only requirement that applies here is "strict aliasing rule" saying that the object can be accessed only via a l-value of a compatible type (+ a few exception described in 6.5p7).

The compatibility of structures/unions defined in separate translation units is defined in 6.2.7p1.

... two structure, union, or enumerated types declared in separate translation units are compatible if their tags and members satisfy the following requirements: If one is declared with a tag, the other shall be declared with the same tag. If both are completed anywhere within their respective translation units, then the following additional requirements apply: there shall be a one-to-one correspondence between their members such that each pair of corresponding members are declared with compatible types; if one member of the pair is declared with an alignment specifier, the other is declared with an equivalent alignment specifier; and if one member of the pair is declared with a name, the other is declared with the same name. For two structures, corresponding members shall be declared in the same order. For two structures or unions, corresponding bit-fields shall have the same widths. For two enumerations, corresponding members shall have the same values.

Therefore the structures are not compatible in the example.

However, it is not an issue because the f object is created and accessed via locally defined type. UB would be invoked if the object was created with Foo type defined in one translation unit and accessed via other Foo type in the other translation unit:

The code shown is valid (all C++ Standard versions, I believe). The similar restrictions are all listed in [reserved.names]. Since read is not declared in the C++ standard library, nor in the C standard library, nor in older versions of the standard libraries, and is not otherwise listed there, it's fair game as a name in the global namespace.

So is it an implementation defect that it won't link with -static? (Not a "compiler bug" - the compiler piece of the toolchain is fine, and there's nothing forbidding a warning on valid code.) It does at least work with default settings (though because of how the GNU linker doesn't mind duplicated symbols in an unused object of a dynamic library), and one could argue that's all that's needed for Standard compliance.

We also have at [intro.compliance]/8

A conforming implementation may have extensions (including additional library functions), provided they do not alter the behavior of any well-formed program. Implementations are required to diagnose programs that use such extensions that are ill-formed according to this International Standard. Having done so, however, they can compile and execute such programs.

We can consider POSIX functions such an extension. This is intentionally vague on when or how such extensions are enabled. The g++ driver of the GCC toolset links a number of libraries by default, and we can consider that as adding not only the availability of non-standard #include headers but also adding additional translation units to the program. In theory, different arguments to the g++ driver might make it work without the underlying link step using libc.so. But good luck - one could argue it's a problem that there's no simple way to link only names from the C++ and C standard libraries without including other unreserved names.

(Does not altering a well-formed program even mean that an implementation extension can't use non-reserved names for the additional libraries? I hope not, but I could see a strict reading implying that.)

So I haven't claimed a definitive answer to the question, but the practical situation is unlikely to change, and a Standard Defect Report would in my opinion be more nit-picking than a useful clarification.

But what could be the purpose of operator auto() = delete?

What would be the purpose of the following function?