on-policy | official implementation of Multi-Agent PPO | Reinforcement Learning library

by marlbenchmark Python Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | on-policy Summary

on-policy is a Python library typically used in Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning applications. on-policy has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

This is the official implementation of Multi-Agent PPO (MAPPO).

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

on-policy has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 805 star(s) with 207 fork(s). There are 7 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 9 open issues and 54 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 44 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of on-policy is current.

Quality

on-policy has no bugs reported.

Security

on-policy has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

on-policy is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

on-policy releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Build file is available. You can build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed on-policy and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into on-policy implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Get configuration
Perform a single action
Build a move from a dictionary
Return the player s play move
Return the discard move for a card
Reset the player
Generate recurrent generator
Run the simulation
Returns the values for the critic
Log training data
Compute return values
Returns the size of the state agent
Create a Hanabi environment
Runs the learning loop
Generate the recurrent generator
Run the network
Determine the position of an agent
Reset the game
Render the network
Make a World instance
Calculate the visibility matrix for all agents
Parse command line arguments
Inserts a new observation
Choose an insertion
Returns a dict representation of the move
Updates the model

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

on-policy Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for on-policy.

on-policy Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for on-policy.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on on-policy

How to set TTL on Hazelcast cache map with spring cacheble

"Error with Permissions-Policy header" getting after Chrome update

Istio Authorization polices for memcached

GCP policy inheritance understanding conflict

Restricting key creation for specific GCP Service account in specific project belonging to an organization

How to update the SSL negotiation policy in using the Troposhpere framework for an AWS classic load balancer 443 listener

What are the requirements to comply with the background location rules from the Play Store?

Combining AWS cli commands with xargs not working

Does "Domain Restricted Sharing" in GCP prevent service accounts from getting IAM permissions?

How to create a secret in Google Cloud Secret Manager by Terraform?

QUESTION

How to set TTL on Hazelcast cache map with spring cacheble

Asked 2021-May-28 at 12:47

I am using Hazelcast cluster cache with spring boot. I am using the 4.2 version of hazelcast.

Caching is working fine but it doesn't evict the data from the cache map after TTL. Always keeping the same data. I tried a lot of ways of setting ttl but didn't get any success.

Here is my chance config class

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-28 at 12:47

There are two topologies in which you can use Hazelcast: Embedded and Client-Server. Your Java Spring configuration configures Hazelcast Client, however your hazelcast.yaml is dedicated for the Embedded mode.

Try to either use your hazelcast.yaml configuration in your Hazelcast server. Or configure your cache in the Hazelcast client, for example, like this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67720942

QUESTION

"Error with Permissions-Policy header" getting after Chrome update

Asked 2021-May-27 at 11:32

Getting following error from the console window after updating the chrome to version 88.0.4324.104

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-26 at 10:53

I had this same problem and it was solved this way:

The way you are creating the permissions policy is different.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65882032

QUESTION

Istio Authorization polices for memcached

Asked 2021-Apr-05 at 09:12

I am very new to Istio Authorization policies, I need some help with setting up authorization policies :

Here is the scenario:

I have a namespace called namespace1 which has 4 Microservices running in them. For the context, let's call them A,B,C,D. And all 4 microservices have istio-sidecar injection enabled.
have a namespace called namespace2 which has 2 Microservices running in them. For the context, let's call them E,F. And both microservices have istio-sidecar injection enabled.
Now I have deployed Memcached service by following Memcached using mcrouter to namespace memcached. And all the pods of Memcached are also having istio-sidecar injection enabled.

Now I have a scenario where I have to allow only calls from B and C microservices in namespace1 to be made to memcached services and deny calls from A and D in namespace1 along with calls coming from any other namespaces. Is it possible to achieve this using istio authorization policies?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-05 at 09:08

You can also use principals for allowing access. As for the example from the Istio documentation on Authorization Policy:

so analogously something like that should be possible:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66950139

QUESTION

GCP policy inheritance understanding conflict

Asked 2021-Mar-30 at 04:09

According to this https://medium.com/@bekahlundy/google-cloud-platform-fundamentals-for-aws-professionals-week-2-bbee857472f5 Policies are a union of those applied on the resource itself and those inherited from higher levels in the hierarchy. If a parent policy is less restrictive, it overrides a more restrictive policy applied on the resource. If a parent policy is more restrictive, it does not override a less restrictive policy applied on the resource. Therefore, access granted at a higher level in the hierarchy cannot be taken away by policies applied at a lower level in the hierarchy.

But according to the diagram here https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/understanding-hierarchy Parent allows red+green, child denies green, and the result is red?

Seems to conflict. Appreciate any input. Thanks!

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Mar-30 at 04:09

The article in Medium refers to the Roles in IAM while the GCP documentation you are looking at is referring to the Custom policy.

The article in Medium is still correct since it is referring to a pre defined role which is the Owner.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66862436

QUESTION

Restricting key creation for specific GCP Service account in specific project belonging to an organization

Asked 2021-Mar-22 at 13:46

I have a requirement where I want to restrict certain service account from creating key (json/yaml file) but that restriction should only affect specific service account in a specific project which belongs to an organization.

I did go through the following documentation, but It did not match the requirement of restricting only certain service account rather than all service account in that particular organization.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 13:46

As far as I know, you can only restrict key creation on project level.
Based on you configuration, in may be viable to restrict user's access to a Service Account - link.
Another workaround would be to split your resources into smaller projects, so that they are easier to manage.

If you think that policy restricting key creation for only selected service accounts should be available, you can file a Feature Request on Google Public Issue Tracker.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66744736

QUESTION

How to update the SSL negotiation policy in using the Troposhpere framework for an AWS classic load balancer 443 listener

Asked 2021-Feb-26 at 15:24

I have a working Troposphere template that brings up my environment with a classic load balancer. I am modifying it to have the load balancer port 443 listener come up using the SSL Negotiation policy(cypher) ELBSecurityPolicy-TLS-1-2-2017-01.

It will let me generate the cloudformation yaml but when I try to create the stack using the generated yaml I get the error "Encountered unsupported property PolicyType" while it is trying to create the load balancer.

PolicyType is supported by Troposphere but not in AWS CF??

Any clues as to what I am doing wrong? Is there a better way?

I can not find any examples of updating the SSL negotiation using the Troposphere framework.

Here is the snippet of my Troposphere ELB listener code section that I think should do the magic -

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 06:18

The Classic Load Balancer Policies should be specified under the Policies property, not the Listeners property. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-properties-ec2-elb.html#cfn-ec2-elb-policies

Remove the elb.Policy( ... ) from the Listerners=[ ...] property and add the Policies = [ elb.Policy( ... ), ... ] property to the LoadBalancer resource / object.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66376888

QUESTION

What are the requirements to comply with the background location rules from the Play Store?

Asked 2021-Feb-06 at 20:27

I have a similar issue to this post How to make my Android app comply with the "Background Location Policy" but that post doesn't have an answer.

I have a web browser app, which on occasion will ask for location permissions if the user visits a website that requests that. App targets API 29. The app manifest has which is API 23 and higher because I didn't want to force location permission on older phones.

Today I got an email saying I have until March to fix this, but I don't understand what I have to do, I'm not requesting background location anywhere.

Anyone have any idea what I have to do?

Edit: I have read the help center, and I'm wondering if that my issue is the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, maybe something is accessing it on the background. I don't know how I would prevent ad networks from that if they do it. I already pause the WebViews the app is not on the foreground so websites should not be using it.

Edit2: Is there maybe a way I can log background location access so that I can monitor my app a few days to see if it happens?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Feb-06 at 20:27

I would like to answer my own question in case someone else is searching for this. I can't say that I know for certain this is correct but it has worked for me so far.

First, on this answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65894488/704836 I was told to use AppOpsManager to log background location requests. After doing that I found a few places where that takes places. I will discuss those below:

Ad networks. I have ad network initialization on my Application.onCreate() and a lot of those accessed location. So when triggering a BroadcastReceiver, they would check location.
WifiManager.getConnectionInfo() - this will trigger a location request. Same deal as above, I had one of those on Application.onCreate().

After removing those calls the Play store stopped complaining.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65709229

QUESTION

Combining AWS cli commands with xargs not working

Asked 2021-Jan-24 at 20:05

I want to have a one liner for setting properties to AWS Cloudwatch loggroups. I came across the xargs command. But I do not understand what am I doing wrong:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-24 at 19:07

aws logs describe-log-groups | \
 jq ".logGroups[].logGroupName" \
 |xargs -I {} -n 1  aws logs put-retention-policy \
  --log-group-name {} --retention-in-days 14

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65874236

QUESTION

Does "Domain Restricted Sharing" in GCP prevent service accounts from getting IAM permissions?

Asked 2021-Jan-11 at 04:39

If I turn on the Organization Policy constraint "Domain Restricted Sharing" (doc) and set it to allow only my org domain foo.com, will this prevent the slew of platform service accounts from getting their IAM permissions granted? For instance, accounts in the domain @iam.gserviceaccount.com or @developer.gserviceaccount.com. These service accounts get provisioned and given permissions all over the place. My worry is that enabling "Domain Restricted Sharing" will block these accounts from having IAM access.

Another way to ask this is: does "Domain Restricted Sharing" ignore these sorts of platform-based service accounts? If it doesn't, I feel like it would be difficult to maintain a list of exceptions.

A more fundamental question - does "Domain Restricted Sharing" only apply to Cloud Identity / Google Workspace accounts, and is hence not relevant when it comes to service accounts?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-10 at 23:46

In this answer I am using the term Google Cloud Identities meaning identities such as service accounts, service agents, etc. that are created by Google Cloud and not by other Google services such as Gmail.

If turn on the Organization Policy constraint "Domain Restricted Sharing" ...

No. The policy constraint will not affect Google Cloud Identities such as service accounts. If this were the case, your projects would soon collapse and fail.

A more fundamental question - does "Domain Restricted Sharing" only apply to Cloud Identity / Google Workspace accounts, and is hence not relevant when it comes to service accounts?

Domain Restricted Sharing applies to all non Google Cloud Identities such a Google Workspace, Cloud Identity and Gmail style accounts. You can define members of a domain managed/controlled by Google Workspace as being allowed (me@example.com) while identities that are not part of that domain (me@gmail.com) are blocked.

At this time, only domains managed by Google Workspace are supported. Cloud Identity is not supported for specifying an allowed domain unless the domain name is also the organization name. (Note: I cannot find an authoritative reference for this statement and this may change in the future).

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65657720

QUESTION

How to create a secret in Google Cloud Secret Manager by Terraform?

Asked 2021-Jan-07 at 12:17

This is official page: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/google/latest/docs/resources/secret_manager_secret

I created these files:

variables.tf

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-07 at 11:28

I found the following article that I consider to be usefull on Managing Secret Manager with Terraform

You have to :

Create the Setup
Create a file named versions.tf that define the version constraints.
Create a file named main.tf and configure the Google provider stanza:

This is the code for creating a Secret Manager secret named "my-secret" with an automatic replication policy:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65608689

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install on-policy

Here we give an example installation on CUDA == 10.1. For non-GPU & other CUDA version installation, please refer to the PyTorch website. Even though we provide requirement.txt, it may have redundancy. We recommend that the user try to install other required packages by running the code and finding which required package hasn't installed yet.
download SMAC Maps, and move it to ~/StarCraftII/Maps/. To use a stableid, copy stableid.json from https://github.com/Blizzard/s2client-proto.git to ~/StarCraftII/.
download SMAC Maps, and move it to ~/StarCraftII/Maps/.
To use a stableid, copy stableid.json from https://github.com/Blizzard/s2client-proto.git to ~/StarCraftII/.
There are 3 Cooperative scenarios in MPE:.
simple_spread
simple_speaker_listener, which is 'Comm' scenario in paper
simple_reference