ARS | An implementation of the Augmented Random Search algorithm | Reinforcement Learning library

You can pass the Temporal.PlainDateTime object directly to Intl.DateTimeFormat, or indirectly by using Temporal.Calendar.prototype.toLocaleString(). This should save you from having to split the string to remove the brackets.

(A good rule of thumb is that if you find yourself doing string manipulation with the output of toString() from any Temporal object, or using new Date() for that matter, it's probably a sign that there's a Temporal method you should be using instead.)

One caveat is that you have to make sure that the calendar of the locale matches the calendar of the date you are formatting. You can't use toLocaleString() or Intl.DateTimeFormat to do calendar conversion (unless it is from the ISO 8601 calendar). So you should use the withCalendar() method to convert the date to the calendar you want to output it in, as well as making sure the calendar in the Intl options matches it.

Here's my attempt at such a function:

The problem is: in RealityKit 2.0 we don't have access to the Reality Composer's behaviors (except notification), and the anchor type – we know that it's AnchorEntity(.image) – you assigned in Reality Composer works the same way as ARKit's image anchor in ARImageTrackingConfig, i.e. it uses local tracking instead of global tracking. In other words, hardly you get such a scenario with current Reality Composer scene.

Try ARKit and its ARWorldTrackingConfig for image tracking. All the "behaviors" must be recreated from scratch in RealityKit or in SceneKit.

A possible solution:

There are three possible reasons for the "off by one" date problems you're seeing:

1. Time zone mismatch between date initialization and date formatting
2. Using the wrong variation of the Islamic calendar (JS implementations typically offer 5 different Islamic calendars!)
3. Bugs in the ICU library used for JS's calendar calculations

I'll cover each of these below.

1. Time zone mismatch between date initialization and date formatting

The most common reason for off-by-one-day errors is (as @RobG noted in his comments above) a mismatch between the time zone used when declaring the Date value and the time zone used when formatting it in your desired calendar.

When you initialize a Date instance using an ISO 8601 string, the actual value stored in the Date instance is the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970 UTC. Depending on your system time zone, new Date('2022-02-03') can be February 3 or February 2 in your system time zone. One way to evade this problem is to use UTC when formatting too:

When you specify an axis, np.unique returns unique subarrays indexed along this axis. To see is better, assume that one of the rows repeats:

• In your situation, it seems that the values of sku of container is not existing in the values of sku of data_obj. I thought that the reason for your issue might be due to this.
• As a script for checking this, you can use const res = container.filter(e => !data_obj[e.sku]) for your script. In this case, [ { sku: 'L4943-0ULT', id: 3195, price: '5083.33' } ] is returned. When this value is searched from your sample Spreadsheet, l4943-0ult is found. In this case, the character case is different. By this, your issue occurs. I resulted in the reason of your issue is due to this.

When this issue was removed, how about the following modification?

I rewrote your code with some better ways to create table. My idea was to pick out the buttons that fell onto a range of type and then loop through those buttons and change its color to those type.

You could use Array.prototype.join() and \n as a separator :

Does it make sense to iterate through layers like this and keep adding files (to some target, does not matter for now) and deleting the added files in case they are found with a .wh prefix? Or am I totally off and is there a much better way?

There is a much better way, you do not want to reimplement (with worse performances) what Docker already does. The main reason is that Docker uses a mount filesystem called overlay2 by default that allows the creation of images and containers leveraging the concepts of a Union Filesystem: lowerdir, upperdir, workdir and mergeddir.

What you might not expect is that you can reproduce an image or container building process using the mount command available in almost any Unix-like machine.

I found a very interesting article that explains how the overlay storage system works and how Docker internally uses it, I highly recommend the reading.

Actually, if you have read the article, the solution is there: you can mount the image data you have by docker inspecting its LowerDir, UpperDir, WorkDir and by setting the merged dir to a custom path. To make the process simpler, you can run a script like: