unification

 by   mrocklin Python Version: 0.2.2 License: Non-SPDX

kandi X-RAY | unification Summary

kandi X-RAY | unification Summary

unification is a Python library. unification has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available and it has high support. However unification has 1 bugs and it has a Non-SPDX License. You can install using 'pip install unification' or download it from GitHub, PyPI.

unification
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              unification has a highly active ecosystem.
              It has 67 star(s) with 11 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are no pull requests.
              OutlinedDot
              It has a negative sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of unification is 0.2.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              unification has 1 bugs (0 blocker, 0 critical, 1 major, 0 minor) and 12 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              unification has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              unification code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 1 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              unification has a Non-SPDX License.
              Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              unification releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in PyPI.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              It has 599 lines of code, 105 functions and 14 files.
              It has high code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed unification and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into unification implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Perform topological sort of edges .
            • Context manager to context manager .
            • A decorator to define a class .
            • Unify an object .
            • reify an object
            • Convert d into a frozen dict .
            • Reverse a dictionary .
            • Unify u and v .
            • reify e in s
            • Match a function .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            unification Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for unification.

            unification Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for unification.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            behaviour of Isabelle foldl compared to SML
            Asked 2022-Apr-08 at 16:52

            being a beginner of Isabelle I tried to transcribe a simple programming task from rosettacode.org 100 doors based on the Standard ML implementation.

            I checked the SML code in this online SML interpreter and especially the call of foldl, which worked fine.

            When applying Isabelle's foldl i get an 'Type unification failed' error for function run, which is unexpected, since i tried to transcribe the SML original very closely. Any hints for what the problem is? Thanks a lot!

            My code so far:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Apr-08 at 16:52

            Let's compare the Isabelle version of foldl,

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71798268

            QUESTION

            Can the unification algorithm in Prolog recurse infinitely?
            Asked 2022-Feb-01 at 20:04

            I am using swi-prolog to produce some examples for students in the context of a Prolog course. Regarding unification I want to draw their attention to the dangers of infinite recursion in the unification process. However, mature Prolog implementations like swi-prolog are smart enough to avoid infinite recursion of the unification process in most cases. Is this true in all cases, or can more intricate examples be constructed where unification would still recurse infinitely?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-30 at 18:05

            Is this true in all cases, or can more intricate examples be constructed where unification would still recurse infinitely?

            AFAIK no.

            I can't recall seeing where =/2 did not work as expected. Granted my expectations are of how SWI-Prolog does =/2 as noted below.

            As a related side-question, why does (again, I used swi-prolog) unification binds X to Y in the following example? I didn't expect that.

            See these comments in the SWI-Prolog C code for cyclic terms.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70914323

            QUESTION

            Implementation of forward chaining in prolog (SWI-Prolog)
            Asked 2022-Jan-28 at 20:37

            I would like to implement forward-chaining reasoning in Prolog. I made up a simple KB of facts and some rules, from which I should be able to get the fact green(fritz). I tried to implement it but somehow, when member fails, it stops going on.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-24 at 22:11

            There are several problems here.

            Problem 1 is that the non-recursive clauses for your recursive predicates look like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70821997

            QUESTION

            Returning the right number of islands using Union Find
            Asked 2022-Jan-13 at 08:53

            I am solving a question on LeetCode.com called Number of Islands:

            Given an m x n 2D binary grid grid which represents a map of '1's (land) and '0's (water), return the number of islands. An island is surrounded by water and is formed by connecting adjacent lands horizontally or vertically. You may assume all four edges of the grid are all surrounded by water.

            I know how to solve it with DFS, but I am learning union-find and came up with the below approach:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 08:53

            Add some debug print shows some issues in union: Demo.

            Changing to:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70676083

            QUESTION

            What happens to the non user-id sessions?
            Asked 2022-Jan-11 at 14:57

            I'm a newbie at GA and I can't seem to find the answer to this question (apologies for any unintended duplicate). I understood what it means to set up a user-id and what's session unification. What I don't really understand is what happens to the non user-id view when the user-id view is created. I mean: it stays there, but does it keep collecting data ignoring the user-id or does it ignore the user-id assigned sessions?

            I hope it's an understandable question!

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 12:38

            Nothing happens, the standard view collects sessions normally. In the user-ID view, on the other hand, only hits that contain the user-ID are collected.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70666573

            QUESTION

            How to make Isabelle use basic math rules?
            Asked 2021-Oct-22 at 18:44

            I'm trying to learn Isabelle:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-22 at 16:05

            algebra_simps is a list of common math rules. Adding it solves the problem:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69678548

            QUESTION

            Flink: Left join equivalent of Dataset API in Batch mode of DataStream API?
            Asked 2021-Sep-30 at 17:58

            It has been mentioned in Flink docs that DataSet API will be deprecated in future. So I am looking into prototyping this Dataset API to DataStream API in Batch Mode (which I believe is in Beta right now) migration.

            We have this(similar) code in our codebase that uses leftOuterJoin on a DataSet.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 17:58

            The relational operations on DataSets (e.g., joins) are being deprecated in favor of using the relational operations offered by the Table/SQL API, which is fully interoperable with the DataStream API.

            See https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/dev/table/tableapi/#joins and https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/dev/table/sql/queries/joins/.

            You can either use Table connectors and perform a join directly on the tables they produce, or convert datastreams to tables before performing the join. And you can convert from tables back to datastreams if needed for further processing. Given the table/stream duality, these "conversions" don't really cost anything. See https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/dev/table/data_stream_api/.

            FWIW, Flink 1.14 was just released, and it includes a number of improvements related to this topic. In particular, only in 1.14 (and beyond) can you combine the Table API with the DataStream API in batch execution mode.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69381784

            QUESTION

            Is it possible to turn unification errors into goals in Coq?
            Asked 2021-Sep-17 at 23:31

            I've been working on a formalization for a process calculus in Coq (repository here), and constantly find myself trying to apply a function which fails because of equivalent, but syntactically different, subterms. This often happens because of manipulation of de Bruijn variables. As unification fails, I'll usually just replace misbehaving subterms explictly beforehand and then apply the function I need. A simple code as an example of what I mean:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-17 at 23:31

            applys_eq from Programming Language Foundations' LibTactics will accomplish that. From the documentation (as of Version 6.1 of the book):

            applys_eq H helps proving a goal of the form P x1 .. xN from an [sic] hypothesis H that concludes P y1 .. yN, where the arguments xi and yi may or may not be convertible. Equalities are produced for all arguments that don't unify.

            The tactic invokes equates on all arguments, then calls applys K, and attempts reflexivity on the side equalities.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69229094

            QUESTION

            Deploy war file in Payara 5 Docker container
            Asked 2021-Sep-10 at 15:45

            I'm having trouble getting my war file to deploy on application start.

            According to the docs here:

            The following sample Dockerfile can be used to prepare a custom Payara Server image that deploys the myapplication.war artefact at runtime:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 15:45

            This issue should be fixed in the next release, version 5.2021.7. There has already been an issue raised on GitHub here and an accompanying PR here

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69117678

            QUESTION

            Defining a predicate; need prop=>bool
            Asked 2021-Jul-14 at 08:00

            I'm trying to define a function that takes a set and a relation and returns a bool telling if the relation is reflexive on the set. I tried to define it like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jul-14 at 08:00

            You need to write it such that the value is not prop in the first place — there's no conversion. In this case, you used the prop-level implication between ∀x. x ∈ A and (x, x) ∈ R. You may use a single-width arrow --> instead, which is an implication of bools.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68371185

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install unification

            You can install using 'pip install unification' or download it from GitHub, PyPI.
            You can use unification like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            Install
          • PyPI

            pip install unification

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/mrocklin/unification.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone mrocklin/unification

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:mrocklin/unification.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link