Autoheal | Auto restart distribute services from power cut
kandi X-RAY | Autoheal Summary
kandi X-RAY | Autoheal Summary
A simple script that auto restarts distribute service from power cut or service crash.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Autoheal
Autoheal Key Features
Autoheal Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Autoheal
QUESTION
I am looking forward a way to list the value from a nested variable (which has dict and list values) ie register
which is response_find
and I have that in mostly json format and most of the values inside the json are nested within []
list like construct.
It works somehow if I get individual values from it like below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-23 at 20:50If you want to do a dictionary out of those data you listed, you could use the filter json_query
, which is using JMESPath to parse and process JSON.
In order to extract a dictionary looking like:
QUESTION
I have had weird problems in kubernetes. When I run install command, pods never started. Pvc was bound. It gave errors below order
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-12 at 14:39I have used old cluster.yaml file and added 'allowUninstallWithVolumes: false' under cleanupPolicy. That solves everything.
QUESTION
I read carefully the Kubernetes Documentation here about extending the default 15% of imagefs.available
and the others parameters but it doesn't say how to set it, i have installed the RKE (Rancher Kubernetes Engine) with the following configs.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-04 at 00:23The kubelet has the following default hard eviction threshold: memory.available<100Mi nodefs.available<10% nodefs.inodesFree<5% imagefs.available<15%
As per official Rancher page:
You can add additional arguments/binds/environment variables via the Config File option in Cluster Options. For more information, see the Extra Args, Extra Binds, and Extra Environment Variables in the RKE documentation or browse the Example Cluster.ymls.
Look in the full example how you can configure kubelet options:
QUESTION
I have set up a Google Cloud Compute Engine VM instance group (with number of instances between 2 and 5) and have configured autohealing to start after 3 failed health checks. The instances are created using an instance template with a startup script deploying my application. However, when I attempt to test the autohealing by stopping my application process on one vm, the failing instance is eventually removed and replaced during autohealing, but 3 new instances are also created during the process. I have also configured the instance group's autohealing initial delay also to be 600 seconds, so I don't think that is the issue.
I have checked the instance group's logs for health check statements after enabling logging, and this is what I have discovered:
- After the first logged change in health check status, a remove instance operation is performed, followed by an add instance operation.
- After the add instance operation, another health check probe result is logged, with health state going from "UNKNOWN"/"UNHEALTHY" to "TIMEOUT"/"UNHEALTHY".
- Three more add instance operations are logged around 2 minutes afterwards, which are removed shortly afterwards after when scaling down.
Does anyone know why the 3 extra add instance operations are taking place and is it possible to avoid this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-09 at 17:15Update: The issue was resolved by increasing the cool down period of the autoscaling configuration.
QUESTION
I have configured a group on Google Cloud Monitoring to select gce_instances following a naming convention for a predefined instance group. However, I have noticed that it seems to include instances that have already been deleted for a brief time (ie. right after a replacement of the vms in the instance group). This is causing additional alerts to be sent for an uptime check that was created for the monitoring group because the uptime checks are still being performed for vms that are already deleted. Is there a way to configure criteria for the group to only consider vm instances that are actually running?
I have also set up autohealing for the instance group with the same triggering conditions as the uptime check which is being used in conjunction with the uptime check. Would it be possible to configure alerts on autohealing instead of using both in conjunction because of the aforementioned situation with uptime checks?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-08 at 21:17It seems you wanted to configure criteria for the monitoring group to only consider vm instances that are actually running, which is not available currently.
I have created a Feature request. Feel free to post there should you have any additional comments or concerns regarding the issue and also track for future updates.
QUESTION
I'm attempting to stand up a new RabbitMq server (Version 3.7.23, Erlang Version 22.2.3), and I've managed to get LDAP authentication working. Unfortunately, it seems that the authentication is quite slow, so my monitoring tools sporadically report errors when checking the aliveness endpoint and the UI occasionally shows a red "could not connect to server" error when navigating through the application that eventually goes away.
While researching my issue, it seems that the rabbit_auth_backend_cache
plugin should help with this. I implemented the cache but it does not seem to be working. The rabbit log still shows Rabbitmq attempting to connect to LDAP for each request and I'm not seeing any errors that would explain what's going on with the cache.
Here is my config:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-24 at 13:47After posting on some other forums, it looks like I just needed to up the TTL to 5 minutes instead of 5 seconds.
Thanks, Alex
QUESTION
I found this question..
You want to configure autohealing for network load balancing for a group of Compute Engine instances that run in multiple zones, using the fewest possible steps. You need to configure recreation of VMs if they are unresponsive after 3 attempts of 10 seconds each. What should you do?
A. Create an HTTP load balancer with a backend configuration that references an existing instance group. Set the health check to healthy(HTTP)
B. Create an HTTP load balancer with a backend configuration that references an existing instance group. Define a balancing mode and set the maximum RPS to 10.
C. Create a managed instance group. Set the Autohealing health check to healthy(HTTP)
D. Create a managed instance group. Verify that the auto scaling setting is on.
Which is the correct answer? I think is A
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-10 at 15:36To configure the recreation of VMs, you need Autohealing. So not B and D.
A: Load balancing health checks help direct traffic away from non-responsive instances and toward healthy instances; these health checks do not cause Compute Engine to recreate instances.
C: Application-based autohealing improves application availability by relying on a health checking signal that detects application-specific issues such as freezing, crashing, or overloading. If a health check determines that an application has failed on an instance, the group automatically recreates that instance.
So the answer is C.
QUESTION
I'm trying to bring up a RabbitMQ cluster on Kubernetes using Rabbitmq-peer-discovery-k8s plugin and I always have only on pod running and ready but the next one always fails.
I tried multiple changes to my configuration and this is what got at least one pod running
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-22 at 16:09finally i fixed it by adding this in /etc/resolv.conf of my pods:
QUESTION
I have set up a health check to autoheal my managed instance group. When the health check fails for a particular instance it takes a while to stop so that it can be recreated.
Is there any way to speed up the stop procedure so that my instances are recreated more quickly?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-05 at 16:35The only thing I can think of is something you probably did already: reduce the check interval and the timeout values. Other than that, this is the normal behavior of the GCE infrastructure. If there is anything you can optimize on your end, that would also reduce the time to recreate the VM.
QUESTION
I've got some automations for setting up a clustered service [Galera] that uses etcd for service location. I've then got a load balancer that reads this information in order to initialize and run.
The trouble is that while testing autohealing I noticed that there are empty etcd 'directories' where the old nodes used to be, aka lacking a nodes
subkey. This then causes trouble in the load balancer config.
Below is the result of curl http://etcd/... | jq .node.nodes[]
which illustrates the problem.
How do I filter out the sub-objects that do not have a nodes
key, eg: 172.17.0.16
?
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-18 at 16:08Your original doesn't do any filtering, add it:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Autoheal
You can use Autoheal like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page