security-advisories | published security advisories reported by the Programa STIC | Database library
kandi X-RAY | security-advisories Summary
kandi X-RAY | security-advisories Summary
A database of published security advisories reported by the Programa STIC Team at Fundación Sadosky
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- handle GET request
- Run an etter .
- Obtain Twitter token
- Obtain a key from Facebook .
- Sends a modified search
- Obtain Facebook token
- Sends a JS script to the given URL .
- Post on Facebook .
- Replaces all occurrences in a file .
- Post on twitter .
security-advisories Key Features
security-advisories Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on security-advisories
QUESTION
I have downgraded a Symfony 5.2 app template to use Symfony 4.4 in order to allow the use of some libraries that require an older version of Symfony. The problem is that when I do composer install
, I get this error near the end of the installation:
sh: symfony-cmd: command not found
It seems that the installations are mostly successful, as my vendor
folder is created and populated. But I'm worried about the error.
What does this error mean? How do I fix it?
====
Edit: Here's my composer.json
file:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-29 at 15:16symfony-cmd
is a part of Symfony Flex. Your composer.json
does not contain any requirement for Flex, so running composer require symfony/flex
might resolve that problem.
QUESTION
I'm trying to update my Symfony 4.4.19 to Symfony 5.x but i've got two conflicts who are blocking the process: symfony/monolog-bundle and roave/security-advisories
I'm running method composer update "symfony/*" --with-all-dependencies
In Symfony documentation about upgrading, it is clearly specified that "A few libraries starting with symfony/ follow their own versioning scheme. You do not need to update these versions: you can upgrade them independently whenever you want" and the example is...symfony/monolog-bundle
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-03 at 21:22The problem is not really in monolog-bundle but as follows:
- monolog-bundle requires symfony/http-kernel ~3.4 || ~4.0 || ^5.0
- You restricted all Symfony components to 5.0 (by setting "extra" -> "symfony" -> "require" to 5.0.*). So the only fulfillable requirement for monolog-bundle is http-kernel 5.0.*
- roave/security-advisories works by purposely conflicting with lib versions that have known security issues. In this case, every 5.0.* release has vulnerability CVE-2020-15094 (see https://symfony.com/blog/cve-2020-15094-prevent-rce-when-calling-untrusted-remote-with-cachinghttpclient) and is therefore blocked. So there is no valid version left and Composer aborts.
My suggestion: Symfony 5.0 reached end of life, so use the current release Symfony 5.2.x (Composer constraint "^5.2"). As Symfony uses strict Semantic Versioning there is no disadvantage for going to 5.2 instead of 5.0 (i.e. all code that runs on 5.0 will also run on 5.2).
QUESTION
I'm trying to update my Laravel version from 6 -> 8 by following this guide https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/upgrade
I'm not sure if I should update to Laravel 7 first, then to 8, never the less, I face the same composer problem when trying to update to 7.
composer update output:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-08 at 12:38At least one of the packages you're using doesn't support Laravel 7 or 8. The composer error message tells you which one.
According to the error message, "silber/bouncer": "v1.0.0-rc.6"
only supports up to Laravel 6. Looking at the composer.json for that package shows that support for Laravel 7 wasn't added until v1.0.0-rc.7
, and support for Laravel 8 wasn't added until v1.0.0-rc.9
.
You'll need to update your silber/bouncer
dependency and then try again. If you run into another error, you'll need to look at the message to determine which package doesn't meet the requirements, and then figure out what version of that package you need to get to in order to meet the requirements.
Since Laravel 8 is fairly new, you may run into some packages that haven't been updated to support it yet (such as vimeo/laravel
). In that case, you'll either need to wait until those packages support it, or fork the package and attempt to add the support yourself.
QUESTION
I've just come across the https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories tool which looks a great way to automatically scan for the vulnerabilities that are in that community-contributed database.
It scans a composer.lock
file for packages with vulnerabilities. However, it's made me realise that my understanding of Composer is not what it should be!
I have a project that has a composer.json
file that require
s a single demo/package
. That demo package also has requirements, like demo/dep
.
The result of running composer install --no-dev
is that I have a composer.lock
file which includes:
demo/package
version1.0
demo/dep
version1.2
All good so far, and running symfony security:check /path/to/my/project/composer.lock
gives me a green light, no vulnerabilities.
However on close inspection of the files now in my vendor
dir, I can see there's a vendor/demo/package/composer.lock
file, which contains references to demo/dep
at version 1.1
- which has a security vulnerability against it.
As I understand, I have the safer 1.2
version installed - so says my project's composer.lock
file, but why is a composer.lock
file included with the vendor's package?
Does that mean that the dodgy code is installed somewhere, too? Or can I just simply ignore the composer.lock
files if there's a composer.lock
file in a dir above it or such? composer show
does not list the versions in the nested lock file. Or maybe I should ignore composer.lock files if there's no sibling ./vendor/
dir?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-05 at 06:12Why not simply inspect your folders to find a vulnerable version? If there was any, you should find a vendor
folder within that package, that's where that package could have installed stuff from it's own composer.lock
Usually, only the composer.json
of a package is evaluated to install dependencies. If there is a lock file within one package's folder, you should ask the maintainer of that package why this is the case, but for installing dependencies on your system, this does not matter.
Side note: writing "usually" refers to the standard model of installations. I've seen some crude stuff where Composer plugins put other rules in place, but this cannot be said for your project without knowing more about the structure.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install security-advisories
You can use security-advisories like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page