warden | WARden | Private Portfolio Tool | Portfolio library
kandi X-RAY | warden Summary
kandi X-RAY | warden Summary
WARden | Private Portfolio Tool
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of warden
warden Key Features
warden Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on warden
QUESTION
using ruby 2.6.5, Rails 6.0.3.7
There is before_action filter which are working fine when running the project in the development server. But while running the integration tests of the rails application. The call back do not execute and the request goes directly to the called function rather than going to the before action first.
Here attaching my controller and integration test case and error output. Controller
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 15:33It's because you don't have a file
parameter.
So your check_file
is using this part:
QUESTION
Im running ruby version 2.6.1 with docker. Rake gem is version 13.0.1.
Whenever I tried docker-compose up, it always fails and throws this error everytime:
This error did not exist before.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-23 at 12:27I'm not really sure what happened and why but I tried doing this on my rails container and I was no longer receiving the said error.
docker-compose run --rm bash
cd to project directory
bundle install
QUESTION
I have a Rails 6.1 app using devise 4.7.1, doorkeeper 5.5.1, and devise-doorkeeper 1.2.0.
I'm trying to run through a (PKCE) OAuth flow, but the final step -- a POST request to /oauth/token
-- returns a 401 Unauthorized error with the JSON content {"error": "You need to sign in or sign up before continuing."}
.
I'm confused about this, since the /oauth/token
endpoint should be accessible to unauthenticated users as far as I understand. What's also weird (but perhaps a red herring) is that if I attempt to run the same POST request with curl, but remove the User-Agent header, it succeeds.
My current suspect is this block of code in initializers/doorkeeper.rb
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-05 at 19:47This problem was caused by our use of the Ahoy analytics library.
By default, this library tracks all page visits in your Rails app. It tries to get the current user using current_user || current_resource_owner
. Because current_user
was still nil when POSTing to /oauth/token
, getting current_resource_owner
ended up calling our Doorkeeper resource_owner_authenticator
, which returned the 401 error. The source code for this is here.
This also explains why things worked as expected when unsetting the User-Agent
header: with no user agent (or the user agent of e.g. curl), Ahoy treats the request as coming from a bot, and doesn't attempt to track it (source code here).
Our solution to this is to tell Ahoy to stop tracking all page views automatically by setting Ahoy.api_only = true
in its configuration.
QUESTION
the Ruby on Rails Security Guide on Security, under 2.9 Session Expiry
gives following example code:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-02 at 10:16Those instructions are really useful if you’re building your own auth system, but Devise can handle this for you.
In your user model, add the :timeoutable
attribute to your existing devise
statement.
In config/initializers/devise.rb
, you can then specify the timeout duration, e.g.:
QUESTION
I have cloned an existing project and trying to run it in my system. Since this is the first time I don't have any Gemfile.lock file in my directory. I tried running bundle install and the following errors occur:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 18:06In your project directory, try installing rails gem install rails -v 4.1.6
and removing the version from the failing gems like (liquid_markdown
, gon
, etc..) then try running bundle update
then bundle clean --force
I think this might be an issue because all the version of these gems are locked inside your Gemfile
QUESTION
I'm trying to upgrade my Ruby on Rails application to Ruby 3.0.1. I'm getting an error when the server is starting on Render.com. I'm also getting the same error when running specs on my local machine
error on render.com ...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 19:49So... It seems this line in ActiveSupport v6.0.3.6
is calling this method in redis with 3 arguments instead of 2; exactly like the error says!
And just as I suspected, that's already been fixed in the master branch. Here was the commit that introduced the fix.
So in other words, I reckon you've found a bug in rails 6.0 working with ruby 3.0.
Additionally, it seems that this bug has already been backported into the 6.0-stable
branch and, according to the comments, "will be included in Rails 6.0.4
".
tl;dr: Either downgrade ruby back to 2.7
, or upgrade rails to 6.1
, or add to your Gemfile
:
QUESTION
I recently tried to update devise to the latest version specified in the gemfile without affecting its dependencies.
gemfile.lock:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 19:36There is an open issue about that on github.
QUESTION
I am using ros-apartment gem
for multi tenancy in rails application. I have deployed the application on AWS and sometime I get below error:
Apartment::TenantNotFound (Error while connecting to tenant 34: FATAL: database "34" does not exist):
And the backtrack of this error is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-02 at 13:56I am facing this issue because my host IP start from 34.xx.xx.xx
as per code it return first subdomain it consider 34 is a first subdomain and because of that it search for 34 database and issue occcured
QUESTION
I'm helping a friend with a project, but after helping him with the logic instead of merging my branch, for some reason he copied the code and added it himself. So my branch remained "behind". He kept working and now he asked me to help him with something else, but I had a bunch of conflicts to resolve before working on the new logic, I tried to resolve the conflicts manually but something must have slipped my check, because now I have a bunch of conflicts in the Gemfile.lock that I don't know how to fix. Can you guys give it a check? Thank you so much!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-04 at 16:57Gemfile.lock is a file generated from Gemfile. As such, instead of trying to merge the two branches, it's simpler and more accurate to generate a new one from its canonical source. This might result in slightly different versions, but these should cause no trouble; any version restrictions should be defined in your Gemfile.
Normally one does not commit generated files, they can change in trivial ways, but Gemfile.lock is a special case where you do want this to be the same for all builds.
Resolve any conflicts in the Gemfile. Regenerate Gemfile.lock. Add it.
for some reason he copied the code and added it himself
This is a good opportunity to explain to them why this is a bad practice when working with a team. It might be easy for them, but it's causing trouble for you. They might need instructing in how to update their work in progress. Or you might need to extract some changes into their own branch and get that merged.
QUESTION
I am naive in ROR. I am trying to login user with only email, using devise. I want to render login page if user with email provided does not exist. But, when I try to render 'new', after checking that user does not exist in database. While doing so I get error - "First argument in form cannot contain nil or be empty". Please help me out on this. Thanks in advance !!!
rails/app/controllers/users/sessions_controller.rb
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-22 at 08:19The new
view display a form for the current resource
, which should be initialized in the action new
.
Your best bet at this point, is to replace render 'new'
by calling new
itself, which should take care of your problem.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install warden
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page