Software | RepRapPro Software to run our 3D printers | Frontend Framework library

I was able to get it resolved, but the solution is...hacky.

So, apparently, Google Apps Script exports only what is in globalThis of a project: just the functions and variables. No classes, no constants, ...

Probably has a lot to do with how ES6 works, with its globalThis behavior. One can see that in action, by creating a dummy function, a dummy variable, and a dummy class in their local developer console:

The ASHWID provides a strong binding between the app/packag, which is not affected by OS re-installs and version updates for an app. But sometimes there are also other reasons can affect it, it is difficult to know which causes the change of the ASHWID.

Therefore, if you want to get the unique id to distinguish the device, maybe you could use SystemIdentification.GetSystemIdForPublisher method, the identifier returned by this method is specific to the app publisher on the current device. In other words, all apps by the same publisher will get the same value for this ID (for all users).

First, make sure that https://github.com/mycomp/repo-pr does exist (meaning the case, uper or lower, of the URL is correct)

Second, check that you are correctly authenticated by GitHub through SSH:

Unfortunately doing this directly by attempting to web scrape the search results using UrlFetchApp will not work. You can use third party tools to get the number of search results, however.

I tested this out using an exponential backoff method which sometimes is able to get past 429 errors when a fetch request is invoked by UrlFetchApp.

When using UrlFetchApp to either web scrape or to connect to an API, it can happen that the server denies the request on the grounds of too many requests - or HTTP Error 429.

Google Apps Script runs in the cloud, from a set of IP addresses in a pool that Google own. You can actually see all the IP ranges here. Most websites (especially large companies such as Google) have architecture in place to prevent the use of bots scraping their websites and slowing down traffic.

Sometimes it's possible to get past this error, using a mixture of exponential backoff and random time intervals as shown for the Binance API (Full Disclosure: this GitHub repository was written by me.)

I assume that either Google directly blocks the Apps Script IP pool, or there are simply too many people trying the same thing - because with the same techniques I was unable to get any response that didn't involve entering a captcha as we discussed in the comments above and can be seen in the log of the page string.

There are many third party APIs that you can use to do this, and I suggest searching for one that meets your needs.

I tested out one called Authoritas which returns search engine indexing for different keywords. The API is asynchornous, so can take up to a minute to get a response, so a Web App solution needs to be made.

The flow I used is as follows:

• Obtain API key from Authoritas (free)
• Create a new Apps Script project to make an API call:

This is an error in Arelle, which shows up for Python 3.6 and later. There is a pull request for it , but that is still open (since July 2017). Given that Python 3.6 has been out for quite a while, I don't know why this hasn't been fixed.

You are using the lxml branch, which has been stale for 10 years. So perhaps this error has actually been fixed (even if the pull request is still open) on the master brach, but not on the lxml branch. Try installing from master first, if that is an option for you.

Basic Authentication works a little differently with the requests library. You can do something like this instead:

If you want to use it, there is a plugin for just that.

jQuery.matchHeight

Honestly, after days of research, I'm trying to talk the team into the idea of creating an API dedicated to Docs, and as part of that effort would migrate documents to AWS S3 or azure blob storage. We will introduce Aspose for rendering and separate the Issue.

Why? because all the solutions I have seen to support doc and Docx in .net5 are really hacky and I can see lacks in terms of security. And I would not recommend anyone to try to do the approach I was looking to do at the begging of this question.

I leave here what experience cause this research was pain and I hope this question can still help someone.

All the answers you're looking for are in the users guide (and manpage)

Firstly, assuming you don't want to scan the input files to add included files specified in the input files, you can use Commmand() (See info here: https://scons.org/doc/production/HTML/scons-user.html#chap-builders-commands)

Then you'll want an alias to specify an a non file command line target (See here:https://scons.org/doc/production/HTML/scons-user.html#chap-alias)

Putting those two together yields