SubScribe | video files to images | Machine Learning library

If you have the following when you log in to Revue

"We are reviewing your account."

You will not be able to make API calls and will get a 401.

I've talked to support on the issue and unfortunately, it's undocumented at the moment.

Took nearly a week for me to get reviewed but it's working fine now. It is at the end of the Christmas period so I am hoping they are only temporarily that slow at reviewing accounts.

this looks like a simplified version of what the reactor-pool does, in essence. have you considered using that with eg. a maximum size of 1?

https://github.com/reactor/reactor-pool/

https://projectreactor.io/docs/pool/0.2.7/api/reactor/pool/Pool.html

The pool is probably overkill, because it has the overhead of having to deal with multiple resources on top of multiple competing borrowers like in your case, but maybe it could provide some inspiration for you to go further.

You could try following approach. I did not test it now and have written it off the top of my head but it is based on an approach I used in one project.

Basically you would still use a Guard for this but load the permissions from your service dynamically and based on them either let the user activate the page or redirect to the Unauthorized page. CanActivate subscribes to the Observable for you so you don't have to manage any subscription manually.

I think there is some issue with the security rules built. You can refer to the Firestore security rules to learn more about writing rules and for testing your rules you can refer documentation where mentioned :

Cloud Firestore provides a rules simulator that you can use to test your ruleset. You can access the simulator from the Rules tab in the Cloud Firestore section of the Firebase console. The rules simulator lets you simulate authenticated and unauthenticated reads, writes, and deletes.

a) From the screenshot of the Firestore database products collection, the document ID appears to be an auto-generated alphanumeric sequence. So below match rules are going to match document ID (auto-generated) in {userEmail} & {userId} variables instead of the user email or user ID as the variable name suggests.

The value in an enum class are always of the type of the enum. Though you can also add fields and methods to your enum class:

1. It sounds strange, but the fix is adding work manager dependency 2.7.0+ : implementation "androidx.work:work-runtime:2.7.0"

2. You have to update dependencies that should support Android 12 braking changes (I had to update some third parties). Check that on github and documentation pages

3. Also, some libraries are using permission that is required for Android 12. Please check the documentation for this permission

4. Also, check google's issue tracker for google's library-specific issues related to Android 12

Maybe I missed something, but all this helped me to migrate. Good luck :)

The seekToEnd method requires the information on the actual partition (in Kafka terms TopicPartition) on which you plan to make your consumer read from the end.

I am not familiar with the Kotlin API, but checking the JavaDocs on the KafkaConsumer's method seekToEnd you will see, that it asks for a collection of TopicPartitions.

As you are currently using emptyList(), it will have no impact at all, just like you observed.

To get the expiration time of a single domain, you can use the RSKOwner contract with the expirationTime method. You can query this contract to with the domain you are interested in.

On Mainnet, the contract’s address is 0x45d3E4fB311982a06ba52359d44cB4f5980e0ef1, which can be verified on the RSK explorer. The ABI for this contract can be found here.

Using Web3 library, you can query a single domain (such as testing.rsk) like this:

std::memcpy(arr_copy, arr, sizeof arr); (your example) is well-defined.

std::memcpy(arr_copy, arr[0], sizeof arr);, on the other hand, causes undefined behavior (at least in C++; not entirely sure about C).

Multidimensional arrays are 1D arrays of arrays. As far as I know, they don't get much (if any) special treatment compared to true 1D arrays (i.e. arrays with elements of non-array type).

Consider an example with a 1D array: