django-annoying | django application that tries to eliminate annoying things
kandi X-RAY | django-annoying Summary
kandi X-RAY | django-annoying Summary
This django application eliminates certain annoyances in the Django framework.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Get the object or return the object
- Fetch object from queryset
- Convert database value to python value
- Deserialize value into Python object
django-annoying Key Features
django-annoying Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on django-annoying
QUESTION
I have a project using Django 2.2.4.
I have a Django model called Company.
I use a post_save signal to make sure that as soon as a new Company is created, a new model instance called "Billing" is created, which is associated with that Company. This contains the company's billing information. This works great.
Since my Billing object is associated with a Company, and I use on_delete=models.CASCADE
, as soon as the Company is deleted, the Billing object associated with that company is automatically deleted as well. This works great too.
Since the Billing object for each company is now automatically created and deleted along with the Company, there's no need for admins using the Django Admin web interface to ever have to manually create, or delete Billing objects. I want to hide this functionality from them.
Normally, the common way to prevent Django Admin from allowing someone to add or delete an object is by adding this to that model's ModelAdmin in admin.py:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-26 at 19:03After a little digging, it does appear that the ModelAdmin
will simply call delete()
on the object, meaning that it shouldn't look at your billing permissions for admin specifically. Looking at the model delete also confirms that it does not care what the admin permissions are.
I got curious, and wondered if maybe the has_delete_permission
function looks at related objects. That also didn't appear to be the case. At this point, I'm curious if you have overridden your Billing
model's delete
function? That would prevent deletion, and if you have CASCADE
set as your on_delete
for the relation, it would not allow you to finish deleting the Company
at that point because it was unable to cascade delete.
If you have a stack trace or explicit error message, please share it.
With that said, I don't know if I agree with the approach to this. I think it would make more sense to enforce this at the model level of Billing
. When attempting a delete
, you could check if there are no other Billing
objects for the Company
, and if so, raise a validation error notifying the user that a Company
must have at least one Billing
. I don't know your models since they aren't posted, so if it's a one-to-one relation, please ignore this. Here's a rough idea of how I would expect it to look otherwise:
QUESTION
Say you have a rather large requirements.pip
when you modify a requirements.pip, it takes ages to build Docker image because it has to download and install all packages in requirements.pip
Is there a way to speed up the docker image building process when you modify a length requirements.pip
?
MY docker
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-31 at 15:05You can divide by yourself in different files the requirements that are less likely to change and those that are most likely to change.
Then you have two different RUN
stages like
QUESTION
I'm trying to serve a Django 2.1 with Python 3.7 application with React 16.6 frontend to AWS Elastic Beanstalk. I build the React app using Create React App.
So far I succesfully got the server running (I serve React's index.html
via a TemplateView) and connected with the database. I'm now kinda stuck connecting the S3 bucket to my template view.
Here is the issue:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-12 at 20:13Your browser is trying fetch your stylesheets and javascript files from a relative path because you specified one in your index.html
:
QUESTION
- My project has 2 or more different kind of models as post
- And i want to bookmark for all kind of post models
- I need dashboard or timeline that shows bookmarked posts whatever the kind of that post
So i thought 2 plans.
First Plan :
Making different bookmark model at every post
Like :
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-31 at 14:59How about this: define a type of post so you can have many more types of post in the future, and a UserBookmark
so a user can have as many bookmarks he wants:
QUESTION
I'm using Python and I'm trying to scrape this website: https://online.ratb.ro/info/browsers.aspx
But I'm getting this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\pinguluk\Desktop\Proiecte GIT\RATB Scraper\test2.py", line 3, in
test = requests.get('https://online.ratb.ro/info/browsers.aspx')
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\requests\api.py", line 72, in get
return request('get', url, params=params, **kwargs)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\requests\api.py", line 58, in request
return session.request(method=method, url=url, **kwargs)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\requests\sessions.py", line 518, in request
resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\requests\sessions.py", line 639, in send
r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\requests\adapters.py", line 512, in send
raise SSLError(e, request=request)
requests.exceptions.SSLError: ("bad handshake: SysCallError(-1, 'Unexpected EOF')",)
Installed modules:
['appdirs==1.4.3', 'asn1crypto==0.22.0', 'attrs==16.3.0', 'automat==0.5.0', 'beautifulsoup4==4.5.3', 'cairocffi==0.8.0', 'certifi==2017.4.17', 'cffi==1.10.0', 'colorama==0.3.9', 'constantly==15.1.0', 'cryptography==1.8.1', 'cssselect==1.0.1', 'cycler==0.10.0', 'distributedlock==1.2', 'django-annoying==0.10.3', 'django-oauth-tokens==0.6.3', 'django-taggit==0.22.1', 'django==1.11.1', 'enum34==1.1.6', 'facepy==1.0.8', 'functools32==3.2.3.post2', 'futures==3.1.1', 'gevent==1.2.1', 'greenlet==0.4.12', 'grequests==0.3.0', 'html5lib==0.999999999', 'htmlparser==0.0.2', 'httplib2==0.10.3', 'idna==2.5', 'incremental==16.10.1', 'ipaddress==1.0.18', 'lazyme==0.0.10', 'lxml==3.7.3', 'matplotlib==2.0.2', 'mechanize==0.3.3', 'ndg-httpsclient==0.4.2', 'numpy==1.12.1', 'oauthlib==2.0.2', 'olefile==0.44', 'opencv-python==3.2.0.7', 'packaging==16.8', 'parsel==1.1.0', 'pillow==4.0.0', 'pip==9.0.1', 'py2exe==0.6.9', 'pyandoc==0.0.1', 'pyasn1-modules==0.0.8', 'pyasn1==0.2.3', 'pycairo-gtk==1.10.0', 'pycparser==2.17', 'pygtk==2.22.0', 'pyhook==1.5.1', 'pynput==1.3.2', 'pyopenssl==17.0.0', 'pyparsing==2.2.0', 'pypiwin32==219', 'pyquery==1.2.17', 'python-dateutil==2.6.0', 'python-memcached==1.58', 'pytz==2017.2', 'pywin32==221', 'queuelib==1.4.2', 'requests-futures==0.9.7', 'requests-oauthlib==0.8.0', 'requests-toolbelt==0.8.0', 'requests==2.14.2', 'restclient==0.11.0', 'robobrowser==0.5.3', 'selenium==3.4.1', 'service-identity==16.0.0', 'setuptools==35.0.2', 'simplejson==3.10.0', 'six==1.10.0', 'twitter==1.17.0', 'twitterfollowbot==2.0.2', 'urllib3==1.21.1', 'w3lib==1.17.0', 'webencodings==0.5.1', 'werkzeug==0.12.1', 'wheel==0.29.0', 'zope.interface==4.3.3']
Thanks.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-25 at 02:16I think you will have hard time solving this problem since the server you are trying to "scrape" is awfully configured (ssllabs.com gave it a grade F) and it might be that Requests don't even support any of cipher suites because they are all insecure. There might be an option of creating a custom HTTPAdapter
, so you might try that out.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install django-annoying
You can also run python setup.py install, easy_install django-annoying, or pip install django-annoying.
Add "annoying" under INSTALLED_APPS in your settings.py file.
Django-annoying requires Django 1.11 or later.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page