AttackSurfaceMapper | AttackSurfaceMapper is a tool that aims to automate | Security Testing library

by superhedgy Python Version: v1.1 License: GPL-3.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | AttackSurfaceMapper Summary

AttackSurfaceMapper is a Python library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. AttackSurfaceMapper has build file available, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has medium support. However AttackSurfaceMapper has 3 bugs and it has 3 vulnerabilities. You can download it from GitHub.

AttackSurfaceMapper (ASM) is a reconnaissance tool that uses a mixture of open source intelligence and active techniques to expand the attack surface of your target. You feed in a mixture of one or more domains, subdomains and IP addresses and it uses numerous techniques to find more targets. It enumerates subdomains with bruteforcing and passive lookups, Other IPs of the same network block owner, IPs that have multiple domain names pointing to them and so on. Once the target list is fully expanded it performs passive reconnaissance on them, taking screenshots of websites, generating visual maps, looking up credentials in public breaches, passive port scanning with Shodan/Censys and scraping employees from LinkedIn.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

AttackSurfaceMapper has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 1172 star(s) with 185 fork(s). There are 46 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 4 open issues and 25 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 59 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of AttackSurfaceMapper is v1.1

Quality

AttackSurfaceMapper has 3 bugs (1 blocker, 0 critical, 2 major, 0 minor) and 138 code smells.

Security

AttackSurfaceMapper has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

AttackSurfaceMapper code analysis shows 3 unresolved vulnerabilities (0 blocker, 3 critical, 0 major, 0 minor).

There are 9 security hotspots that need review.

License

AttackSurfaceMapper is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

AttackSurfaceMapper releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Build file is available. You can build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

AttackSurfaceMapper saves you 897 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 2050 lines of code, 80 functions and 15 files.

It has high code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed AttackSurfaceMapper and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into AttackSurfaceMapper implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Store results
Search for ASNs based on hostx
Print a message
Load keychain
Query IP addresses
Start the lookup loop
Check if a host is available
Return a resolver
Checks if the result is successful
Print the given arguments to stderr
Print the results of a target
Run a set of nameservers
Perform a DNS query
Get the nameservers of the given hostname
Try to open an input file
Adds a target domain to the list
Finds all active IPs
Query VirusTotal API
Print the results to stdout
Take a screenshot
Add a target IP address to the list
Add a new Target object to the list
Try to open a file
Start the AMM server
Run the main loop
Show the banner
Performs the permutation
Signal handler
Print arguments to stderr

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

AttackSurfaceMapper Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for AttackSurfaceMapper.

AttackSurfaceMapper Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for AttackSurfaceMapper.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Security Testing

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

QUESTION

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install AttackSurfaceMapper

As this is a Python based tool, it should theoretically run on Linux, ChromeOS (Developer Mode), macOS and Windows.
Download AttackSurfaceMapper
Install Python dependencies
Add optional API keys to enhance data gathering & analysis
VirusTotal
Shodan.io
Hunter.io
~~WeLeakInfo~~
LinkedIn
GrayHatWarfare
Censys.io

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: