break | Like Boom , but based on Molotov

The problem is that your is_prime function is to slow, instead of checking if every number is a prime inside of your for loop. Why not generate a list of primes, lets say the first 1 million, store them in a list. Then too check if your number is prime, just check if it is inside of the list.

select() can set a timeout for the connection part.

Yes, but only if you put the socket into non-blocking mode before calling connect(), so that connect() exits immediately and then the code can use select() to wait for the socket to report when the connect operation has finished. But the code shown is not doing that.

setsockopt() with timeval can timeout the receiving portion of the code

Yes, though select() can also be used to timeout a read operation, as well. Simply call select() first, and then call recv() only if select() reports that the socket is readable (has pending data to read).

Try something like this:

Here's a solution:

evaluate with ? Process!Function+0x66

copy the result for using in breakpoint 0x12345678`90abcdef

I'm trying to parallelize a merge-sort algorithm. What I'm doing is dividing the input array for each thread, then merging the threads results.

Ok, but yours is an unnecessarily difficult approach. At each step of the merge process, you want half of your threads to wait for the other half to finish, and the most natural way for one thread to wait for another to finish is to use pthread_join(). If you wanted all of your threads to continue with more work after synchronizing then that would be different, but in this case, those that are not responsible for any more merges have nothing at all left to do.

This is what I've tried:

I received an official response for the reCAPTCHA Enterprise support team:

Thanks for reaching out here. We recommend not putting a checkbox behind a score. More details are available on this here: https://cloud.google.com/recaptcha-enterprise/docs/faq#id_like_to_use_the_score_from_to_show_a_challenge_checkbox_widget_how_can_i_do_this

Not only are there concerns listed in that FAQ point about the efficacy of a checkbox widget when placed behind a score, but it also over simplifies how the checkbox widget works. We perform "adversarial challenging" on our checkbox widget (essentially, we show harder challenges to known attackers), but we're unable to do so when placed behind a score reCAPTCHA.

All of this being said, if you do wish to do it anyway, you would have to include the JS file twice.

And this is from the link posted in their email:

I'd like to use the score from reCAPTCHA Enterprise to show a challenge / checkbox widget. How can I do this?

We recommend that you do not do this. reCAPTCHA Enterprise expects to see both good and bad user behavior on implementation. If you trigger a reCAPTCHA Enterprise checkbox widget based on a reCAPTCHA Enterprise score, the checkbox widget is only being exposed to bad traffic. Due to this, the widget can have a more difficult time determining whether to show a challenge or not. This can result in issuing NO CAPTCHAs (no challenge shown at all) to fraudulent users or bots due to trouble making that differentiation.

In these cases, we recommend just using a challenge-based site key upfront (like reCAPTCHA Enterprise with a CHECKBOX Site Key) instead, but installing a SCORE Site Key on every page, as well as issuing grecaptcha.enterprise.execute to train the model, but foregoing assessments on the SCORE tokens. Essentially, this achieves the goal by training the reCAPTCHA Enterprise CHECKBOX site keys on user behavior, resulting in less challenges shown to legitimate users and more challenges to fraudulent ones.

You don't actually need javascript. A simple link will do. You can also do it with javascript, but I see no reason to in this case.

This would work:

Fix composer.json

I have created an issue on the PHP package: https://github.com/pusher/pusher-http-php/issues/295

It is true this version is broken, but the fix should be in the composer.json file. Mine looked like this:

• c, which is used in c != '\n', is not initialized at first. Its initial value is indeterminate and using is value without initializng invokes undefined behavior.
• You are checking line[i] != '\0', but you never assigned '\0' to line unless '\0' is read from the stream.
• You should initialize i before the second loop and update i during the second loop.
• Return values of getchar() should be assigned to int to distinguish between EOF and an valid character.
• You should perform index check not to cause buffer overrun.

Fixed code: