testtools | Testtools - tasteful testing for python

You're making an assumption based on wrong premises.

First of all, you're just creating a widget (the QGraphicsView) with a parent. Doing this will only make the widget a child of that parent, but without any size constraints: the widget is just "floating" inside its parent, so it will have a default size that usually is 100x30 for new child widgets (and 640x480 for widgets without parent set in the constructor)).

If you want to adjust the child to the parent it must be added to a layout. QMainWindow has its own (private) layout manager that uses a central widget to show the "main" content of the window, so if that QGraphicsView is going to be the only widget, you can just set that using main_window.setCentralWidget(canvas).

Then, a widget doesn't usually receive a resizeEvent until it's mapped the first time, unless it's manually resized. When it's shown the first time, any non previously layed out item receives the resize event. Since you're not showing the main window, no resize event is emitted, but even in that case, you resized the window before adding the child, so you would still see the same default size.

In order to ensure that the layout is properly computed even without showing the widget in which it is set, activate() must be explicitly called.

So, summing it up:

• widgets must be added to a layout in order to adapt their size to their parent;
• whenever a QMainWindow is used, setCentralWidget() must be used on the "main widget";
• manual resizing should be done after adding children to the layout in order to ensure that their geometries adapt to the parent (if you do the opposite, some size policies could result in the parent resizing itself based on the children);
• if the widget is not going to be shown, the layout must be manually activated;

It took me a day or two to figure out what was happening, because the debugger did not let me see anything. I wrote a console application:

After struggling with Apache Atlas for a while, I found 3.0.0 Snapshot version very buggy! Therefore I have decided to build and install Apache Atlas 2.1.0 RC3.

Prerequisite:

Make sure you have installed java on your machine. In case it is not installed on your computer, you can install it using the following command in Linux:

sudo apt-get install openjdk-8-jre

Then JAVA_HOME should be set:

Add [JsonIgnore] top of property.

To put it simply, you end up with a different mock instance for the Int2 property, after you set the return value for the Prop1 property. To fulfill your request Moq will generate a new mock, that will return the expected value for Prop1.

You can look at it as being equivalent to the following test:

As of this time, however, it is not supported to display description attribute on the Tests page.

As an alternative , you can use the REST API Attachments - Create Test Result Attachment to attach a file which contains description attribute to your test result. Then you can see it in "Attachment" in test result page.

The difficulty you're experiencing is caused mostly because one giant function is basically untestable.

So, you need to split your code. What follows is a list of the things you should consider:

• instead of a giant static function, you could create a class GameSense with a Run method. In your main you would do new GameSense.Run(). In the constructor of the class you would put the initialization, and the state of the game (AFAICT, the various variables declared on top of GameSense).
• you should split the body of GameSense by purpose: ReadInput(), UpdatePosition(movement), DrawBerry, CheckGameOver, etc

You should limit the usage non-testing friendly things to only the body of the Run method or in the ReadInput method. Then your tests should proceed like this:

Test with your csproj file and install any nuget packages, I did not get any build errors.

These are the nuget packages which I have installed.

Microsoft.Data.SqlClient

Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs

Microsoft.Data.Tools.UnitTest

So please make sure that there is no red error lines on your code editor.

Then, close VS, delete .vs hidden folder under the solution folder, bin and obj folder.

After that, restart VS and your project, then, run update-package -reinstall command under Tools-->Nuget Package Manager-->Package Manager Console

I think you have created a MSTest test project(net core) project rather than a unit test project(net framework) project.

In my side, I used unit test project(net framework), and all work well.

Actually, some of your nuget packages are for net framework. That is what the warning NU1701 did. But you can ignore that warning since it is normal that you have install the package into net core rather than net framework. And the package can be used under net core. And it is just a little warning rather than a error.

Due to that, update-package -reinstall cannot work for new-sdk project(your situaiton) and only for packages.config with net framework.

Maybe try these:

1)Besides, I think Microsoft.Data.Tools.Components.dll is from C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Community\Common7\IDE\Extensions\Microsoft\SQLDB. You have used some dlls from there. And due to some situations, these do not work and you should readd them on your current environment.

And first, please delete any references from here:

Then, readd these dlls from C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Community\Common7\IDE\Extensions\Microsoft\SQLDB to check if your project still have these errors.

Or you could remove Microsoft.Data.Tools.Components.dll from there to fix it.

If these do not help, maybe try nuget packages like what I said above:

1) clean all nuget caches first or just delete all files under C:\Users\xxx\.nuget\packages

2) to remove that warning, please add this xml node under csproj file of the unit test project.

3) Or you could try to use unit test project(net framework) project and then add your code there and I ensure that could work.

Is that the expected behavior

Looks like that behavior might be a bug. I would suggest raising an issue with the developer.

and is there any way to have Verify use the value of the list at the time that my method was called?

Make the setup Verifiable