specification | The Update Framework specification

Short answer: It's undefined behavior.

Most OpenAPI serialization styles are based on RFC 6570, which provides guidance only for:

• primitive values,
• arrays of primitives,
• simple non-nested objects (with primitive properties).

In case of other types of values (nested objects, objects containing arrays, nested arrays, arrays of objects) the behavior is undefined.

Similarly, OpenAPI's own deepObject style is currently defined only for simple objects but not for arrays or nested objects. Here are some related comments from the OpenAPI Specification authors/maintainers:

By the way, is there a reason we couldn't have deepObject work for arrays too? [...]

Darrel: Supporting arrays as you describe was my intent. I was supposed to find some canonical implementation to use as a guideline for the behavior, but didn't get around to it.

Ron: If we end up supporting the exploded array notation, it needs to be clear that the first index is 0 (or 1, or -1, or whatever).

(source)

Ron: when we defined deepObject in the spec, we explicitly chose to not mention what happens when the object has several levels in it, but in our conversations we went with 'not supported'. ​

(source)

There's an existing feature request to extend deepObject to support arrays and nested structures:
Support deep objects for query parameters with deepObject style

You could split the string on /, then map through the outcome array and check if the item starts with :, if it does, return the item (without :) between brackets, otherwise return the item. Then join the array back together with a /.

Like you noticed already, you can only check interactions on a mocked object type, i.e. mock, stub or spy. The latter, a spy, is what you need in this case, i.e. something like:

You could alternatively use:

i dont understant your code ,But why you not try use your checkbox as an array in java script, By try something like,

Example :

I'd recommend you try sending those hex values directly from the about:bluetooth-internals page and see if you can reproduce the connection error from there as well. See https://web.dev/bluetooth/#tips

If so, check out https://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/file-web-bluetooth-bugs to learn how to properly file a chromium bug so that the team can fix the underlying issue.

If not, could you share your JS code so that we can help you diagnose what could be going wrong in your code?

From DataSource Configuration in the docs:

Spring Boot can deduce the JDBC driver class for most databases from the URL. If you need to specify a specific class, you can use the spring.datasource.driver-class-name property.

So start without configuring anything and just putting the JDBC driver on the classpath. If it would not work, you can manually configure it.

As Vladimir Botka stated on the comment, ansible does that already. Most modules (including the user module) will ensure that the state you specify will be present on the machine, after ansible ran.
For example, if you specify that a certain user exists on the system, it will after you ran the playbook. It will be created if it didn't exist before, but it will not be added, if it already existed.

The catch is, that ansible will try to create the state you specified, possibly changing your existing users.
For example, let's assume your user already exists, but has changed the default shell to /bin/zsh while in your playbook you specify, that it should have /bin/bash. In that case, ansible will change the default shell to /bin/bash whenever you run your playbook.

If you don't care about existing users being modified (or you are sure they never will be) you can just run the user module for all users every time, as users will not be added twice.
Otherwise you can do this to check if a user exists and only add it if it does not:

Your issue is value capturing in lambda expressions.

The value of field WSUserJoinedToRoom is changed every time when receiving the last item so when the main thread frame playes it will execute both lambda actions which will both access the same WSUserJoinedToRoom value.

So in your case

• player 3 is received and stored into WSUserJoinedToRoom and you add the callback action
• player 1 is received and stored into WSUserJoinedToRoom and you add the callback action
• now the main thread executed Update and executes both actions which do read the user_id and user_name from the current WSUserJoinedToRoom (player 1), not the one it was when the callback was Enqueued!

Instead either store the two strings in local variables before: