nitpick | Distributed bug tracker built upon the project VCS

It seems that with java11 Update 9 (maybe also with update 8; not tested) maven-javadoc-plugin is able to correctly generate the Javadoc for multi-module projects without the need to alter the module-path.

For those interested how the actual Maven POM looks like:

• Parent POM
• POM for a shared module
• POM for a sharing and consuming module
• POM for the consuming module

Have it collect into a list shared across multiple steps and perform a conditional repeat:

Figured it out. we only needed to check the __typename property before returning the object data 'array':

The function dataRangeInput has an seperator- argument, the default is to. You may change this to your desired word.

overflow:hidden on the parent will lead to the same imperfect coloring. But you can use:

body { margin: 100px; }

this should work, but honestly, OP figured it himself as well, so +1 OP :)

The first problem is with the LSTM input_shape. input_shape = (20,85,1).

From the doc: https://keras.io/layers/recurrent/

LSTM layer expects 3D tensor with shape (batch_size, timesteps, input_dim).

model.add(tf.keras.layers.Dense(nb_classes, activation='softmax')) - this suggets you're doing a multi-class classification.

So, you need your y_train and y_test have to be one-hot-encoded. That means they must have dimension (number_of_samples, 3), where 3 denotes number of classes.

You need to apply tensorflow.keras.utils.to_categorical to them.

The value undefined is an arbitrary unknown value. You cannot use it do check that the result of a function is not defined. All functions in Isabelle are total.

If y is not in the range of f, then inv f y could be any value.

You could work around this by defining your own inverse function that uses an option type.

By axiomatisation, each type has one designated value that is undefined. This is not some separate value that lives outside the normal range of that type, i.e. undefined :: nat is a natural number, but you do not know which natural number it is, and in fact you will not be able to prove any non-trivial property about undefined. A trivial property in this context is one that holds for all values of the type.

Therefore, the statement undefined ≠ (0 :: nat) is not provable in Isabelle/HOL, and neither is its negation (bugs and inconsistencies aside).

For undefined :: bool in particular, we know that undefined = True ∨ undefined = False, but again, you will not be able to prove undefined = True or undefined = False.

For the unit type (the one-element type consisting only of the value () :: unit), however, you can prove undefined = (), since this is a trivial property.

As for your original problem, it sounds as if you have to change the way you model undefinedness in your application. Since you did not give any details about what you are doing, it is not really possible to give any specific advice about what to do. But trying to prove anything about undefined is not going to work.