pasta | Pretty-paste source code on Slack | Chat library

You can use a case statement:

You need to implement the static member variables sauces and drinks in functions.cpp and not in interfaces.h.

functions.cpp

It happened the same to me last friday. I think it has something to do with Cuda instalation in Google Colab but I don't know exactly the reason

The error says MemoryError. You must upgrade your ec2 instance to something with more memory. tensorflow is very memory hungry application.

You want a match in the array column value for every LIKE pattern in the given array of matches.

This query is tricky for two main reasons:

1. There is no array operator to compare a whole array to an array of LIKE patterns. (No "array contains" operator with pattern-matching.) The array column must be unnested.

2. It's not enough to simply count matches after unnesting, as one pattern can match multiple times, masking the absence of matches for another.

Rephrase the task like this:

"Return all rows where none of the input patterns fails to find a match."

This query implements it, as efficiently as possible:

The int record_compare_field_1(); declaration does not have a prototype. This is an obsolescent feature of the C17/C18 standard.

In the function call qsort(database, 5, sizeof(Record), record_compare_field_1);, the record_compare_field_1 argument has type int (*)() and qsort's compar parameter has type int (*)(const void *, const void *). This is allowed by this rule from C17 6.2.7:

— If only one type is a function type with a parameter type list (a function prototype), the composite type is a function prototype with the parameter type list.

The actual record_compare_field_1 function definition has the prototype int record_compare_field_1(Record, Record) where the Record type is defined by typedef char Record[3][8]. Since array parameters are adjusted to pointers, this is the same as the prototype int record_compare_field_1(char (*)[8], char (*)[8]).

qsort will call the passed in record_compare_field_1 function with the wrong prototype, leading to undefined behavior. Most C implementations use the same representation for all object pointer types, so it lets you get away with it.

To do it properly, the record_compare_field_1 function could be defined like this:

Find the parent_id record with item_id = 1, and then update all records whose parent_id equals parent_id.

I would use Lists of objects to define your data structure. And then LINQ to query, manipulate, etc. I think it will be more flexible and give you closer to what you want. Something like this:

Check if the file has a Byte Order Mark (BOM) in the first three characters. You can use hexdump (or any binary editor) to inspect it.

File with BOM: