with_advisory_lock | Advisory locking for ActiveRecord | Database library
kandi X-RAY | with_advisory_lock Summary
kandi X-RAY | with_advisory_lock Summary
Adds advisory locking (mutexes) to ActiveRecord 4.2, 5.x and 6.0, with ruby 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, when used with MySQL or PostgreSQL. SQLite resorts to file locking.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Returns true if the database has been enabled .
- Execute a block with a given block .
- Executes a block for a given block .
- Try to try to try to raise an exception .
- generate a hash
- Executes a block with the given lock .
- Create a lock
- Initialize a lock file
- Try to wait for a lock
- Create a file .
with_advisory_lock Key Features
with_advisory_lock Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on with_advisory_lock
QUESTION
I'm new to Rails and would like to add a table to my development database using rails migration script. Upon running rails db:migrate
, I got the NameError: wrong constant name 2040[MyMigrationClassName]
.
I thought I used a reserved class name, so I changed the names in the migration script + the views, models, and converters associated with it, but same error.
Why is this happening? Thank you in advanced for your help.
Here's the error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-25 at 10:00Turns out the migration file name db/migrate/20210312_2040_create_converter.rb
was erroneous.
The underscore in between the timestamp that was put for readability ended up messing the constant name by appending numbers, hence the Name Error: wrong constant name
.
I also:
- pluralized the filename since after removing the underscore, I got another error that asked for the pluralization
- removed the argument
:created at
aftert.timestamps
.
In the end, the file name became db/migrate/202103122040_create_converters.rb
and the migration ran smoothly.
QUESTION
I upgrade rails 4.2.10 to 6.0 step by step. But when I try to upgrade rails 5.2.4.4 to 6.0 I cant query like Object.all
it gives me undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass error. When I try to call Object
it gives me undefined method 'include?' for nil:NilClass. Even I cant run active storage's migration files which it creates after running rails active_storage:update
I didn't understand what is wrong and I didn't see anybody who lived same thing.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-16 at 12:40Your error message shows that the problem lies in the descriptive_statistics
(third party) gem. I found this issue in the project's github page -- which appears to be exactly your problem.
It also appears the issue has got nothing to do with rails upgrading, but rather, upgrading ruby to 2.4+
As suggested on the github issue, you can resolve it by doing:
QUESTION
I have created a web app in rails and I was using sqlite3. Now I am trying to deploy it with heroku which uses pg but I am running into this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-27 at 17:39From Rails 5 - when we reference a model, index on the foreign_key
is automatically created.
Just do it like below -
QUESTION
I'm using the with_advisory_lock
gem to try and ensure that a record is created only once. Here's the github url to the gem.
I have the following code, which sits in an operation class that I wrote to handle creating user subscriptions:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-07 at 21:57Are you turning off transactional tests for this test case? I'm working on something similar and that proved to be important to actually simulating the concurrency.
See uses_transaction
https://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/TestFixtures/ClassMethods.html
If transactions are not turned off, Rails will wrap the entire test in a transaction and this will cause all the threads to share one DB connection. Furthermore, in Postgres a session-level advisory lock can always be re-acquired within the same session. From the docs:
If a session already holds a given advisory lock, additional requests by it will always succeed, even if other sessions are awaiting the lock; this statement is true regardless of whether the existing lock hold and new request are at session level or transaction level.
Based on that I'm suspecting that your lock is always able to be acquired and therefore the .first_or_create
call is always executed which results in the intermittent RecordNotUnique
exceptions.
QUESTION
This is a migration file.
I have made timestamps fields auto-generated.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-18 at 21:48The line
QUESTION
Whenever I run bin/rails db:migrate
locally I run into the following error:
bin/rails db:migrate
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-10 at 21:59Did you check my_database.schema_migrations table? You may find that Rails has already marked this migration as executed.
See https://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_migrations.html#old-migrations
The users table may not exist because it's possible it was deleted manually.
QUESTION
Im trying to deploy a Ruby on Rails app on a Ubuntu 16.04 EC2 server but is giving a error about the difference between max_gram and min_gram on Elasticsearch, i don't have any experience with Elasticsearch yet so im totally lost here and i need some guidance to do this and learn how to set it to avoid this problems in the future.
The first time i did the deploy there was a error refusing the connection to localhost:9200 so i had to check if the service was running and even check the firewall and at the end i had to do a clean install and configure everything on elasticsearch.yml and now is running and working but when i try to deploy again is giving me a error, did a lot of search on internet there is a lot of documentation but i still don't get where to set these values.
This is the error im getting on the log:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-07 at 16:49I have faced a similar issue and below error message is clearly explaining the issue.
[400] {"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"The difference between max_gram and min_gram in NGram Tokenizer must be less than or equal to: 1 but was [49]. This limit can be set by changing the [index.max_ngram_diff] index level setting."}],"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"The difference between max_gram and min_gram in NGram Tokenizer must be less than or equal to: 1 but was [49]. This limit can be set by changing the [index.max_ngram_diff] index level setting."},"status":400}
Basically, by Default, the difference between max_gram and min_gram in NGram Tokenizer can't be more than 1 and if you want you to change this, then in your index settings you need to change it by adding below setting.
QUESTION
I just cloned a repository, so I am trying to setup locally, I get this strange error whenever I run rails db:migrate
, I have searched for a solution but none on here meets my need.
I have been particularly confused at this because it is my first time using rails 6.0 and I cannot tell if it is an issue with rails or something is wrong in the code, although following the trace the issue seems to be with the timestamps
type but I do not know what to do
Error
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-25 at 07:05t.timestamps
doesn't accept timestamp name, just hash/keyword arguments:
timestamps(options = {})
Adds timestamps (
created_at
andupdated_at
) columns to the table.
t.timestamps(null: false)
Docs
If you want to add expires_at
, you need to add it using a correct date type (e.g. datetime
:
QUESTION
I am getting a lot of issues, since midway through its installation, the migration files stop working and the remaining 2 won't migrate due to a jsonb issue. However, this repository works completely fine if I install it as a gem.
Repository - https://github.com/SpinaCMS/Spina
Versions:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-03 at 04:11It looks like you are trying to do this with a sqlite
database in your local system, and sqlite
does not have json
support, try changing your database to either mysql
, postgres
or a database system that has json support.
QUESTION
I am trying to import all migrations. However, the use of t.monetize :total, currency: { present: false }
within a create_table block seems to crash with the following error message:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-01 at 10:42Are you doing anything in an initializer that might affect the MoneyRails::Configuration#amount_column
? Looks like the OptionsExtractor
is missing a few things.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install with_advisory_lock
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page