string_pattern | Generate strings | Regex library
kandi X-RAY | string_pattern Summary
kandi X-RAY | string_pattern Summary
A pattern is a string where we supply these elements "a-b:c" where a is min_length, b is max_length (optional) and c is a set of symbol_type.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of string_pattern
string_pattern Key Features
string_pattern Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on string_pattern
QUESTION
I am attempting to find dot product between a dataframe and a column vector (another dataframe). The dataframe looks like below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 16:33You could do:
QUESTION
I have a single text string stored in a SQL table which contains all of the text below. The format is XML but the field definition is varchar.
I am using SQL Server 2012 to query this data:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-28 at 16:11If you declare your @step
variable as data type XML
instead of varchar
, you can use XQuery to process the data, in this case a FLOWR expression in curly braces within literal XML elements, the curly braces switch from literal mode to XPath mode:
QUESTION
I have a table named CLIENT_REPORT with CAMPAIGN_NAME and CAMPAIGN_ID that looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-12 at 19:44There are no doubt many ways you could approach this. One method is simply to reconstruct the string that you want:
QUESTION
I have a dataset which I need to clean using regex rules. These rules come from a file regex_rules.csv
with columns string_pattern
and string_replace
and are applied using a combination of prxparse
and prxchange
as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-29 at 18:53SAS stores character variables as fixed length strings that are padded with spaces. As a consequence string comparisons ignore trailing spaces. So x=' '
and x=' '
are the same test.
The CATS()
will remove all of the leading and trailing spaces, so empty strings will generate nothing at all. It sounds like you want to treat an empty string as a single space. The TRIM() function will return a single space for an empty string. So perhaps you just want to change this:
QUESTION
Do I only have to use (
and )
if the pattern consists of multiple groups?
So if the pattern is true|false
it doesn't matter if I add parenthesis or not, right?
Then again, if the pattern is POINT_PATTERN("\\((\\d+),(\\d+)\\)")
it does make a difference because I want to get two different values from it.
Can I write my current patterns, which are:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-15 at 20:16Yes, a sequence of characters or character classes is the default, and it is of higher precedence than the OR operator |
. So if you don't have anything in front or behind your sequence (clearly displayed in your cases of true|false
) then you don't need them.
However, if you want to use e.g. this is true|false
for "this is true"
or "this is false"
then the precedence will fail for "this is false"
and you need to group the true|false
, for instance using a non-capturing group, e.g. this is (?:true|false)
.
I don't see any problems with your expressions where you removed some of the parentheses. However, if you want to check them, then simply put them into an (online) checker that shows the precedence (e.g. this one) and check if the resulting "explanation" changes. The various IDE plugings for regexp testing will hopefully also provide a similar tree view for you.
Beware that you are sometimes using boundary matchers (^
and $
) and sometimes you are not. I'd expect those to be either used or not used.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install string_pattern
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page