fallout | Really easy Amazon EC2 backup/restore solution | Continuous Backup library

In the first case the string literal decays to pointer.

In the second case the string literal gets stored to an array of char that the compiler will automatically size to fit the literal complete with the null terminator.

With the second you are retaining more information in your variable. So for example you can call std::size on the second but not on the first.

Calling a printing function that takes const char* should be the same with both cases. Since in the second case the const char[] would decay to pointer at the moment of the function call.

You could try find a solution using the target sorting layer and alpha blending.

What I mean is to ensure that the object the flashlight will partially reveal is not overlapping unless that particular light source is showing it. A bit like in the example image below.

Click here to read more.

I think it would otherwise have to be done with a mask or a shader. I have once done a similar thing in a 3D environment but never in a 2D one, please see this solution for possible inspiration: unity3d trouble with ship floating on water

My suggestion is to look more into 2D shaders to try see if you can find a solution that way.

Instead of generating seven independent random numbers, generate seven numbers less than 40, and use their differences to generate your stats.

first

You can read the file with pandas.read_csv() with error_bad_lines=False:

So there are a couple of problems to fix right away... obsMovies.subscribe() returns a disposable that you are ignoring. Since the closure it's embedded in needs to return a disposable, how about just returning the one that subscribe created instead of making a new one:

For CTAD to work you can't supply any of the template parameters and since T can't be deduced, you need to supply the second template parameter too (that is, no CTAD).

Example:

You want outer joins not inner joins. Start with creator and left join movie_series, movies and genre. By using left joins you make sure that all creators are in the result -- a left join keeps all of the rows from the left relation.

And you only want to group by the creator, not by genre. Make sure however to include creator_id in the GROUP BY clause as only using the name columns could merge two actually different creators that just share one name.

Simply use an ORDER BY clause to sort the result by the count.

It looks like you are 90% of the way there already.

All you need to do is replace your paragraph with a table that's organized how you want, then you need to update multiple table cells every time you click the button instead of just updating the one paragraph.

How you update the table cells depends on how the data is stored.

For example, if you had all the titles in one array and all the directors in another array and the years in a third array, you'd have to update one cell with titlesArray[randomNumber] and another cell with directorsArray[randomNumber] and another with yearsArray[randomNumber] — and you'd have to make sure the movies were in order in each array and nothing was missing anywhere.

However, if at all possible, the easier solution is to store each movie's data as an object. This is a perfect use case.

Your array of strings would simply become an array of objects. You would get a new random number for the index of the array, then you'd reference the properties of the object at that index for the particulars of that movie.

Simple example here that you can build on: