muck | A tool for backing up remote MySQL databases | Continuous Backup library
kandi X-RAY | muck Summary
kandi X-RAY | muck Summary
Muck is a tool which will backup & store MySQL dump files from remote hosts. Through a simple configuration file, you can add hosts & databaes which you wish to be backed up and Muck will connect to those hosts over SSH, grab a dump file using mysqldump, gzip it and store it away on its own server.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Establishes a backup from the database .
- Tries to clean all master files in the master directory
- Save the backup .
- Create a new zip file .
- Parse a config file
- Archives all databases in the database .
- Initialize the database .
- Updates the master configuration
- Returns the path to the server
- Gets the last backup
muck Key Features
muck Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on muck
QUESTION
I wrote a query like
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-07 at 01:19Here's a demo:
QUESTION
I am trying to develop a minimal client-only SSL/TLS app to connect to an https server. It always fails on on 'SSL_connect(). I haven't installed any certificates.
Are certicates required in such a case?
I've found many answers on SO and elsewhere that say NO with the caveat "unless required by the server".
Details:
- I'm using the GitHub: OpenSSL package which I built from source.
- All SSL calls prior to SSL_connect succeed,
- On debugging, I see the error happening in function 'SSL_do_handshake' [returns -1].
- I'e tried several different https servers with the same result.
- I'm using MSVC 2019 on a Dell Optiplex Win10/64 machine
- Ideally, I'd like to avoid certificates to avoid having (non-tech-savvy) end-users having to muck with certificates.
Code Synopsis:
- Get method: TLS_client_method()
- Get CTX: SSL_CTX_new(method)
- Create socket 'sock'
- Connect sock to host on port 443
- Create SSL*: ssl=SSL_new(ctx)
- SSL_set_fd(ssl, sock)
- SSL_connect(ssl) [always fails]
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-15 at 23:59"no Applink" explains the failure -- even though it caused ERR_print_errors_fp to also fail.
On Windows to pass opened files or sockets from your exe to the OpenSSL library if linked as DLL (which is the default, but overridable) you must compile and link into your application exe the supplied file include/openssl/applink.c (note .c not .h -- it's an include file but not a header file). See https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man3/OPENSSL_Applink.html (though it's brief; I'm sure I've seen a better explanation somewhere, decades ago, but I can't find it now).
On MSVC I think you can just 'add' this file, or a copy, to your project and it will get compiled and linked automatically, but I no longer use it myself and can't verify. You may need to #include the file somewhere appropriate, like your main.c .
QUESTION
There appears to be a hundred questions that are very similar, but none seem to solve my issue.
I have a very basic bootstrap webform with two textboxes - each accepts a serial number that is populated by a handheld scanner attached to the PC. When the user scans the first barcode, the TextChanged event for txtLabelA fires a method that validates the serial number and switches focus to txtLabelB. When the user scans the second barcode it fires the TextChanged event for txtLabelB. This inserts the two values into a cross reference table in the database, displays a success message and clears the form for the next set of serial numbers. Very straight forward. This has worked flawlessly for a long time.
However, recently I was asked to add a button to the form that allows the user to manually type in a serial number and click Submit. This has now mucked everything up, because clicking the Submit button fires the OnClick AND the OnTextChanged events causing the form to postback twice. How can I prevent this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-12 at 18:15Use the AutoPostBack property to specify whether an automatic postback to the server will occur when the TextBox control loses focus. Pressing the ENTER or the TAB key while in the TextBox control is the most common way to change focus.
In my personal experience, barcode scanners essentially mimic a user typing in a barcode number and then pressing ENTER. If a user manually types in a barcode number and then clicks on the Submit button, then the TextBox is losing focus anyway and causing the additional Postback.
Recommendation: Remove the Button.Click event (or at least the logic within the Click handler.)
Note: If the TextBox control's parent container contains a button marked as the default button (for example, if the container's DefaultButton or DefaultButton property is set), the default button's Click event is not raised in response to the automatic postback.
QUESTION
I am searching for a solution where I can use Azure DevOps SDK to view repositories, branch, commit, etc. like a Blazor or other .NET platforms like WinForm.
Before I start mucking with the SDK and create an application using the APIs, for example, I would rather purchase or use a solution that is already out there without re-inventing the wheel.
I would be interested in any solution that someone had already tried or a paid solution.
Thanking you in advance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-13 at 09:49I am searching for a solution where I can use Azure DevOps SDK to view repositories, branch, commit
List all repositories via Azure DevOps REST API
QUESTION
Let's say you were mucking around in a developer instance of Plaid, with 25 accounts in use. As happens in development, the database exploded. So I do not have those access tokens anymore, but have 25 of the 100 slots used in my dev allotment.
I see how I might delete items -- if I had the access tokens. But is there any way to without the access tokens? Or a way of getting all access tokens associated with your plaid API?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 17:21Unfortunately there isn't a way to do it on your own, but even if there were, deleting access tokens doesn't free up slots in your dev environment. You can contact Support for help getting the tokens invalidated and/or getting your Dev token allocation increased.
QUESTION
I'm making a card game using C++. It's similar to solitaire, i.e. there are different stacks and piles and the cards are moved from one to another.
I'm using std::vector
for the various piles, but instead of std::vector
, I'm using std::vector>
. My rationale for doing this is that:
- It ensures that the ownership responsibility is with the
vector
that it is currently in. - It makes sure that I never accidentally have more than 1 copy of the same card when transferring between stacks and piles, i.e. forces me to transfer using
std::move
. - I don't have to implement my own copy and move constructors for
Card
.
Is this a reasonable way to use unique_ptr
?
EDIT: Forgot to mention, there are different types of Card
s which are derived from a base class. I'm a beginner and didn't want to muck around with different copy and move constructors at all levels.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-25 at 11:26
- It ensures that the ownership responsibility is with the vector that it is currently in.
This makes little sense to me. Vector owns all its elements, so unique pointer adds nothing of value in this regard.
- It makes sure that I never accidentally have more than 1 copy of the same card when transferring between stacks and piles, i.e. forces me to transfer using std::move.
If preventing copying is useful, then another alternative would be to make Card
non-copyable - or keep Card
copyable and create a non-copyable wrapper. In a way, std::unique_ptr
could be seen as such wrapper, but it is more than just a wrapper and unnecessarily inefficient and complicated for that use case. A simple example:
QUESTION
I've cobbled together (from various online sources) a script that can return data about AD users from a CSV file. It can clearly mark when a user has NOT been found, but perhaps just as important to me is a way of outputting a blank line to the CSV file when the input CSV file also has a blank. That would save a lot mucking around in Excel to make sure that all the blank lines correspond to each other (and subsequently where user data has been found). A 1-to-1 comparsion is the goal.
Here is what I have...
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-18 at 18:35If you want a normalized export you need a normalized Object, meaning, all columns for your CSV must exist for all lines, even if they're $null. Try this code, see if it works:
QUESTION
This page on Thread Safety by Microsoft says shared_ptr
should be used even if there are multiple copies sharing the same object.
So does this mean that both of the following are acceptable? I've tried both and they appear to work fine.
EDIT: The actual business objective is to get string updates from the long running thread to the main thread. I figured I should use shared_ptr
since string
is not thread safe. Don't care about ownership honestly.
Option 1 (Passing reference):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-03 at 10:15It is weird to accept shared_ptr
by reference as you lose the whole point of using shared_ptr
in the first place. You may just use a raw pointer instead.
There are cases when accepting by reference of shared_ptr
is legitimate but if you give a reference of it to a thread then it will cause UB once that instance of the shared_ptr
is destroyed and the thread still uses the shared_ptr
.
Primary purpose of shared_ptr
is to manage lifetime of the object. If you pass a reference of it to a thread then you throw away the whole purpose and advantages of the shared_ptr
.
QUESTION
tl;dnr
I can not get my docker-compose Envoy API gateway to properly forward to referenced services.
"Forwarded routes" always end up with the error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-28 at 14:32I'm going to give it a few more days, but I think I discovered the issues ... which appear to be fat-fingers, copy & paste.
- I removed the offending empty http2 options as mentioned in the above comment. This resolved in the clusters being a bit cleaner:
QUESTION
I'm debugging some code in PyCharm by stepping through line-by-line. The code involves a long for-loop, but for debugging purposes, I don't need to iterate through the whole thing. Instead, I'd like to break out after a few iterations. I'm trying to figure out how to do so without modifying my code to have special debugging instructions.
Example for loop
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-28 at 17:40I dislike doing this because inevitably, one of these special instructions gets left in after debugging is finished and mucks everything up.
Python for
loops just aren't designed to be changed during execution, besides hard coding break
, return
or throwing StopIteration
. (You are debugging, so either change the range in the loops expression list, or let it run through). The reason being the advantages of straightforward simplicity outweigh exposing the for
loop counter - see PEP 212.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install muck
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page