thy | A minimal , strict runtime type system for Ruby | Functional Programming library

Please try commenting out the references to projectile in core/prelude-editor.el. Restart emacs, then run M-x package-list-packages. Type U when the package list has refreshed, then x to install the packages. After the packages have refreshed, quit emacs, uncomment what you commented out in core/prelude-editor.el and restart emacs.

I found the solution, there is error in sql grammar. Problem releates with a stored procedure/function in db side which triggerred with a new insert. Stack trace not contains this exception , I found it in weblogic logs.

But this is a strange problem , because stored procedure/function works good with local weblogic invoke but in test system, it worked when I change a semicolon(,) with a dot(.) in stored procedure/function.

Following my comment above

You might have an easier time of it if you split into lines first, and then split into words, because I expect the abbreviated character names will always be at the start of a line? Also, I notice the line is indented a couple spaces when a new character starts speaking. That could be another thing to look for.

Split into lines:

They do the same thing. If you run the query in the console, you will see something like this

There is no need to put theory files into the Isabelle distribution (on the contrary, I'd better keep it intact to make sure your development can be used on other machines without touching Isabelle installation).

The issue with the failing proof lies in a different area: the definition of add_123 is inductive on the first argument and has no immediate rule how to handle the expression specified in lemma_02. (E.g., lemma add_01: "add_123 0 m = m" could be proved the way you used because it matches the first case specified in the definition.)

The solution is to use a proof by induction on the first argument:

There are a couple of things I'd like to point out. They won't fix anything though.

• Instead of subtracting 3 of t, set t=0 instead. t-=3 might cause t to go to negatives (unless this was on purpose)
• The while loop will stop as soon as t exceeds max_tries. This means that it might not "retry" every time. while True: or while bool will fix it. (bool can be a variable of boolean type).
• You don't specify num after you guess correctly and play again. Just put num = random.randint(1,10) right before continue.

Now, back to your original question:

Your else statement will never be reached. This is because all the conditions (num < answer, num > answer, and num == answer) are all specified. There is no other possible operation between num and answer that you can do, hence else will never be reached.

To fix this, you can use an if statement before the first current if.

You've activated the screencast mode.

To disable it, press Ctrl+Shift+P (Win, Linux) or Cmd+Shift+P (Mac) and search for Toggle Screencast Mode.

Press Enter to deactivate it. (Repeat the steps to activate it)

You are probably looking for this: