randexp | generate random data from a Regular Expression | Regex library
kandi X-RAY | randexp Summary
kandi X-RAY | randexp Summary
Randexp by Ben Burkert
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of randexp
randexp Key Features
randexp Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on randexp
QUESTION
I have a project that I would like to turn into a NuGet package in an Azure DevOps CI build. The relevant files in the solution look like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-01 at 21:05According to the docs, you are missing required parameter for this task
QUESTION
Currently doing maintenance for a project that was running React v15. Upgraded Webpack 3 > 4, Babel 6 > 7, css-loader 0.28.x > 3.0.0, etc.
Initially, updated React and used all the react-codemod + jscodeshift to transform the js files. While the version at that stage was not stable, it loaded and showed the proper styles etc.
What I find odd, is that after updating file-loader, css-loader, babel, and related packages, I kept getting Module not found: Error: Can't resolve
, as following:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-29 at 21:52I got back to this issue and noticed that at some point past 0.28.x css-loader requires the prefix ~ for aliases.
Find "To import styles from a node_modules path (include resolve.modules) and for alias, prefix it with a ~" in https://github.com/webpack-contrib/css-loader
QUESTION
I'm trying to fix my PR in node restify npm package. Unfortunately travis job is failing for node 4 with the following error;
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-21 at 10:07I've found the solution and fixed the build. It was not because of the file it was reported on but because of postinstall script. I missed it to update as per node 4 compatible changes as it was not the part of actual source code.
I'm still not able to relate the bug with actual problem. But solved it.
QUESTION
I have the following regex, wherein no digits must repeat:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Aug-08 at 16:14There may be an issue with 'Fent JS' lib itself. Your regex works fine. You could try this instead. Generate random 3 digit number in javascript using Math.floor((Math.random() * 1000))
and then test your regex (^(?!.*(.).*\1)\d{3}$
) against it to see if it matches and then use the matched number.
QUESTION
I have a very simple javascript program which involves generating random strings of characters from a given set of allowed characters.
Generating random strings from a regular expression with randexp.js seems to be the most appropriate way to do so. However, since the set of allowed characters is a very simple one (basically all uppercase characters from the English alphabet and all digits) I wonder if loading an entire library isn't a bit overkill for such purpose. Instead I'm doing something like the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-08 at 05:38This is arguably a great use case for randexp.js (GitHub), a JavaScript library that generates random strings based on regex patterns. It is very powerful and can be used for all sorts of things.
QUESTION
I need to generate a string based on regex which would result random letters and numbers, 4 dashes at random places in 36-character string.
Example:
123A5678-01B3C5F7-901R345-789F1-3456
I've figured out a regex that seems to validate given string well:
(?=.{36}$)([0-9A-Z]+-){4}([0-9A-Z])+
...but using the same for generating string in RandExp ends up in a mess. It generates 36-character string and adds 5 random-length groups:
new RandExp(/(?=.{36}$)([0-9A-Z]+-){4}([0-9A-Z])+/).gen()
M78QMOC6OGIF5OAJAJCG68CQWJGT5FX43CTKZ9CS9GXWLEKUKZMG602U5HPR4CEKO7OIX45CMLB7DS5RHZBI8KE8HGO9ET6OWS9A-PQSHN9E36KIMW328A1L0BHXCFOJVCD2ZT11-KD03XTZ375WP7CR7YSF4CTSX-0FBJ3MZ4RNDLA5UZOHI5QWVY66PTUDDRCG-OH4F688VM1
Should I just settle for fixed-width groups for my string using something like:
([0-9A-Z]{6}-){4}[0-9A-Z]{8}
... or is there any way I could improve the original regex?
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-24 at 05:29It seems impossible to use a whole string length restricting lookahead with Randexp
. I also tried with your pattern, and it generates a string with n chars of any type, like $>Qa MG4XT@#j{3#&[+V4=^"VQLI*|b%bp~@
(1).
It is even more strange when you apply anchors, new RandExp(/^(?=.{36}$)(?:[0-9A-Z]+-){4}[0-9A-Z]+$/)
will also produce some ~30 chars of various types at the start of the string. It might be related to the fact that $
is not used at the final pattern position, and is ignored (see Bad Regular Expressions). It looks like a bug to me.
Removing the lookahead and adding ^
start-of-string anchor at the start and $
end-of-string anchor at the end makes it generate somewhat better strings (2). However, you might really want to only use fixed length groups (3).
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install randexp
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page