BadFruit | Ruby Gem for Rotten Tomatoes | Application Framework library
kandi X-RAY | BadFruit Summary
kandi X-RAY | BadFruit Summary
This is a rough gem to interface with the Rotten Tomatoes API.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- returns a list of actors that the given a list can be used to get a list of items
- Get info about a particular movie id
- Search for a movie .
- Handle HTTP GET response
- Retrieve a list of all movies in a movie .
- Parse a hash of actors
- Parse a hash of movies
- search for a movie by id
- Search by id
- Get the info for a movie id .
BadFruit Key Features
BadFruit Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on BadFruit
QUESTION
I have data that I need to pass to input parameter in html but it is in html. How can I do that? What is the correct syntax for that
HTML
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-23 at 15:22Try Using: [badFruits]="fruit.badFruit"
QUESTION
I have a Fruit
class like this.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 09:01While technical alternatives have been suggested in comments, I'd like to add another perspective. What we're seeing here is a class design problem which comes up when attempting to use inheritance for anything other than a true generalization/specialization relationship.
The example declares:
- Each
Fruit
must be able toconsume
anotherFruit
. - An
Apple
is a kind ofFruit
.
Then the idea is:
- An
Apple
must notconsume
any kind ofFruit
, but anApple
only. 🚫
If an Apple
were really a Fruit
, it would fully adhere to the Fruit
's declaration and be able to consume
another Fruit
of any kind. As the intended apple Apple
violates rule 1, is not really a Fruit
and the language prevents you from declaring it as such.
Trying to work around this (e.g. via runtime checks in overridden methods) masquerades the underlying problem and introduces surprises to those using such classes.
Solution:
- Use inheritance for true generalization/specialization relationships only. If it is 100% certain, no strings attached, that an apple is a fruit, inheritance is a perfect fit. Otherwise it is not.
- In this case: Rethink the intended semantics:
- What's the real meaning of
consume
? - Is there a notion of a fruit consuming an arbitrary (potentially incompatible specialization of another) fruit?
- Or is it rather individual specializations of fruit which each have their own independent notion of consuming? Then there would be no common
consume
method at theFruit
level.
- What's the real meaning of
Answering the additional question in the comment:
how can I make sure this will copy properties of both SourFruit and CoreFruit?
I'd rather not express SweetFruit
and SourFruit
as specializations of a CoreFruit
. Flavors such as sweet and sour are traits of a fruit and better expressed as properties.
But I could extend your example a bit and then suggest a class design which includes a clone()
function providing a deep copy functionality on a base class Flavor
. Note that the output shows different hash codes for cloned objects:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install BadFruit
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page