obfuscator | production database dump can often be

 by   bryanwoods Ruby Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | obfuscator Summary

kandi X-RAY | obfuscator Summary

obfuscator is a Ruby library typically used in Manufacturing, Utilities, Machinery, Process applications. obfuscator has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Working from a production database dump can often be helpful for debugging strange errors and edge cases, but having potentially sensitive user data on a development machine is a dangerous liability. Obfuscator provides a clean, friendly API for obfuscating sensitive columns in your Ruby on Rails application's models.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              obfuscator has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 6 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              obfuscator has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of obfuscator is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              obfuscator has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              obfuscator has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              obfuscator code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              obfuscator is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              obfuscator releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 377 lines of code, 14 functions and 10 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed obfuscator and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into obfuscator implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • returns a hash representing the values of the values of the original values to be saved as a column
            • Determine the default value for a given type
            • Remove all records from the database
            • Removes all records from the database
            • Stores all values in the data type
            • Returns true if the column exists
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            obfuscator Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for obfuscator.

            obfuscator Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for obfuscator.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            .NET: How to isolate an anti-debugging class library?
            Asked 2021-Dec-21 at 12:20

            I built a .NET class library and used an obfuscator to obfuscate it with anti-debugging.

            I built a testing project using my obfuscated class library. I would have hoped that anti-debugging forbids debugger to step into my class library. But it simply threw exception "Debugger detected" when my class library was invoked when I started the project in debugging mode (by pressing "F5" in Visual Studio).

            What this means is that if a project uses my library then the developer simply cannot debug at all. They may have millions of lines of code that has nothing to do with my library. Not being able to debug at all in their project will only mean one thing: they will not use my library.

            Is there anyway a developer can do to "isolate" my library, so that they can debug elsewhere?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-21 at 12:20

            Anti-debugging is a well-known feature since the times of exe packers. Unfortunately, it is a process-wide thing. Usually, .NET obfuscators check debugger-specific environment variables.

            There is no way to prevent a debugger from stepping into your assembly.

            I would say that anti-debugging is for those who want to protect their end-user products, not libraries.

            You can virtualize your code (modern obfuscators like ArmDot provide this feature), so debugging it would have almost no sense.

            Another idea is to isolate sensitive code to a separate process that runs with the enabled anti-debugging feature. On the client-side, you just provide a proxy that redirects all calls to the process.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70429436

            QUESTION

            Is it possible to rename all variables in Visual Studio 2022
            Asked 2021-Dec-17 at 10:01

            I decompiled the dll that my app creates for publishing it and found out, that everything is easy to read. The app is not rocket science but I'd like to hide some things, e. g. there are constants that are called productionHourlyRate what no one should know. I know, there are obfuscation softwares but they are expensive. An easy way would be to rename all variables and methods before publication, e. g. productionHourlyRate -> v1. Is there a built in possibility to do (and undo) this in Visual Studio 2022. Of course, I could rename them one by one but this is not very comfortable.

            Or: Is there a free obfuscator that makes dlls undecompilable? No matter which tool I read about, I always find comments like "I decompiled the obfuscated dll with xyz and received the whole source code.".

            Many thanks, Philipp

            Edit: It is a C#/.Net app (Blazor WebAssembly)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-17 at 10:01

            Since there was no answer to this question, there is probably no Visual Studio built in solution.

            So, I created an Excel tool that renames alle class, method and variable names in the specified files. Please find it here.

            Important: Make sure, you run this obuscator only when using a version control tool. You CANNOT undo the obfuscation with this Excel tool.

            Usage

            1. Add file paths in worksheet "files".
            2. Run macro "Obfuscate" to obfuscate class, method and variable names with "v1", "v2"…
            3. Publish your app.
            4. Undo the changes with your version control tool.

            Once all files are manually listed, the obfuscation should only take a few seconds.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70202522

            QUESTION

            Error: It looks like your application or one of its dependencies is using i18n after recompile angular 13.1
            Asked 2021-Dec-15 at 10:59

            I'm working on an Angular project 13.0.1
            I just updated it to 13.1.0
            my package.json

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-15 at 10:59

            In polyfills.ts, comment import '@angular/localize/init'; and add import '../node_modules/@angular/localize/init';

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70322914

            QUESTION

            Use Obfuscar for publishing applications
            Asked 2021-Nov-15 at 14:24

            I am able to obfuscate a .dll in my visual studio solution upon running it.

            The problem is that I have no idea how this can be done upon publishing the application into an .exe. Because the source code of the dll inside the published exe can still be seen with a de-obfuscator.

            Could someone help me out please? Thanks in advance.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-15 at 14:24

            I just found the solution. By installing obfuscar.globaltool (Img. 01). (Img. 1)

            And adding the following code to my .csproj file (Img. 02) (Img. 02)

            This allowed me to change the dll file on publish.

            Thanks everyone for helping me solve this. I really appreciate it!

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69973447

            QUESTION

            Unable to compile llvm pass on Windows using Visual studio
            Asked 2021-Oct-22 at 09:46

            Im learning how to use the llvm toolchain on Windows. I compiled and installed llvm using the following cmake command

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-22 at 09:46

            Solved by adding to the cmake file:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69662935

            QUESTION

            react-native-obfuscator crash for a specific file
            Asked 2021-Sep-16 at 03:31

            I'm trying to obfuscate my JS code using the lib react-native-obfuscator. I need to hide the API keys from my code, but I'm getting the following error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-16 at 03:31

            I tried react-native-obfuscator and man it has to many issues.

            So I am using obfuscator-io-metro-plugin and its working great.

            Here I will post my settings for you to see.

            in metro.config.js Add the following and it will obfuscator all string and js code related files.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69201909

            QUESTION

            Why does this remove all "%" lua
            Asked 2021-Jul-31 at 20:39

            So I am working on this obfuscator and when I add my encoding algorithm after the first ")" it removes all "%" in the algorithm, how do I fix this?

            Here is the way i do it:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jul-31 at 20:39

            I suggest reading the PIL regarding captures. The symbol % is a special character, therefore you need to escape it:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68605626

            QUESTION

            how would I make this script less laggy? lua
            Asked 2021-Jul-29 at 18:04

            So I am working on a obfuscator but when I add the string decoding algorithm it is really laggy because of this script:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jul-29 at 18:04

            You're going through the whole string, just to concat something after the first occurrence of ). You could use newScript:find('%)') to find the location of the first ), then simply concat the parts:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68580053

            QUESTION

            How do I obfuscate Javascript in Ember?
            Asked 2021-Apr-21 at 16:20

            Does anyone know how to use the javascript-obfuscator (or similar) in Ember ?

            I guess it needs to be called inside ember-cli-build.js but I don't know where and how.

            Thank you in advance for any help :)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-21 at 16:20

            I don't think there's a really straightforward answer to this. If you're running on embroider, then all your Javascript will be handled by webpack, so you could try using webpack-obfuscator -- in your ember-cli-build.js something like

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67184837

            QUESTION

            Cannot drop outgoing traffic using XDP
            Asked 2021-Mar-28 at 11:12

            I'm just learning about XDP. During my journey, I came across a case which I could not make any sense of. I was trying some fancy things on certain UDP packets when I noticed nothing was changing. So I tried to reproduce the problem with a minimal example. Here is the minimal example:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-28 at 11:12

            While digging through Google searches, I came across this issue on GitHub: https://github.com/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng/pull/33

            ... since XDP doesn't handle outgoing traffic.

            As it turns out, XDP does not handle outgoing packets. I have no idea why it took me this long to come across this. Turns out I've been misunderstanding things.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66840614

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install obfuscator

            Add this line to your application's Gemfile:.

            Support

            Fork itCreate your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Added some feature')Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)Create new Pull Request
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/bryanwoods/obfuscator.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone bryanwoods/obfuscator

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:bryanwoods/obfuscator.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link