sequenced | Generate scoped sequential IDs for ActiveRecord models | Application Framework library

I want to trigger the self._runSequence() func directly after start the timer. This is my code:

I have data stored on the DB as gaps and islands and I need to join it with another table. the gaps and islands table like the below:

Is

I'm trying to merge multiple sets of 2 fastq files from the same sequencing library. I have a txt file with all the sample names in it. The samples were sequenced in paired-end so there're both _1.fastq.gz and _2.fastq.gz files associated with each sample.

SRR_Acc_list.txt
SRR1
SRR2
SRR3
SRR4
...

The following code is what I'm trying to achieve: combining SRR1 and SRR2 for both read 1 and read 2 into one fastq files in the output folder combined_fastq.

I'm currently working over an app similar to good old Tamagotchi with modern twists. Right now I prepared some code and didn't need any character animations but now I'm stuck. I want to make a scaffold with title, line of buttons below it, yet still on top of the screen, second bunch on bottom and create some kind of interactivity inside between those two, with character made from assets, some animations and reactions on touch. To be clear - something like this:

I am in a situation where I am forced to use a std::vector container as my underlying data structure. I'm trying to exploit boost::multi_index::sequenced<> to shadow the vector offset, and provide a mechanism for richer data queries. I really don't want to unnecessarily copy all the data from one container to another.

In the example code snippet below I have a class BarInterface that manages the insertion and removal of elements to the Bar::foos container. Initially I tried to store references to the vector elements as elements of the typedef boost::multi_index_container, but these are not stable against insertions.

What I'd like to do is have a custom key extractor that is a function of the _bar container and the boost::multi_index::sequenced<> index. So, for example to get the name of an element, I'd find the sequence offset x, and then _bar.foos[x].name. So, I'm really just using boost::multi_index as a proxy for richer queries against a vector of variable size.

I'm trying to get data from base58 combination by appending to the end of strings.

Hello dear colleagues,

First thing first, this is my first time I'm asking a question here so I hope I'll be clear. I'm currently facing some challenges when dealing with a lot of dataframes with variable lengths and non-regular colnames. The challenge is to remove unwanted rows (here rows for samples sequenced as Whole genome shotgun sequencing) matching multiple keywords, indeed it would we to easy to have a single keyword ... For that purpose I'm unsing filter_all(any_vars(str_detect(., "WGS")). However, trying to negate the code with negate=T or !str_detect() return the whole dataframe and nothing seems to work. Using all_vars() remove every rows in the df. I came around a solution but I find it quite heavy and I'm pretty sure there is a better way to perform this :

In section except.ctor, the rule states:

1. As control passes from the point where an exception is thrown to a handler, objects with automatic storage duration are destroyed by a process, specified in this subclause, called stack unwinding.
2. [...]
3. If the initialization or destruction of an object other than by delegating constructor is terminated by an exception, the destructor is invoked for each of the object's direct subobjects and, for a complete object, virtual base class subobjects, whose initialization has completed ([dcl.init]) and whose destructor has not yet begun execution, except that in the case of destruction, the variant members of a union-like class are not destroyed. [ Note: If such an object has a reference member that extends the lifetime of a temporary object, this ends the lifetime of the reference member, so the lifetime of the temporary object is effectively not extended. — end note ] The subobjects are destroyed in the reverse order of the completion of their construction. Such destruction is sequenced before entering a handler of the function-try-block of the constructor or destructor, if any.

According to bullet 3, which states can be also considered as a part of the process of stack unwinding. Since the first rule sounds like that the invocation of stack unwinding is only for the object with automatic storage duration. Doesn't that stack unwinding invoke for the object with dynamic storage duration or others duration?