achilles | A web-based client to manage Nessus scans | Security Testing library

I believe the problem relies in the append_to_csv function because of a wrong indentation.

Look at your code:

Because add_rewrite_endpoint only create the endpoint, but doesn't configure the display function for this endpoint.

You have to use woocommerce_account__endpoint action. And then, call the desired template part with wc_get_template_part

There are several ways to do it.

The first way that I have used in the production environment for a year is that, you can use JSON or Protobuf to pass all the data between Rust and Dart/Flutter. By doing this, you do not need to write down tons of boilerplate code to allocate/free a String, a List of bytes, a struct/class, etc. All you need to do is to write down one single function that accepts a byte array payload and outputs a byte array result. By saying "one" function, I mean, you can have an action field in your JSON/Protobuf, so calls to indeed different Rust functions can be interleaved into this one thin interface.

Despite its convenience (only a bit of unsafe boilerplate), the drawback is also evident. The serialization and deserialization does not come for free. You will have to pay the CPU time and memory for it, which can be quite large sometimes. Moreover, you cannot easily pass around big objects. For example, if you have an image (you know, at least megabytes of size), serializing it to Protobuf, then deserialize it from Protobuf can be quite a waste of both CPU and memory - useless copies! Even worse, since Flutter/Dart FFI does not support a convenient way of async FFI, you have to make it running in a separate worker isolate - one more memory copy. You can see more here: https://github.com/dart-lang/language/issues/1862 (this is an issue that I opened).

The second way that I use recently is to write down a code generator. Indeed the code follows several common patterns, such as "allocate - fill data - call FFI - free", etc. So it is not that hard to write a generator to automatically do such kind of things. The idea is to mimic what human beings will do when they write down boilerplate code manually.

I did hope that there already exist some code generator such that I could directly use, but it seemed that none exists... So, go and write it by yourself.

After I write down the code generator, I guess people may have the same problem as me, so I open-sourced it: https://github.com/fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

Indeed, my code generator not only solves the problem above, but also have rich type support, allows zero-copy, allows async programming and direct call from main isolate, etc, which can be implemented via code generator but will require lots of boilerplate code if you do it by hand.

Disclaimer: This is a Q&A-style answer to show my thoughts and what I have done on this problem that is critical to my own app in production environment. Indeed I have used the JSON approach since last year, and later refactor into the code generator approach. Hope it also helps other people who faces the same situation!

Use this:

To fix your issue, you can enable the save button in a separate observer, and not inside the observeEvent. Try this

To find the table, see this example:

Your name choices are more naturally organized as Radiobutton widgets.

I took a look at the code and I see some issues, you have to remove the second let obj inside then, and in the condition you are comparing strings so obj === clear should be obj === "clear" your code should look like this

I think a lot of what you did, specifically around data wrangling, was not necessary, especially since you called d3.hierarchy() and d3.cluster() afterwards. I've replaced this with d3.stratify (which deals with hierarchical data that is not yet in the right format).

I've also replaced d3.cluster with d3.tree() because it was unclear to me why you'd want to use d3.cluster here. Your data has multiple parents, multiple roots and even floating nodes, and d3 is not meant to deal with that. My workaround has been to attach pseudonodes to every level, so as to make sure that there is only one node and that all nodes are at the right level at all times. To make sure the links were drawn correctly, I've written a custom getLinks function, that can deal with multiple parents.

I've also written a custom link generator that draws the links somewhat in the way that you want them. d3 doesn't offer much of flexibility here, but you can use the source code for inspiration.

Edit

I've changed the logic to be more focused on which "partners" got a child, so both links to the same child are on the same level - like in your picture. I've also drawn the nodes based on how many partners they have, and have given every link an offset so the lines are more distinct.

I've sorted the nodes so that the real pro-creators are at the top (Zeus), which gives a more balanced and less crowded view.