paperclip-aws | Storage module to official 'aws-sdk ' gem for Amazon S3 | Cloud Storage library
kandi X-RAY | paperclip-aws Summary
kandi X-RAY | paperclip-aws Summary
Storage module to official 'aws-sdk' gem for Amazon S3
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of paperclip-aws
paperclip-aws Key Features
paperclip-aws Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on paperclip-aws
QUESTION
I have 2 apps I have re-written from older versions of Rails (3.2 and 4.2.1) to Rails v6.1.4.1 and they both use the s3_direct_upload gem.
On Both apps I do not get any errors in the Webdev console or in the Rails console or in the log or ANYPLACE I can find. The buckets are displaying just fine in the case of Both Apps.
I checked the CORS Setup and it is fine. Both of these apps are currently running on Heroku with the code the same way it is now but are working.
Does anyone know if the s3_direct_upload gem actually works with Rails 6?
I get the file select window, I choose the filename, it shows the filename but instead of it starting the upload and showing the progress bar it just acts as if I did nothing at that point. No errors no nothing anyplace I can find. When I have the original app side by side at that point I should see a quick progress bar come up and then go away, the page refreshes and shows the new file. IN the 2 Apps I have re-written, it never gets past the file select and showing the file name of what I have selected. I will show the general files so at least that can be seen:
So that is question 1, does the s3_direct_upload gem work in Rails 6?
Here are the basic files that are required:
s3_direct_upload.rb
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 20:15I can confirm if you pull the latest version of the s3_direct_upload gem it does in fact properly upload to Amazon S3 using Rails 6, aws-sdk-v1 and Paperclip.
To do this you have to pull the s3_direct_upload as a plugin instead of a GEM and you can do this by putting this in your gemfile:
QUESTION
I am more of a Java programmer and still somewhat new to development (2 years or so, can write Java code & web apps just fine) however the company I work for has 4 Rails applications and was asked to get this application working called CtrlPanel. I have been having to learn Ruby on Rails in order to help get this issue with this app fixed and get it working.
I have been working on this problem for over a week all day long every day and nothing I do is fixing it.
I fixed everything to the point the app comes up, web server runs serves the pages but all views are white screens as long as this application.html.haml file is present. I re-wrote the file with very basic bootstrap and it sort of works but nothing looks right. The problem seems to stem from 1 single like that simply says: = javascript_include_tag "application"
I have been all over the internet and have tried every single fix from changing coffee-script-source to v1.8.0 as I read Windows has an issue with newer rails and that file, I have tried every variation of changing it from application to default, and every type of ending you can think of no matter what I do it gives me this error message which I can not seem to find.
I am not even sure WHAT that line does, I assume it has to do with the new Google Maps API and I verified the key is valid and it was working before.
This is the error is it giving it says the line with "= javascript_include_tag" "application" giving error ExecJS::RuntimeError at / SyntaxError: [stdin]:1:1: unexpected //=
I am running a PC on Windows 10 20H2 x64 UEFI ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x64-mingw32] Rails 6.1.3
(I did also install Ubuntu on another machine and it gives the exact same error, also gives the same error on another Windows machine)
The app is working IF I delete the "application.html.haml" file and put in a skeleton basic version all of the other views start working but of course none of them look right no menus no bootstrap no nothing.
Here is the application.html.haml file.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 18:59I did finally figure out what this was.
The older versions of rails in this case v4.2.1 used the javascript_include_tag for the line that deals with application:
= javascript_include_tag "application"
In the newer versions of rails in my case v6.1.3.1 you have to use javascript_pack_tag
= javascript_pack_tag
This solved the issue and the views all started working. I did mention above I was working on a PC running Rails v6.1.3; however I noticed I didn't make it clear that I was also having to upgrade this program from Ruby v2.2.2 and Rails v4.2.1 to Ruby v 2.7.2 and Rails v6.1.3, that might have helped to have made that more clear. Apologies if that confused anyone. I am still VERY new to Rails and using StackOverflow.com. I am happy to report I have only 1 single issue left on this program and the rest of the program is all working properly. I will be posting another question in fact because the last issue deals with a complicated scope query and it uses different syntax again due to the newer version of rails and I haven't been able to figure it out. In any even if you are running an older version of Rails and you are trying to get the program to work on a newer version (my case as I couldn't get rails v4.2 to run or work on ANYTHING, PC, Linux nothing) then you have to change the include_tag to a pack_tag. I do not pretend to say I fully understand why. I know it has to do with webpacker but beyond that I am still learning Rails. Perhaps someone with more knowledge than myself can shed some insite as to why the syntax changed. Oh and in addition the line ended up needing to read as follows:
= javascript_pack_tag "application", "data-turbolinks-track": "reload"
I didn't have the turbolinks reference either.
I hope this helps someone else in a similar situation that I was in, it was not easy to find. I only discovered it when I went through some tutorials on making other generic apps and saw the difference on that line.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install paperclip-aws
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page