lobsters | Computing-focused community centered around link | Application Framework library

by lobsters Ruby Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | lobsters Summary

lobsters is a Ruby library typically used in Server, Application Framework, Ruby On Rails applications. lobsters has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. However lobsters has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

This is the quite sad source code to the ghost town at It is a Rails codebase and uses a SQL (MariaDB in production) backend for the database. You are free to use this code to start your own sister site because the code is available under a permissive license (3-clause BSD). We welcome bug reports and code contributions that help use improve lobste.rs. As a volunteer project we're reluctant to take on work that's not useful to our site, so please understand if we don't want to adopt your custom feature. We'd love to have your help. Please see the CONTRIBUTING file for details. Use the steps below for a local install or lobsters-ansible for our production deployment config. There's an external project docker-lobsters if you want to use Docker. Basic moderation happens on-site, but most other administrative tasks require use of the rails console in production. Administrators can create and edit tags at /tags.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

lobsters has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 3503 star(s) with 739 fork(s). There are 65 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 112 open issues and 473 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 107 days. There are 21 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of lobsters is current.

Quality

lobsters has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

lobsters has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

lobsters code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

lobsters has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

lobsters releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

lobsters saves you 8651 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 17739 lines of code, 680 functions and 355 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed lobsters and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into lobsters implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Initialize a new Client .
Returns the IP address for this connection .
Returns the value of a string

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

lobsters Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for lobsters.

lobsters Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for lobsters.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on lobsters

What's the best way to work around function name conflicts in R?

QUESTION

What's the best way to work around function name conflicts in R?

Asked 2020-Apr-04 at 20:00

In loading a few packages to work with some data, I received an error when I tried to use the function select() from the dplyr package. I was trying to use a new package (to me), MASS, so I was easily able to diagnose and get things working properly. This experience made me curious, though, about the optimal way to work in a world of many packages, with functions that conflict with one another.

Consider the following code and error message:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Apr-03 at 17:05

Using dplyr::select avoids ambiguity. In my opinion, that's the best you can do.

The drawback of not calling library(dplyr) is that the pipe is not in available. You can still do library(magrittr) to get it available. Or you can have a look at the nice import package that is very useful if you don't want to attach packages. Basically, if you do import::from("magrittr", "%>%"), you can use the pipe without attaching any package.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61016791

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install lobsters

You can download it from GitHub.
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: