query-parser | tutorial for building a query parser using Ruby Parslet | Parser library

 by   look Ruby Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | query-parser Summary

kandi X-RAY | query-parser Summary

query-parser is a Ruby library typically used in Utilities, Parser, Nodejs applications. query-parser has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This is example code for my tutorial Build a query parser.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              query-parser has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 36 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of query-parser is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              query-parser has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              query-parser has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              query-parser code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              query-parser does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              query-parser releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 1144 lines of code, 71 functions and 19 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed query-parser and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into query-parser implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Convert the query to Elasticsearch
            • Convert to Solr search results
            • Convert search to search criteria
            • Get the date for a given date
            • Match a phrase .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            query-parser Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for query-parser.

            query-parser Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for query-parser.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Search with special character "-" not working in Apache Solr
            Asked 2021-Aug-05 at 11:03

            I have Customer data indexed in Apache Solr with details such as name, address, contact numbers, birth date, etc.

            I am trying to search the index with the following query, but couldn't get any results.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Aug-05 at 11:03

            The below query works well with forward-slash (/).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68662092

            QUESTION

            solr - search with a trailing wildcard does not return the expected results
            Asked 2021-Feb-04 at 08:12

            I have this document indexed on Solr:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-03 at 12:37

            When you're using a wildcard most of the analysis chain is skipped (only filters that are multiterm aware are applied - which means that usually only the LowercaseFilter).

            In your case the WordDelimiterFilter changes the tokens in a way that there are no tokens stored that begins with l3023. You can use the Analysis page under the Solr admin to see how the incoming text is processed and see what tokens are generated.

            The matching content in your example is 3023 - the stl part doesn't generate a hit (and since your query is for l3023 and not stl3023 the concatenate part of the word delimiter filter doesn't matter (since the token stored is stl3023, not l3023.

            If you want to perform matches inside a token, you might want to look at generating ngrams instead.

            PS: For 8.x you should probably use the graph filter version of the word delimiter filter instead.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66014692

            QUESTION

            Solr query not working as expected when it contains the `@` character
            Asked 2020-Oct-14 at 09:31

            I have a field called email_txt of type text_general that holds a list of emails of type abc@xyz.com, and I'm trying to create a query that will only search the username and disregard the domain.

            My query looks something like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-14 at 09:31

            When you're using the StandardTokenizer (which the default field types text_general, text_en, etc. use by default), the content will be split into tokens when the @ sign occurs. That means that for your example, there are actually two or three tokens being stored, (izz and helpmeabc.com) or (izz, helpmeabc and com).

            A wildcard match is applied against the tokens by themselves (unless using the complex phrase query parser), where no tokenization and filtering taking place (except for multi term aware filters such as the lowercase filter).

            The effect is that your query, *abc*@* attempts to match a token containing @, but since the processing when you're indexing splits on @ and separate the tokens based on that character, no tokens contain @ - and thus, giving you no hits.

            You can use the string field type or a KeywordTokenizer paired with filters such as the lower case filter, etc. to get the original input more or less as a complete token instead.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64342596

            QUESTION

            Solr Fuzzy Search With Spaces
            Asked 2020-Oct-13 at 16:26

            I would like to use the Fuzzy Search Feature of Solr. In my dataset, I have one record that looks like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-13 at 16:26

            My problem seems to be, that I indeed executed a Proximity Search.

            1. lastName:John\ D~
            2. lastName:John\ Do~
            3. lastName:John\ Doe~
            4. lastName:John\ Deo~
            5. lastName:John\ Xeo~

            works exactly like I intend. I have to make sure, all the special characters listed here https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/the-standard-query-parser.html are escaped properly.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64329561

            QUESTION

            Google Sheets - GROUP BY and ORDER BY on different column
            Asked 2020-Apr-14 at 19:17

            I got a table in this format

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-14 at 19:15

            I think you want this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61210582

            QUESTION

            How does q.alt param work when q is specified
            Asked 2020-Apr-12 at 19:22

            I referred this section

            I made q as empty and added a query q.alt=NAME:tokyo with dismax parser. It worked as expected.

            I added a query in q as NAME:london It returned nothing. I expected to return the docs which matches NAME:london

            To find out the reason I enabled debugQuery and the query is translated as +DisjunctionMaxQuery:(((NAME:name:london) ^ 1.0) ())

            I couldn't understand this translation. Could anyone clarify this please?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-12 at 19:22

            The dismax parser does not support the Lucene syntax (field:value). The edismax (the e signifies the Extended Dismax Parser) however, does.

            Use the edismax parser instead if you want to provide queries as regular lucene query syntax. In general you'd however be better off having the query as london - i.e. q=london and then use qf to tell edismax which fields you want to search - qf=NAME.

            Your query string does then become q=london&qf=NAME&defType=edismax - this query would however behave the same using the older dismax parser as well.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61175010

            QUESTION

            solr fuzzy vs wildcard vs stemmer
            Asked 2020-Apr-10 at 10:41

            I have couple of questions here.

            I want to search a term jumps

            With Fuzzy search, I can do jump~ With wild card search, I can do jump* With stemmer I can do, jump

            My understanding is that, fuzzy search gives pump. Wildcard search gives jumping as well. Stemmer gives "jumper" also.

            I totally agree with the results.

            1. What is the performance of thes three?

              • Wild card is not recommended if it is at the beginning of the term - my understanding as it has to match with all the tokens in the index - But in this case, it would be all the tokens which starts jump

              • Fuzzy search gives me unpredicted results - It has to do something kind of spellcheck I assume.

              • Stemmer suits only particular scenarios like it can;t match pumps.

            2. How should I use these things which can give more relevant results?

            I probably more confused about all these because of this section. Any suggestions please?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-10 at 08:08

            For question 2 you can go strict to permissive.

            Option one: Only give strict search result. If no result found give stemmer results. Continue with fuzzy or wildcard search if no result found previously.

            Option two: Give all results but rank them by level (ie. first exact match, then stemmer result, ...)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61132899

            QUESTION

            Howto enable Fulcro Websockets
            Asked 2020-Mar-16 at 08:32

            I have a basic question about how to get started with Fulcro and Websockets.

            i) I started with the Fulcro lein template. ii) Then added the websocket client and server bits. iii) In my server, I also added a com.fulcrologic.fulcro.networking.websocket-protocols.WSListener to detect when a WS client is connecting.

            Between the WSListener, and the browser's network console, I can see that the client is never making a WS connection.

            • How does Fulcro make the initial WS connection?
            • After that, how can I make server pushes to client?

            client.cljs

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-16 at 08:32

            Since fulcro-websockets 3.1.0 the websocket connection is made on the first data transfer via websocket remote.

            If you want to force the connection, you can do that by sending any mutation over the remote:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60695250

            QUESTION

            How to combine queries for empty values in Solr?
            Asked 2020-Mar-03 at 08:57

            I'm trying to query solr docs with empty field values and am not able to get it going:

            Let's say the docs have two potentially empty fields name_de and name_en.

            Querying for one of those as described in the solr docs works fine:

            -name_de:[* TO *]

            But as soon as I start to combine more than one query of that kind, the answer is not what I would expect:

            -name_de:[* TO *] OR -name_en:[* TO *]

            should deliver something like the union of both queries I would think. Yet it doesn't. I simply did not understand the answer: in my case I have 1310 docs delivered by querying for name_de, 1319 by querying for name_en - and get 950 when combining both as shown above.

            As I understand the Solr docs:

            Pure negative queries (all clauses prohibited) are allowed (only as a top-level clause)

            these "pure negative queries" cannot be combined and the whole functionality is not supported by Lucene out of the box but an "extension" by Solr's Standard Query Parser.

            But I have not been able to find relevant resources stating that more cleary and indicating the correct handling of empty values and I wonder if my approach is wholly wrong.

            Does anyone have a hint for me how to handle / query these empty values in Solr correctly?

            PS: Trying to incorporate the exists function didn't work out as well: calling these always delivered all the documents, regardless of their content in name_de or name_en.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-03 at 08:57

            Usually you have to be more specific when you're "subtracting" something from a result:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60503362

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install query-parser

            This is example code for my tutorial Build a query parser.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/look/query-parser.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone look/query-parser

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:look/query-parser.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link