disc | Simple Disque-powered Ruby Jobs | Application Framework library

One option may look like so:

1. I have put the parameters for your curves in a data.frame
2. Making use of a function factory and pmap to loop over the params df to create a list of your icc functions.

The rest is pretty straighforward.

1. Loop over the list of functions to get the derivatives.

2. Use map to add the stat_function layers.

Looks pretty straightforward to translate it directly:

You should create a data property trackProgress and update it in the listener which you create in created() hook (similar to ended event).

You need your math operator to be inside the Jinja expression {{ ... }}.

Moreover, since you are getting [238273] and [483298433] your JMESPath queries in json_query are returning you two lists, so you do want to use the first filter.

Last, but not least, those two values are still going to return you some string, so you do want to use the int filter.

You can use my boot sector loaders (ldosboot boot.asm for FAT12 / FAT16 FS) and my boot image creation script to make a 1440 KiB file system image preloaded with your kernel executable and a loader in the first sector. You'll also need my macro collection. Here's an example shell session to clone the repos and build an image. This is using hg (Mercurial) to load the repos, wget to get a release of my debugger as an example program, Info-ZIP's unzip to unpack it, NASM to assemble the loader and image, and qemu to run everything once assembled.

Pointers to dynamically sized types (DSTs) like Box> are "fat". A Box> is not a pointer to a DST (as the size of IntoIter is known), and hence can be a "thin" pointer simply pointing to the instance of IntoIter on the heap.

The creation and usage of a fat pointer is more expensive than that of a thin pointer. This is why, as @Aplet123 mentioned, you need to explicitly tell the compiler somehow (via type annotations or an as cast) that you want to cast the thin Box> pointer generated by your closure to a fat Box> pointer.

Note that if you remove the let binding and create the closure in the argument list of the foo function call, then the compiler makes the closure must return a fat pointer because of the argument type expected by foo.

For first input the table was all good because you were appending the same order every time within the forEach. In order to solve it, put it outside so that the next times it will print the current object typed. Also, you have to do configure a way to avoid the submition of empty forms.

Note that I needed to adapt your HTML creating a

I would propose dtplyr for this - in this fashion,

Assuming you want level = 2 results and no greater descendants, use a HAVING clause: