quickcheck | Automated property based testing for Rust
kandi X-RAY | quickcheck Summary
kandi X-RAY | quickcheck Summary
Automated property based testing for Rust (with shrinking).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of quickcheck
quickcheck Key Features
quickcheck Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on quickcheck
QUESTION
I've recently started learning Zig. As a little project I wanted to implement a small QuickCheck [1] style helper library for writing randomized tests.
However, I can't figure out how to write a generic way to call a function with an arbitrary number of arguments.
Here's a simplified version that can test functions with two arguments:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-23 at 23:26This can be done with std.meta.ArgsTuple
(defined in this file of the zig standard library)
QUESTION
I have a list of ~46 dependencies.
I produce a shell using among other things a call to:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-10 at 13:19A possible solution is pkgs.myHaskellPackages.server.getBuildInputs.haskellBuildInputs
, or pkgs.myHaskellPackages.server.getCabalDeps.libraryHaskellDepends
.
You can explore these attributes, or any expression, with nix repl
. You may have to expose some values from your let bindings though. In this case I just browsed through haskellPackages.warp
in nix repl
.
I also noticed you use rec
in an overlay. This will work for you until it doesn't. I'd recommend to remove rec
to avoid accessing attributes in a third way and use the more standard haskellPackagesNew.servant
instead.
QUESTION
I'm currently writing a Haskell library to replace a closed-source 3rd party command line application. This 3rd party CLI has a spec that I've replicated, but the actually binary allows much more permissive inputs than the spec.
I'd like to be able to generate inputs using QuickCheck
, then compare the result of a function in my library to the stdout of the 3rd party CLI app. The part I'm getting stuck on is how to introduce IO within a property test.
Here's the code I have so far:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-28 at 21:32I think I figured this out, I used this:
QUESTION
I'm struggling with the semantics of where
within do
blocks, specifically with Test.Hspec
. The following works:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-30 at 21:59This is a syntactic restriction in service of the scoping rules of a where block. Within a where
block, values bound in a pattern match are in scope, and values defined in the where
block are in scope for guards within that pattern match. As such, a where
block must be attached to locations where a pattern match and guards at the very least could exist. This ends up being value declarations and branches of case expressions. In your second example you are trying to attach a where
block to an arbitrary expression, which is just not what they're intended to do.
QUESTION
I'm trying to write the following test for an implementation of the dyadic rational numbers.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-02 at 20:00A bunch of these types are implemented in the package quickcheck-instances. Just add that into your dependencies, import Test.QuickCheck.Instances.Natural
, and you should be good to go!
QUESTION
I have the following code, where I try to implement Rng
and RngCore
for a custom type.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-31 at 11:43tl;dr That is the wrong trait to implement if you want to generate random values of your own type.
The trait Rng
is an extension trait for RngCore
, with a blanket implementation included. This means that all types which implement RngCore
already implement Rng
, and you should not try to provide it yourself.
Once Rng
is put into scope, all implementations of RngCore
will have the extra methods provided there.
However:
I want to implement the traits because I later want to use the
quickcheck::Arbitrary
with my type.
So this is an XY problem! RngCore
is designed to create random number generation algorithms, not to define how data types are sampled from a random number source.
QUESTION
wrote the code below and am getting some issues with it :
The error I am getting is : Data constructor not in scope: Int :: Int
If I eradicate the Numeric Int element from my array the code works perfectly fine, however Numeric Int is a constructor of the type Rank so it should also be included but I am unsure of how to include it without this error being produced.
Below is the code and apologises if this question is long-winded or silly, this is my first post on StackOverflow so any feedback on how this q was asked would also be greatly appreciated.
Any help would be immensely appreciated
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-10 at 15:36Your Arbitrary
instance for a Rank
contains an Int
:
QUESTION
I want to write a function search :: String -> Char -> [Int]
that returns the positions of all occurrences of the second argument in the first. For example:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 05:48There are several issues with prop_search
. While the compiler messages in Haskell can be a bit daunting, the first troubleshooting tip is to realise that (unless you're using some advanced extensions to the language) the type annotations are redundant. The compiler doesn't need the type annotation, but it's good practice to include them because it helps with readability.
Thus, first try to see if the expression itself compiles. Here, I'm just using GHCi:
QUESTION
I have recently started exploring property based testing using junit-quickcheck. I came across an usecase where a property has to take a list of entities(I have a generator for a standalone entity). I have tried with the code below and it always gives an empty list.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-26 at 06:21Since you haven't yet received an answer for "junit-quickcheck" I can at least confirm that it works as expected in jqwik.net (an alternative to junit-quickcheck using the JUnit 5 platform):
QUESTION
I'm following haskellbook.com and there is an exercise for QuickCheck, long history short I can't figure out how to implement a instance for arbitrary for my type because it has a parametric type
Here is the code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-04 at 03:18What you want to do is use the Arbitrary
instance for a
. I can tell you know you need to do this because you already added Arbitrary a
as a constraint to the instance, but you need to actually use it. For instance:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install quickcheck
"use_logging": (Enabled by default.) Enables the log messages governed RUST_LOG.
"regex": (Enabled by default.) Enables the use of regexes with env_logger.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page