wire | A rustic tcp serialization abstraction | Serialization library

In your test, you are calling a 'remote' request, the changes are in 'remote':

found some answers to my own question, sharing with community

6-sec auto-switch mode is a new feature in Android 12, which works only if (mode == AudioSystem.MODE_IN_COMMUNICATION) (check out flow related to MSG_CHECK_MODE_FOR_UID flag). This should help for MODE_IN_COMMUNICATION set to AudioManager and left after app exit, this was messing with global/system-level audio routing. There is also a brand new AudioManager.OnModeChangedListener called when mode is (auto-)changing

and setSpeakerphoneOn turns out to be deprecated, even if this isn't marked in doc... we have new method setCommunicationDevice(AudioDeviceInfo) and in its description we have info about startBluetoothSco(), stopBluetoothSco() and setSpeakerphoneOn(boolean) deprecation. I'm using all three methods and now on Android 12 I'm iterating through getAvailableCommunicationDevices(), comparing type of every item and if desired type found I'm calling setCommunicationDevice(targetAudioDeviceInfo). I'm NOT switching audio mode at all now, staying on MODE_NORMAL. All my streams are AudioManager.STREAM_VOICE_CALL type (where applicable)

for built-in earpiece audio playback aka. "ear-friendly mode" we were using

It is really simple. Just create a bean of the Logbook type in a @Configuration class:

I was able to reproduce this error; in my case the stack trace led back to the barryvdh/laravel-debugbar package, not sure if this is the same for you. I was able to resolve it by changing the enum to a backed enum.

I'd recommend making this change regardless, as I expect in a lot of cases strings will be easier to work with than enum instances. (Though TBH this looks like trying to use a new feature just because it's there, not because it makes sense.)

This could be simply done in awk program, with your shown samples, please try following.

The earliest use I could find of "fuse" in the Rust ecosystem is Iterator::fuse, which was added to the standard library during the pre-1.0 days. The initial documentation for Iterator::fuse said:

Posting an answer so the question can be closed. It took me a while but I think I figured it out.

Thanks to @SethTisue for pointing me to TwoTails. I was able to correctly synthesize a method using the part of the code in that repo. However the bottom line is doing something like this after the typer is not trivially possible. Here is the reason why:

Say you are trying to synthesize and append a method m to a class C after the typer. The problem is if you are synthesizing this method, you will eventually invoke it somewhere new C().m. The membership is resolved during the typer, so the typer will never complete and throw an error method m is not a member of C. So,

1. If you don't require the package information to achieve this, you should do this after the parser

2. If you need the package information, this gets very tricky. You need to add a few new phases after the parser. I will omit the code because it is very lengthy but here is the gist of it.

   1. Phase 1: Accumulate the list of Class Names you will be appending to and their existing method, skip if it's a pre-known class

   2. Phase 2: Go through the code and accumulate a list of all the symbols that correspond to an instance of this class. ValDef and any parameters to the DefDef. If you have implemented Hindley Milner you will immediately identify the problem that will a way to distinguish similarly named symbols in different scopes. There is a lot of existing literature on this that you can read, I am skipping the details.

   3. Phase 3: Go through the code and accumulate a list of method names that are invoked on C but doesn't yet exist. You need to memorize the parameters and their types as well. Whether you need the return type or not really depends on what you are doing and/or if you want extra soundness/verification in a later step. You can skip this phase if the method you are appending is static and you already know what members will be missing in advance.

   4. Phase 4: Go through the code one last time and append a null method into C that with the proper name and types. Retuning null isn't the best thing, not sure if there is a better alternative.

   5. Later in the typer replace the appended method body with the proper one (the one you are copying)

The actual synthesis looks like this but as I mentioned above, if you actually want this to work, you will need to figure out all the stuff above.

I never used the chartist, but I usually use this approach (let me know if the code make sense to you).